IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/010027/10757.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A CGE MODEL TO MEASURE THE IMPACT OF THE US EXPENDITURES ON THE LAJES AIR BASE ON THE ECONOMIES OF THE AZORES AND TERCEIRA – An updated evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Jose A. Fortuna
  • Masudi Opese
  • Francisco Silva

Abstract

The current study analyses the impact on a local economy, the Azores, of a downsizing/closure of a military base. To this effect, a dynamic CGE model detailing six household categories, forty-five sectors and four trading partners is used. Air bases can have important local and even regional economic impacts and can influence the structure of the immediate communities. Geopolitical and technical change has dictated, in many cases, base reduction or even base closure policies. The current paper specifies a CGE model to measure the impact of such policies on the local economy and to analyze possible mitigating policy reactions. It is found that the potential impact on this small regional economy will mostly be felt on private consumption and investment, will have a relatively higher impact on the lowest income group and will have differentiated sector impacts. The mitigating policies have the potential to, temporarily, offset the negative economic impacts, but they will not provide long-term positive impact with the current government expenditure structure. Relative to the business as usual scenario, GDP is estimated to be in the range of 0, 07 to 0, 09 percent lower by 2030. Using equivalent variation, the estimated welfare impact is negative for all six household categories with relatively higher losses for the lower income categories. The estimated loss in income varies between 22 and 44 million euros by 2030, depending on the scenario. Previous estimates of Bayar et al (2009) pointed to a fall of about 28 million euros, for an earlier time period and using an earlier SAM. Using the change in value added, the primary production sectors tend to be positively impacted while industrial and services sectors are negatively impacted. External balances are affected negatively. Since the model is conceived for economy wide impacts and the base is in one specific island, that represents 20% of the total economy, the impacts are expected to be fivefold in this island. Suggesting an overall negative impact, the model also points to a positive impact on primary production due to the fall in relative prices, which, however, does not compensate the negative impacts in other sectors. These results suggest that mitigation policies should be considered. It is also identified that policies based on the current structure of government expenditures will crowd-out private demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Jose A. Fortuna & Masudi Opese & Francisco Silva, 2017. "A CGE MODEL TO MEASURE THE IMPACT OF THE US EXPENDITURES ON THE LAJES AIR BASE ON THE ECONOMIES OF THE AZORES AND TERCEIRA – An updated evaluation," EcoMod2017 10757, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:010027:10757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Fortuna_Paper_LajesBase%20_2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda Andersson & Johan Lundberg & Magnus Sjostrom, 2007. "Regional Effects Of Military Base Closures: The Case Of Sweden," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 87-97.
    2. Adelman, Irma & Robinson, Sherman, 1989. "Income distribution and development," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Hollis Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 19, pages 949-1003, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vito Tanzi & Howell H. Zee, 1997. "Fiscal Policy and Long-Run Growth," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 44(2), pages 179-209, June.
    2. Alexander Schejtman & Julio A. Berdegué, 2006. "El Impacto Social de la Integración Regional en América Latina Rural," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9125, Inter-American Development Bank.
    3. Epstein, Gil S. & Spiegel, Uriel, 2001. "Natural inequality, production and economic growth," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 463-473, September.
    4. Ofori, Isaac K. & Dossou, Marcel A.M. & Asongu, Simplice A. & Armah, Mark K., 2023. "Bridging Africa’s income inequality gap: How relevant is China’s outward FDI to Africa?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    5. Rati Ram, 1997. "Level of Economic Development and Income Inequality: Evidence from the Postwar Developed World," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 576-583, October.
    6. Gathmann, Christina & Helm, Ines & Schönberg, Uta, 2014. "Spillover Effects in Local Labor Markets: Evidence from Mass Layoffs," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100378, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. repec:bla:jecsur:v:14:y:2000:i:3:p:337-58 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. De Maio, Lorenzo & Stewart, Frances & van der Hoeven, Rolph, 1999. "Computable General Equilibrium Models, Adjustment and the Poor in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 453-470, March.
    9. Agenor, Pierre-Richard & Chen, Derek H.C. & Grimm, Michael, 2004. "Linking representative household models with household surveys for poverty analysis : a comparison of alternative methodologies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3343, The World Bank.
    10. Josselin Droff & Alfredo R. Paloyo, 2015. "Assessing The Regional Economic Impacts Of Defense Activities: A Survey Of Methods," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 375-402, April.
    11. Matete, Mampiti & Hassan, Rashid, 2006. "Integrated ecological economics accounting approach to evaluation of inter-basin water transfers: An application to the Lesotho Highlands Water Project," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 246-259, November.
    12. Vos, Rob & Inoue, Keiji & Sánchez, Marco V., 2007. "Constraints to achieving the MDGs through domestic resource mobilization," Conference papers 331653, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Chhavi Tiwari & Sankalpa Bhattacharjee & Debkumar Chakrabarti, 2020. "Investigating Regional Inequalities in India: Are Indian Districts Converging?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 684-716, July.
    14. Hongyi Li & Danyang Xie & Heng‐Fu Zou, 2000. "Dynamics of income distribution," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(4), pages 937-961, November.
    15. Burkhauser, Richard V. & De Neve, Jan-Emmanuel & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2016. "Top Incomes and Human Well-being Around the World," IZA Discussion Papers 9677, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Nora Lustig & Darryl McLeod, 1995. "Salario mínimo y pobreza: un análisis de corte transversal para países en desarrollo," Coyuntura Social 13219, Fedesarrollo.
    17. Adam Aboobaker, 2022. "Macroeconomic Determinants of South Africa's Post-Apartheid Income Distribution," World Inequality Lab Working Papers halshs-03693225, HAL.
    18. Dahlberg, Matz & Martén, Linna & Öckert, Björn, 2021. "Who recovers from a job loss? The importance of cognitive and non-cognitive skills," Working Paper Series 2021:2, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    19. Sou-Cheng Choi, 2015. "A Complementarity Approach to Solving Computable General Equilibrium Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 305-323, August.
    20. Serhan Cevik & Carolina Correa-Caro, 2020. "Growing (un)equal: fiscal policy and income inequality in China and BRIC+," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 634-653, October.
    21. Diana Barros (a) Aurora A.C. Teixeira (b), 2021. "A Portrait of Development Economics in the Last Sixty Years," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 69-118, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Azores; Miscellaneous; Miscellaneous;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F00 - International Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:010027:10757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.