IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/6327.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

'Neighbourhood effects': can we measure them and does it matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Lupton, Ruth

Abstract

Renewed interest in disadvantaged neighbourhoods is generating increasing research activity. Current work includes qualitative community studies and quantitative investigations of area effects on individual outcomes. This paper criticises the contribution of area effects research to date. Methodological and data constraints mean that quantitative studies often operationalise a weak conception of neighbourhood that does not reflect the understanding gained from qualitative work. These constraints present a barrier to testing specific theories that might usefully inform policy, while exaggerated claims are made about the policy relevance of more generic work. The paper concludes that area effects should be accorded less significance in the broad debate on area-based policy. Multi-disciplinary work is needed to develop studies that can influence the design of specific programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lupton, Ruth, 2003. "'Neighbourhood effects': can we measure them and does it matter?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6327, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:6327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/6327/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Bowman, 2001. "Talking to Families in Leeds and Sheffield: A report on the first stage of the research," CASE Reports casereport18, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Mark Kleinman, 1998. "Include Me Out? The New Politics of Place and Poverty (published in 'Policy Studies', 21:1, April 2000)," CASE Papers 011, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    3. Gillian R Smith, 1999. "Area-based Initiatives: The rationale and options for area targeting," CASE Papers 025, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    4. Burgess, Simon & Gardiner, Karen & Propper, Carol, 2001. "Growing up: school, family and area influences on adolescents' later life chances," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6432, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruth Lupton, 2003. "Neighbourhood Effects: Can we measure them and does it matter?," CASE Papers case73, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Ruth Lupton, 2003. "'Neighbourhood Effects': Can we measure them and does it matter?," CASE Papers 073, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    3. Ruth Lupton & Anne Power, 2004. "What We Know about Neighbourhood Change: A literature review," CASE Reports casereport27, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    4. Eldin Fahmy & David Gordon & Danny Dorling & Janette Rigby & Ben Wheeler, 2011. "Poverty and Place in Britain, 1968–99," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(3), pages 594-617, March.
    5. Brian Nolan & Christopher T. Whelan, 1999. "Poverty In Ireland: The Role of Underclass Processes. Published as 'Urban Housing and the Role of Underclass Processes: the Case of Ireland?, Journal of European Social Policy, 2000 Vol 10 No 1," Papers WP115, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    6. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers 070, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. Brooke Sykes & Sako Musterd, 2011. "Examining Neighbourhood and School Effects Simultaneously," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(7), pages 1307-1331, May.
    8. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Fitzgerald, Amanda, 2013. "Labour's record on neighbourhood renewal in England: policy, spending and outcomes 1997-2010," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51197, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Gundi Knies & Patricia C Melo & Min Zhang, 2021. "Neighbourhood deprivation, life satisfaction and earnings: Comparative analyses of neighbourhood effects at bespoke scales," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2640-2659, October.
    10. Rowland Atkinson & Keith Kintrea, 2002. "Area effects: what do they mean for British housing and regeneration policy?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 147-166.
    11. repec:cep:sticas:/177 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Glen Bramley & David Watkins & Noah Kofi Karley, 2011. "An Outcome-Based Resource Allocation Model for Local Education Services in Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 848-871, October.
    13. John A. Rigg & Tom Sefton, 2004. "Income Dynamics and the Life Cycle," CASE Papers 081, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    14. Alasdair Rae, 2009. "Isolated Entities or Integrated Neighbourhoods? An Alternative View of the Measurement of Deprivation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(9), pages 1859-1878, August.
    15. Berkeley, Dina & Springett, Jane, 2006. "From rhetoric to reality: A systemic approach to understanding the constraints faced by Health For All initiatives in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2877-2889, December.
    16. Deborah A. Cobb-Clark & Sonja C. Kassenboehmer & Trinh Le & Duncan McVicar & Rong Zhang, 2015. "‘High’-School: The Relationship between Early Marijuana Use and Educational Outcomes," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 91(293), pages 247-266, June.
    17. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour's Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 06, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    18. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers case70, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    19. Rigg, John A. & Sefton, Tom, 2004. "Income dynamics and the life cycle," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6310, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Tunstall, Rebecca & Lupton, Ruth, 2003. "Is targeting deprived areas an effective means to reach poor people? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6359, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. John Rhodes & Peter Tyler & Angela Brennan, 2003. "New Developments in Area-based Initiatives in England: The Experience of the Single Regeneration Budget," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1399-1426, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    neighbourhood area effects;

    JEL classification:

    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:6327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.