IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v40y2003i8p1399-1426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Developments in Area-based Initiatives in England: The Experience of the Single Regeneration Budget

Author

Listed:
  • John Rhodes

    (Department of Land Economy, 19 Silver Street. Cambridge, CB3 9EP, pt23@cam.ac.uk)

  • Peter Tyler

    (Department of Land Economy, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EP, UK)

  • Angela Brennan

    (Department of Land Economy, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EP, UK, amb54@cam.ac.uk)

Abstract

This article reports recent research that has assessed the achievements of one of the most extensive area-based initiatives (ABIs) that has ever been adopted in England-namely, the Single Regeneration Budget. This research has sought to ascertain whether, at least in relation to the findings from SRB, there is evidence that the ABI has delivered what was expected of it and thus whether the underlying rationale for its deployment was valid. The article focuses on three key areas of relevance to the attainment of local area regeneration. These are: targeting social deprivation; bringing about effective partnership working; and, `bending' the activities of mainstream service providers. This article concludes by considering what the lessons from SRB are for the future shape and form of ABIs.

Suggested Citation

  • John Rhodes & Peter Tyler & Angela Brennan, 2003. "New Developments in Area-based Initiatives in England: The Experience of the Single Regeneration Budget," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1399-1426, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:8:p:1399-1426
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000094360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098032000094360
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098032000094360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brennan, Angela & Rhodes, John & Tyler, Peter, 2000. "The Nature of Local Area Social Exclusion in England and the Role of the Labour Market," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 129-146, Spring.
    2. Gillian R Smith, 1999. "Area-based Initiatives: The rationale and options for area targeting," CASE Papers 025, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Huang & Scott J. South & Amy Spring, 2017. "Racial Differences in Neighborhood Attainment: The Contributions of Interneighborhood Migration and In Situ Change," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(5), pages 1819-1843, October.
    2. Kevin Dean & Claudia Trillo & Erik Bichard, 2017. "Assessing the Value of Housing Schemes through Sustainable Return on Investment: A Path towards Sustainability-Led Evaluations?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Eitan, Avri & Herman, Lior & Fischhendler, Itay & Rosen, Gillad, 2019. "Community–private sector partnerships in renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 95-104.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Zheng & Baohong He & Mingwei He & Jinghui Guo, 2022. "Impact of Urban Spatial Transformation on the Mobility of Commuters with Different Transportation Modes in China: Evidence from Kunming 2011–2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Ian Hodge & Jessica Dunn & Sarah Monk & Maureen Fitzgerald, 2002. "Barriers to Participation in Residual Rural Labour Markets," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(3), pages 457-476, September.
    3. Rowland Atkinson & Keith Kintrea, 2002. "Area effects: what do they mean for British housing and regeneration policy?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 147-166.
    4. Berkeley, Dina & Springett, Jane, 2006. "From rhetoric to reality: A systemic approach to understanding the constraints faced by Health For All initiatives in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2877-2889, December.
    5. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour's Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 06, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    6. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers case70, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. Gutirrez Romero, Roxana, 2009. "Estimating the impact of England's area-based intervention 'New Deal for Communities' on employment," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 323-331, May.
    8. David Manley & Maarten van Ham, 2011. "Living in deprived neighbourhoods in Scotland. Occupational mobility and neighbourhood effects," ERSA conference papers ersa10p547, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Paul Chatterton & David Bradley, 2000. "Bringing Britain Together?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 15(2), pages 98-111, July.
    10. Ruth Lupton, 2003. "Neighbourhood Effects: Can we measure them and does it matter?," CASE Papers case73, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    11. Peter Batey & Peter Brown, 2007. "The Spatial Targeting of Urban Policy Initiatives: A Geodemographic Assessment Tool," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2774-2793, November.
    12. Ruth Lupton, 2003. "'Neighbourhood Effects': Can we measure them and does it matter?," CASE Papers 073, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    13. Jean-Mari Hakizimana & Hermanus Geyer, 2014. "Socio-economic inequality in South Africa according to different disparity indices," ERSA conference papers ersa14p133, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Philip S. Morrison, 2005. "Unemployment and Urban Labour Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(12), pages 2261-2288, November.
    15. Michael Noble & Gemma Wright & George Smith & Chris Dibben, 2006. "Measuring Multiple Deprivation at the Small-Area Level," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(1), pages 169-185, January.
    16. Valeria Saiu, 2020. "Evaluating Outwards Regeneration Effects (OREs) in Neighborhood-Based Projects: A Reversal of Perspective and the Proposal for a New Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Hine, Julian, 2011. "Participation index: a measure to identify rural transport disadvantage?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 882-899.
    18. John Rhodes & Peter Tyler & Angela Brennan, 2005. "Assessing the Effect of Area Based Initiatives on Local Area Outcomes: Some Thoughts Based on the National Evaluation of the Single Regeneration Budget in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 1919-1946, October.
    19. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Fitzgerald, Amanda, 2013. "Labour's record on neighbourhood renewal in England: policy, spending and outcomes 1997-2010," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122088, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Eldin Fahmy & David Gordon & Danny Dorling & Janette Rigby & Ben Wheeler, 2011. "Poverty and Place in Britain, 1968–99," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(3), pages 594-617, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:8:p:1399-1426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.