IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/125896.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Which direction for sustainable development? A time series comparison of the impacts of redistributive versus market policies in Bolivia and South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Bell, Karen
  • Hickel, Jason
  • Arbon, Rob
  • Zoomkawala, Huzaifa

Abstract

This article examines two major policy frameworks for achieving sustainable development: the market-based ‘Green Economy’ approach (exemplified by South Korea), and the redistributive ‘Living Well’ approach (exemplified by Bolivia). We compare the two paradigms in qualitative terms using document analysis, and we assess quantitatively how they have fared in terms of delivering progress towards sustainable development in each country. Time series data for the Sustainable Development Index and the Gini index were examined. The results show that, since ‘Living Well’ was initiated, social outcomes have continued to improve in Bolivia and, while emissions and material footprint have increased, they remain low and within or near sustainable boundaries. By contrast, South Korea has regressed in terms of sustainability. Social indicators have improved, but the Green Economy policy has failed to reduce ecological pressures. This raises significant questions about the legitimacy of the Green Economy paradigm as a model for achieving sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Bell, Karen & Hickel, Jason & Arbon, Rob & Zoomkawala, Huzaifa, 2023. "Which direction for sustainable development? A time series comparison of the impacts of redistributive versus market policies in Bolivia and South Korea," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125896, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:125896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/125896/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Calisto Friant & John Langmore, 2015. "The Buen Vivir: A Policy to Survive the Anthropocene?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 6(1), pages 64-71, February.
    2. Andrew L. Fanning & Daniel W. O’Neill & Jason Hickel & Nicolas Roux, 2022. "The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 26-36, January.
    3. James D Ward & Paul C Sutton & Adrian D Werner & Robert Costanza & Steve H Mohr & Craig T Simmons, 2016. "Is Decoupling GDP Growth from Environmental Impact Possible?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Gabor Harangozo & Maria Csutora & Tamas Kocsis, 2018. "How big is big enough? Toward a sustainable future by examining alternatives to the conventional economic growth paradigm," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 172-181, March.
    5. Bernstein, Alissa, 2017. "Personal and political histories in the designing of health reform policy in Bolivia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 231-238.
    6. Ergül Halisçelik & Mehmet Ali Soytas, 2019. "Sustainable development from millennium 2015 to Sustainable Development Goals 2030," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 545-572, July.
    7. Ringen, Stein & Kwon, Huck-ju & Yi, Ilcheong & Kim, Taekyoon & Lee, Jooha, 2011. "The Korean State and Social Policy: How South Korea Lifted Itself from Poverty and Dictatorship to Affluence and Democracy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199734351.
    8. Sophia Imran & Khorshed Alam & Narelle Beaumont, 2014. "Reinterpreting the Definition of Sustainable Development for a More Ecocentric Reorientation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 134-144, March.
    9. Hickel, Jason, 2020. "The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naudé, Wim, 2024. "Entrepreneurship Is Dangerously Obsessed with Growth and Incompatible with Current Visions of a Post-growth Society," IZA Discussion Papers 17158, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Karen Bell, 2017. "‘Living Well’ as a Path to Social, Ecological and Economic Sustainability," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(4), pages 19-33.
    3. Naudé, Wim, 2023. "Melancholy Hues: The Futility of Green Growth and Degrowth, and the Inevitability of Societal Collapse," IZA Discussion Papers 16139, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Suter, Manuel & Strahm, Noel & Bundeli, Till & Kaessner, Kaja & Cologna, Viktoria & Berger, Sebastian, 2024. "Framing effects in expert assessments of optimal GDP development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Naudé, Wim, 2023. "We Already Live in a Degrowth World, and We Do Not like It," IZA Discussion Papers 16191, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine, 2019. "The political economy of education and skills in South Korea: democratisation, liberalisation and education reform in comparative perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87607, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Yeray Hernandez & Gustavo Naumann & Serafin Corral & Paulo Barbosa, 2020. "Water Footprint Expands with Gross Domestic Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-6, October.
    9. Qaisar Ali & Sulistya Rusgianto & Shazia Parveen & Hakimah Yaacob & Razali Mat Zin, 2024. "An empirical study of the effects of green Sukuk spur on economic growth, social development, and financial performance in Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21097-21123, August.
    10. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.
    11. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    12. D. D’Amato, 2021. "Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 231-242, June.
    13. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Chuansheng Wu & Yuyue Li & Lingling Qi, 2022. "Assessing the Impact of Green Transformation on Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Case Study of 78 Cities in Western China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Fleckenstein, Timo & Lee, Soohyun Christine & Park, Jae Hyoung, 2023. "Skills and training in hierarchical capitalism: the rise and fall of vocational training in South Korea," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124872, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Mugabe Roger & Liu Shulin & Brima Sesay, 2022. "ICT Development, Innovation Diffusion and Sustainable Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    17. Andreoni, Valeria, 2020. "The energy metabolism of countries: Energy efficiency and use in the period that followed the global financial crisis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Davine N. G. Janssen & Eunice Pereira Ramos & Vincent Linderhof & Nico Polman & Chrysi Laspidou & Dennis Fokkinga & Duarte de Mesquita e Sousa, 2020. "The Climate, Land, Energy, Water and Food Nexus Challenge in a Land Scarce Country: Innovations in the Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-27, December.
    19. Marco Filippo Torchio & Umberto Lucia & Giulia Grisolia, 2020. "Economic and Human Features for Energy and Environmental Indicators: A Tool to Assess Countries’ Progress towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Yelin Dai & Yue Liu & Xuhui Ding & Chundu Wu & Yu Chen, 2022. "Environmental Regulation Promotes Eco-Efficiency through Industrial Transfer: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-31, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic growth; environmental policy; equity; socialism; sustainability transitions; well-being;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:125896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.