IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/120339.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implementation and evaluation of a multi-level mental health promotion intervention for the workplace (MENTUPP): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Arensman, Ella
  • Leduc, Mallorie
  • O’Brien, Cliodhna
  • Corcoran, Paul
  • Griffin, Eve
  • Leduc, Caleb
  • Coppens, Evelien
  • Tsantila, Fotini
  • Ross, Victoria
  • Abdulla, Kahar
  • Hauck, Pia
  • Amann, Benedikt L.
  • Aust, Birgit
  • Pashoja, Arlinda Cerga
  • Cresswell-Smith, Johanna
  • D’Alessandro, Luigia
  • Fanaj, Naim
  • Greiner, Birgit A.
  • Luyten, Jeroen
  • Mathieu, Sharna
  • Maxwell, Margaret
  • Qirjako, Gentiana
  • Reich, Hanna
  • Sanches, Sarita
  • Tóth, Monika Ditta
  • Kilroy, Joseph
  • Michell, Karen
  • Reavley, Nicola
  • McDaid, David
  • Van Audenhove, Chantal

Abstract

Background Well-organised and managed workplaces can be a source of wellbeing. The construction, healthcare and information and communication technology sectors are characterised by work-related stressors (e.g. high workloads, tight deadlines) which are associated with poorer mental health and wellbeing. The MENTUPP intervention is a flexibly delivered, multi-level approach to supporting small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in creating mentally healthy workplaces. The online intervention is tailored to each sector and designed to support employees and leaders dealing with mental health difficulties (e.g. stress), clinical level anxiety and depression, and combatting mental health-related stigma. This paper presents the protocol for the cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) of the MENTUPP intervention in eight European countries and Australia. Methods Each intervention country will aim to recruit at least two SMEs in each of the three sectors. The design of the cRCT is based on the experiences of a pilot study and guided by a Theory of Change process that describes how the intervention is assumed to work. SMEs will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control conditions. The aim of the cRCT is to assess whether the MENTUPP intervention is effective in improving mental health and wellbeing (primary outcome) and reducing stigma, depression and suicidal behaviour (secondary outcome) in employees. The study will also involve a process and economic evaluation. Conclusions At present, there is no known multi-level, tailored, flexible and accessible workplace-based intervention for the prevention of non-clinical and clinical symptoms of depression, anxiety and burnout, and the promotion of mental wellbeing. The results of this study will provide a comprehensive overview of the implementation and effectiveness of such an intervention in a variety of contexts, languages and cultures leading to the overall goal of delivering an evidence-based intervention for mental health in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Arensman, Ella & Leduc, Mallorie & O’Brien, Cliodhna & Corcoran, Paul & Griffin, Eve & Leduc, Caleb & Coppens, Evelien & Tsantila, Fotini & Ross, Victoria & Abdulla, Kahar & Hauck, Pia & Amann, Benedi, 2023. "Implementation and evaluation of a multi-level mental health promotion intervention for the workplace (MENTUPP): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120339, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:120339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/120339/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linnan, L. & Bowling, M. & Childress, J. & Lindsay, G. & Blakey, C. & Pronk, S. & Wieker, S. & Royall, P., 2008. "Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(8), pages 1503-1509.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devine, Carol M. & Maley, Mary & Farrell, Tracy J. & Warren, Barbour & Sadigov, Shamil & Carroll, Johanna, 2012. "Process evaluation of an environmental walking and healthy eating pilot in small rural worksites," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 88-96.
    2. Hee Park & Elizabeth Dalsey & Youngyoul Kang & Seoyeon Hong & Seungcheol Lee, 2012. "Organizational attraction toward a company that adopts a smoke-free policy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 169-189, March.
    3. Daniela Lucini & Eleonora Pagani & Francesco Capria & Michele Galliano & Marcello Marchese & Stefano Cribellati, 2021. "Evidence of Better Psychological Profile in Working Population Meeting Current Physical Activity Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Thomas Cunningham & Brenda Jacklitsch & Reid Richards, 2021. "Intermediary Perspectives on Total Worker Health in Small Businesses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Tarisayi Mkungunugwa & Patrick Opiyo Owili & Adamson Sinjani Muula & Hsien-Wen Kuo, 2022. "Implementation Determinants of Zimbabwe National Occupational Safety and Health Policy in Willowvale Industrial Area, Zimbabwe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Geneviève Jessiman-Perreault & Amanda Alberga & Fatima Jorge & Edward Makwarimba & Lisa Allen Scott, 2020. "Size Matters: A Latent Class Analysis of Workplace Health Promotion Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Likelihood of Action in Small Workplaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Andrea Schaller & Gabriele Fohr & Carina Hoffmann & Gerrit Stassen & Bert Droste-Franke, 2021. "Supporting Cross-Company Networks in Workplace Health Promotion through Social Network Analysis—Description of the Methodological Approach and First Results from a Model Project on Physical Activity P," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Aileen Hoge & Anna T. Ehmann & Monika A. Rieger & Achim Siegel, 2019. "Caring for Workers’ Health: Do German Employers Follow a Comprehensive Approach Similar to the Total Worker Health Concept? Results of a Survey in an Economically Powerful Region in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Achim Siegel & Aileen C. Hoge & Anna T. Ehmann & Peter Martus & Monika A. Rieger, 2021. "Attitudes of Company Executives toward a Comprehensive Workplace Health Management—Results of an Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Ella Arensman & Cliodhna O’Connor & Caleb Leduc & Eve Griffin & Grace Cully & Doireann Ní Dhálaigh & Carolyn Holland & Chantal Van Audenhove & Evelien Coppens & Fotini Tsantila & Victoria Ross & Birgi, 2022. "Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings: Protocol for a Pilot Study of the MENTUPP Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Ami Sedani & Derry Stover & Brian Coyle & Rajvi J. Wani, 2019. "Assessing Workplace Health and Safety Strategies, Trends, and Barriers through a Statewide Worksite Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Christophe Moussu & Steve Ohana, 2016. "Do Leveraged Firms Underinvest in Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from Health and Safety Programs in U.S. Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 715-729, June.
    13. Antti Äikäs & Pilvikki Absetz & Mirja Hirvensalo & Nicolaas Pronk, 2020. "Eight-Year Health Risks Trend Analysis of a Comprehensive Workplace Health Promotion Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    depression; mental health and wellbeing; occupational; organisational interventions; process evaluation; economic evaluation; self-harm; suicidal behaviour; suicide; workplace health promotion; workplace based health interventions; implementation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:120339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.