IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/119251.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Secure attachment predicts lower societal cost amongst severely antisocial adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Bachmann, Christian J.
  • Humayun, Sajid
  • Stevens, Madeleine
  • O’Connor, Thomas G.
  • Scott, Stephen

Abstract

Background: Social and economic costs associated with antisocial behaviour are well-established, but little is known about the potential costs savings/benefits of secure attachment in this high-risk group. We aimed to provide the first test of attachment quality as a distinct predictor of economic costs. Methods: 111 adolescents (10–17 years of age, M = 15.0, SD = 1.6; 71% male) referred to young offender services due to high levels of antisocial behaviour were included. Costs were measured by detailed service-use interview, and attachment security to mother and father elicited through the Child Attachment Interview. The level of antisocial behaviour and callous-unemotional traits were assessed. Cost predictors were calculated using generalised linear models. Results: Mean 12-months service costs were £5,368 (sd 5,769) per adolescent, with justice system and educational service costs being the main components. After adjusting for covariates, economic costs were predicted by attachment quality to fathers, with a difference of £2,655 per year between those with secure (£3,338) versus insecure attachment (£5,993); significant cost effects were not found for attachment quality to mothers. Higher levels of callous-unemotional traits, lower verbal IQ, higher levels of antisocial behaviour, and older age were also significant cost predictors. Conclusions: Secure attachment to fathers is a predictor of reduced public cost in adolescents with severe antisocial behaviour. This novel finding for severely antisocial youth extends previous findings in less antisocial children and underscores the public health and policy benefits of good caregiving quality and the value of population-level dissemination of evidence-based interventions that improve caregiving quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Bachmann, Christian J. & Humayun, Sajid & Stevens, Madeleine & O’Connor, Thomas G. & Scott, Stephen, 2023. "Secure attachment predicts lower societal cost amongst severely antisocial adolescents," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:119251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/119251/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Healey & Martin Knapp & David Farrington, 2004. "Adult labour market implications of antisocial behaviour in childhood and adolescence: findings from a UK longitudinal study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 93-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Millemaci, Emanuele & Sciulli, Dario, 2011. "The causal effect of family difficulties during childhood on adult labour market outcomes," MPRA Paper 29026, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. F. Vergunst & R. E. Tremblay & D. Nagin & Y. Zheng & Cedric Galera & J. Park & E. Beasley & Yann Algan & F. Vitaro & Sylvana M. Cote, 2020. "Inattention in boys from low-income backgrounds predicts welfare receipt: a 30-year prospective study," Post-Print hal-03147221, HAL.
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2prlafc9459u7oc5p9pdolft63 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sciulli, Dario, 2016. "Adult employment probabilities of socially maladjusted children," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 9-22.
    5. Roger Bowles & Chrisostomos Florackis, 2012. "Impatience, reputation and offending," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 177-187, January.
    6. Sam Parsons & Alex Bryson & Alice Sullivan, 2024. "Teenage conduct problems: a lifetime of disadvantage in the labour market?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 76(1), pages 60-80.
    7. Sciulli, Dario, 2012. "Child Social Maladjustment and Adult Employment Dynamics," MPRA Paper 36711, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Lundin, Andreas & Hemmingsson, Tomas, 2013. "Adolescent predictors of unemployment and disability pension across the life course – a longitudinal study of selection in 49 321 Swedish men," Working Paper Series 2013:25, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    9. John Robst & Jennifer VanGilder, 2011. "The role of childhood sexual victimization in the occupational choice of adults," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 341-354.
    10. Knapp, Martin & King, Derek & Healey, Andrew & Thomas, Cicely, 2011. "Economic outcomes in adulthood and their associations with antisocial conduct, attention deficit and anxiety problems in childhood," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 38200, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Bauer, Annette & Pawlby, S. & Plant, D. T. & King, Derek & Pariante, C. M. & Knapp, M., 2015. "Perinatal depression and child development: exploring the economic consequences from a South London cohort," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57718, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2prlafc9459u7oc5p9pdolft63 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    antisocial behaviour; attachment; callous-unemotional traits; economic cost; parenting; youth;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I00 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:119251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.