IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/112145.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A colonial cash cow: the return on investments in British Malaya, 1889–1969

Author

Listed:
  • Rönnbäck, Klas
  • Broberg, Oskar
  • Galli, Stefania

Abstract

Historical rates of return on investments have received increasing scholarly attention in recent years. Much literature has focused especially on colonies, where institutions have been argued to facilitate severe exploitation. In the present study, we examine the return on investments in an Asian colony, British Malaya, from 1889 to 1969 for a large sample of companies. Our results suggest that the return on investments in Malaya might have been among the highest in the world during the period studied. Nevertheless, this finding fits badly with theories of imperial exploitation and can only to a limited extent be explained by a higher risk premium. Instead, we argue that the main driver of the very high return on investments in Malaya was rather the substantial rise in global market prices of the output of the two main sectors of the Malayan economy, rubber and tin. The way that the process of decolonization unfolded in Malaya did, furthermore, not lead to any major nationalization of foreign-held assets, and did thereby not disrupt the return on investment in the region in the same way as decolonization did to the return on investment in some other colonies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rönnbäck, Klas & Broberg, Oskar & Galli, Stefania, 2022. "A colonial cash cow: the return on investments in British Malaya, 1889–1969," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112145, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:112145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/112145/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hillman, 2005. "Australian Capital And South‐East Asian Tin Mining, 1906–40," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 45(2), pages 161-185, July.
    2. Gilbert, C. L., 1977. "The post-war tin agreements : An assessment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 108-117, June.
    3. Smith, Gordon W & Schink, George R, 1976. "The International Tin Agreement: A Reassessment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 86(344), pages 715-728, December.
    4. Nicholas J. White, 2000. "The business and the politics of decolonization: the British experience in the twentieth century[An embryon]," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 53(3), pages 544-564, August.
    5. Richard S. Grossman, 2015. "Bloody foreigners! Overseas equity on the London Stock Exchange, 1869–1929," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 68(2), pages 471-521, May.
    6. Gilbert, Christopher L., 1996. "International Commodity Agreements: An obituary notice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Klas Rönnbäck & Oskar Broberg, 2019. "Capital and Colonialism," Palgrave Studies in Economic History, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-030-19711-7, December.
    8. Huff, W. G., 2002. "Boom-or-Bust Commodities and Industrialization in Pre–World War II Malaya," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 1074-1115, December.
    9. Frans Buelens & Stefaan Marysse, 2009. "Returns on investments during the colonial era: the case of the Belgian Congo1," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(s1), pages 135-166, August.
    10. Gareth Campbell & Meeghan Rogers, 2017. "Integration between the London and New York Stock Exchanges, 1825–1925," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1185-1218, November.
    11. Richard T. Stillson, 1971. "The Financing of Malayan Rubber, 1905-1923," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 24(4), pages 589-598, November.
    12. Jean-Francois Hennart, 1986. "Internalization in Practice: Early Foreign Direct Investments in Malaysian Tin Mining," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 17(2), pages 131-143, June.
    13. John Hillman, 1997. "The Impact of the International Tin Restriction Schemes on the Return to Equity of Tin Mining Companies, 1927-39," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 65-80.
    14. Edelstein, Michael, 1976. "Realized rates of return on U.K. Home and overseas portfolio investment in the age of high imperialism," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 283-329, July.
    15. Irving Stone, 1999. "The Global Export of Capital from Great Britain, 1865–1914," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-333-98377-5, December.
    16. Lees, Lynn Hollen, 2007. "International Management in a Free-Standing Company: The Penang Sugar Estates, Ltd., and the Malayan Sugar Industry, 1851–1914," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(1), pages 27-57, April.
    17. Cassis,Youssef, 2010. "Capitals of Capital," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521144049, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierre van der Eng, 2022. "Securities Trading in an Emerging Market: Indonesia, 1890s-1950s," CEH Discussion Papers 06, Centre for Economic History, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard S.Grossman, 2017. "Beresford’s Revenge: British equity holdings in Latin America, 1869-1929," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2017-003, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    2. Grossman, Richard, 2017. "Beresford’s Revenge: British equity holdings in Latin America, 1869-1929," CEPR Discussion Papers 12042, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Grossman, Richard, 2017. "Stocks for the Long Run: New Monthly Indices of British Equities, 1869-1929," CEPR Discussion Papers 12121, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Richard S. Grossman, 2015. "Bloody foreigners! Overseas equity on the London Stock Exchange, 1869–1929," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 68(2), pages 471-521, May.
    5. Abel Gwaindepi, 2022. "Fiscal capacity in ‘‘responsible government’’ colonies: the Cape Colony in comparative perspective, c. 1865–1910 [The spread of empire: Clio and the measurement of colonial borrowing costs]," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 26(3), pages 340-369.
    6. Flores Zendejas, Juan, 2020. "Explaining Latin America's persistent defaults: an analysis of the debtor–creditor relations in London, 1822–1914," Financial History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 319-339, December.
    7. Hannah, Leslie, 2017. "The London Stock Exchange 1869-1929: new bloody statistics for old?," Economic History Working Papers 82404, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    8. Gareth Campbell & Meeghan Rogers, 2017. "Integration between the London and New York Stock Exchanges, 1825–1925," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1185-1218, November.
    9. Shakila Yacob, 2009. "Hidden Disciplines In Malaysia: The Role Of Business History In A Multi‐Disciplinary Framework," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(3), pages 302-324, November.
    10. Leslie Hannah, 2018. "The London Stock Exchange, 1869–1929: new statistics for old?," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1349-1356, November.
    11. Degl’Innocenti, Marta & Matousek, Roman & Sevic, Zeljko & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2017. "Bank efficiency and financial centres: Does geographical location matter?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 188-198.
    12. Guillermo Lezama & Henry Willebald, 2020. "Inequality in Pre‐Income Survey Times: A Methodological Proposal," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(4), pages 931-957, December.
    13. Grossman, Richard & Campbell, Gareth & Turner, John, 2019. "Before the Cult of Equity: New Monthly Indices of the British Share Market, 1829-1929," CEPR Discussion Papers 13717, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Christopher Gilbert & Panos Varangis, 2004. "Globalization and International Commodity Trade with Specific Reference to the West African Cocoa Producers," NBER Chapters, in: Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics, pages 131-163, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Bordo, Michael D. & Meissner, Christopher M. & Stuckler, David, 2010. "Foreign currency debt, financial crises and economic growth: A long-run view," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 642-665, June.
    16. Imad Moosa & Larry Li & Riley Jiang, 2016. "Determinants of the Status of an International Financial Centre," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 2074-2096, December.
    17. Williamson, Jeffrey G. & Bassino, Jean-Pascal, 2015. "From Commodity Booms to Economic Miracles: Why Southeast Asian Industry Lagged Behind," CEPR Discussion Papers 10611, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Christophe Gouel, 2013. "Rules versus Discretion in Food Storage Policies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1029-1044.
    19. Ans Kolk, 2012. "Towards a Sustainable Coffee Market: Paradoxes Faced by a Multinational Company," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 79-89, March.
    20. Maria Carmela Schisani & Luigi Balletta & Giancarlo Ragozini, 2021. "Crowding out the change: business networks and persisting economic elites in the South of Italy over Unification (1840–1880)," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 15(1), pages 89-131, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Asia; colonialism; imperialism; Malaya; return on investments; twentieth century;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F54 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Colonialism; Imperialism; Postcolonialism
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • N25 - Economic History - - Financial Markets and Institutions - - - Asia including Middle East

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:112145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.