IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/1660.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Which Romans Do "as Romans Do"? Individual Differences in Conformity to Cultural Conflict Resolution Scripts

Author

Listed:
  • Fu, Ho-Ying

    (Stanford U)

  • Morris, Michael W.

Abstract

The current research investigates the proposal that cross-cultural differences in conflict resolution choices are driven by culturally conferred cognitive scripts-expectancies about appropriate actions in a setting and outcomes they will evoke. Cognitive styles such as Need for Cognitive Closure affect the extent to which individuals rely on their own cultural scripts and hence display culturally typical conflict resolution behaviors. We tested this prediction in two conflict resolution domains where robust differences between American and Chinese had been identified. Study 1 found that differences in conflict management styles emerge primarily in hihg NFC individuals. Study 2 found that differences in preference of types of the third party mediator are qualified by the same interaction with individual differences in NFC. Further evidence was provided by the statistical mediation of expectancies of harmony maintenance or restoration on the moderated cultural difference in choosing the third party. We discuss in light of how cognitive scripts compare with other proposed individual-level mechanisms underlying cultural differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu, Ho-Ying & Morris, Michael W., 2002. "Which Romans Do "as Romans Do"? Individual Differences in Conformity to Cultural Conflict Resolution Scripts," Research Papers 1660, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1660.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Allan Lind & Bonnie E. Erickson & Nehemia Friedland & Michael Dickenberger, 1978. "Reactions to Procedural Models for Adjudicative Conflict Resolution," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(2), pages 318-339, June.
    2. Adler, Nancy J. & Graham, John L. & Gehrke, Theodore Schwarz, 1987. "Business negotiations in Canada, Mexico, and the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 411-429, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ott, Ursula F. & Prowse, Peter & Fells, Ray & Rogers, Helen, 2016. "The DNA of negotiations as a set theoretic concept: A theoretical and empirical analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3561-3571.
    2. Torsten Bornemann & Martin Klarmann & Martin Moosbrugger, 2020. "Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Forschung zum organisationalen Einkaufsverhalten: Überblick über die Marketingliteratur [Behavioral B2B Buying Research—An Overview of the Marketing Literature]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 447-478, December.
    3. Fakhri, Issaoui & Torkia, Boussif, 2016. "The Determinants of the Asymmetric Power Effects in the context of Public-Private Partnership negotiation (PPP): theoretical Analysis and basic assumptions," MPRA Paper 69750, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Katiuscia Vaccarini & Francesca Spigarelli & Ernesto Tavoletti, 2015. "European Green Tech FDI in China: The Role of Culture," Working Papers 1507, c.MET-05 - Centro Interuniversitario di Economia Applicata alle Politiche per L'industria, lo Sviluppo locale e l'Internazionalizzazione.
    5. Katiuscia Vaccarini & Barbara Pojaghi, 2015. "Capitalizing on Cultural difference: A Cross-Disciplinary Outlook from Social Psychology to International Business," Working Papers 1508, c.MET-05 - Centro Interuniversitario di Economia Applicata alle Politiche per L'industria, lo Sviluppo locale e l'Internazionalizzazione, revised Jun 2015.
    6. Zhang, Zhi-Xue & Liu, Leigh Anne & Ma, Li, 2021. "Negotiation beliefs: Comparing Americans and the Chinese," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    7. John F. McCarthy & Carl A. Scheraga & Donald E. Gibson, 2010. "Culture, Cognition and Conflict: How Neuroscience Can Help to Explain Cultural Differences in Negotiation and Conflict Management," Chapters, in: Angela A. Stanton & Mellani Day & Isabell M. Welpe (ed.), Neuroeconomics and the Firm, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Junjun Cheng, 2020. "Bidirectional Relationship Progression in Buyer–Seller Negotiations: Evidence from South Korea," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 293-320, April.
    9. Langevin, Pascal & Mendoza, Carla, 2013. "How can management control system fairness reduce managers’ unethical behaviours?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 209-222.
    10. Ahern, Kenneth R. & Daminelli, Daniele & Fracassi, Cesare, 2015. "Lost in translation? The effect of cultural values on mergers around the world," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 165-189.
    11. Egri, Carolyn P. & Ralston, David A. & Murray, Cheryl S. & Nicholson, Joel D., 2000. "Managers in the NAFTA countries: A cross-cultural comparison of attitudes toward upward influence strategies," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 149-171.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.