IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cty/dpaper/21-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the analytics of infinite game theory problems

Author

Listed:
  • Gambarova, Z.
  • Glycopantis, D.

Abstract

We consider zero-sum and a non zero-sum games of two players with generalized, not necessarily linear, utility functions and infinite, compact pure strategy spaces. Emphasis is given to comparisons with results obtained in mathematical theorems. The games chosen make specific points in relation to the conditions of the theorems. The idea of δ functions is exploited to construct mixed strategies. We interpret their significance in joining pure strategies and show the application in confirming NE. Uniqueness of NE is looked at. An issue is also how far an analogy can be drawn from the case of the finite matrix games. The usually discussed game theory problems are easy to analyze but they do not cover the whole range of possibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Gambarova, Z. & Glycopantis, D., 2021. "On the analytics of infinite game theory problems," Working Papers 21/02, Department of Economics, City University London.
    • Handle: RePEc:cty:dpaper:21/02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/26265/1/WP2102%20%28On%20the%20analytics%20of%20infinate%20game%20theory%20problems%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip J. Reny, 2016. "Introduction to the symposium on discontinuous games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 61(3), pages 423-429, March.
    2. Aliprantis, Charalambos D. & Glycopantis, Dionysius & Puzzello, Daniela, 2006. "The joint continuity of the expected payoff functions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 121-130, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik Balder, 2011. "An equilibrium closure result for discontinuous games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 48(1), pages 47-65, September.
    2. Roman Kozhan & Michael Zarichnyi, 2008. "Nash equilibria for games in capacities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 35(2), pages 321-331, May.
    3. M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyanık, 2021. "Topological connectedness and behavioral assumptions on preferences: a two-way relationship," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(2), pages 411-460, March.
    4. Michael Zierhut, 2021. "Indeterminacy of Cournot–Walras equilibrium with incomplete markets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(1), pages 81-114, February.
    5. Amir, Rabah & Evstigneev, Igor V., 2018. "A new look at the classical Bertrand duopoly," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 99-103.
    6. Yann BRAOUEZEC & Keyvan KIANI, 2021. "Economic foundations of generalized games with shared constraint: Do binding agreements lead to less Nash equilibria?," Working Papers 2021-ACF-06, IESEG School of Management.
    7. Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau & Richard P. McLean, 2019. "Nash and Bayes–Nash equilibria in strategic-form games with intransitivities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 68(4), pages 935-965, November.
    8. M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyanik, 2021. "The Yannelis–Prabhakar theorem on upper semi-continuous selections in paracompact spaces: extensions and applications," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(3), pages 799-840, April.
    9. Roman Kozhan, 2011. "Non-additive anonymous games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(2), pages 215-230, May.
    10. Prokopovych, Pavlo & Yannelis, Nicholas C., 2014. "On the existence of mixed strategy Nash equilibria," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 87-97.
    11. D. Glycopantis, 2020. "Two-person Bargaining with Lexicographic Preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 8(1), pages 13-23, April.
    12. N. Sofronidis, 2008. "Topological upper limits of mixed Nash equilibria," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 34(2), pages 395-399, February.
    13. Rabia Nessah, 2022. "Weakly continuous security and nash equilibrium," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 725-745, November.
    14. Michael Zierhut, 2021. "Generic regularity of differentiated product oligopolies," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(1), pages 341-374, February.
    15. Kali P. Rath & Gongyun Zhao, 2021. "On the insufficiency of some conditions for minimal product differentiation," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 9(1), pages 53-65, April.
    16. He, Wei & Sun, Yeneng, 2019. "Pure-strategy equilibria in Bayesian games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 11-49.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cty:dpaper:21/02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Research Publications Librarian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decituk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.