IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cor/louvrp/992.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Aspects stratégiques des négociations internationales sur les pollutions transfrontières et du partage des coûts de l'épuration

Author

Listed:
  • CHANDER, Parkash
  • TULKENS, Henry

Abstract

[fre] Aspects stratégiques des négociations internationales sur les pollutions transfrontières et du partage des coûts de l'épuration. . Cette communication présente un processus de négociations internationales portant sur des pollutions transfrontières, formulé en termes d'une succession temporelle de décisions résultant d'analyses coûts-avantages accompagnées de transferts internationaux, et conduisant à un optimum de Pareto unanimement préféré au laissez-faire. Cette formulation, inspirée de la théorie des procédures d'allocation des ressources, fait apparaître sous la forme de ce que l'on appelle ici un « surplus écologique » les gains que permet la coopération.. Au-delà de cette propriété, qui est connue, on fait ici, en termes de la théorie des jeux coopératifs, une double analyse : d'une part, au moyen de jeux dits « locaux », celle de la question de savoir comment répartir le surplus, et par là les coûts de l'épuration, entre les pays concernés ; d'autre part, celle des raisons pour lesquelles il est plausible que cette même clé conduise le système économico-écologique à un élément du noyau du jeu « global » que l'on peut y associer. [eng] Strategic aspects of international negotiations on transfrontier pollution and of abatement cost sharing. . In this paper, a mathematical model is formulated of negociations between countries, bearing on some form of transfrontier pollution. The model, which is designed so as to converge to a Pareto optimum unanimously preferred to laissez-faire, makes explicit an " ecological surplus " that summarizes the benefits from cooperation among the countries. In addition, cooperative game-theoretic analysis is called upon to deal with two issues : first, by means of " local " games, the issue of devising a sharing rule for the surplus, and thereby for the costs of abatement ; second, the issue of whether the optimum reached by the process could also belong to the core of the " global " game associate
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • CHANDER, Parkash & TULKENS, Henry, 1992. "Aspects stratégiques des négociations internationales sur les pollutions transfrontières et du partage des coûts de l'épuration," LIDAM Reprints CORE 992, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    • Handle: RePEc:cor:louvrp:992
    Note: In : Revue Economique, 43(4), 755-768, 1992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Tulkens, 2006. "An Economic Model of International Negotiations Relating to Transfrontier Pollution," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 107-121, Springer.
    2. Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Dynamic Processes for Public Goods: An Institution-Oriented Survey," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 9-48, Springer.
    3. John Roberts, 1979. "Incentives in Planning Procedures for the Provision of Public Goods," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 46(2), pages 283-292.
    4. Chander, P. & Tulkens, H., 1991. "Strategically Stable Cost Sharing in an Economic- Ecological Negotiation Process," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1991035, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Chander, P., 1987. "Cost-sharing local games in dynamic processes for public goods," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1987027, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Kaitala, Veijo & Pohjola, Matti, 1992. "Acid Rain and International Environmental Aid: A Case Study of Transboundary Air Pollution Between Finland, Russia and Estonia," Discussion Papers 400, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    7. Tulkens, Henry & Schoumaker, Francoise, 1975. "Stability analysis of an effluent charge and the `polluters pay' principle," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 245-269, August.
    8. Parkash Chander & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Theoretical Foundations of Negotiations and Cost Sharing in Transfrontier Pollution Problems," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 123-134, Springer.
    9. Parkash Chander & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Exchange Processes, the Core and Competitive Allocations," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 64-79, Springer.
    10. Chander, Parkash & Parikh, Ashok, 1990. "Theory and Practice of Decentralized Planning Procedures," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 19-58.
    11. Mueller, Dennis C, 1976. "Public Choice: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 395-433, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Germain, Marc & Tulkens, Henry & de Zeeuw, Aart, 1997. "Stabilité stratégique et pollution-stock transnationale : le cas linéaire," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 1997001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles Figuières & Stéphanie Aulong & Robert Lifran, 2005. "Negotiation Processes for the Protection of Biodiversity," IDEP Working Papers 0505, Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France, revised May 2005.
    2. Chander, Parkash & Tulkens, Henry, 2006. "Cooperation, Stability and Self-Enforcement in International Environmental Agreements: A Conceptual Discussion," Coalition Theory Network Working Papers 12170, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    3. Gersbach, Hans & Winkler, Ralph, 2011. "International emission permit markets with refunding," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 759-773, August.
    4. Germain, Marc & Tulkens, Henry & Magnus, Alphonse, 2010. "Dynamic core-theoretic cooperation in a two-dimensional international environmental model," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 208-226, March.
    5. Chander, Parkash & Tulkens, Henry, 2006. "Cooperation, Stability and Self-Enforcement in International Environmental Agreements: A Conceptual Discussion," Coalition Theory Network Working Papers 12170, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. M. Germain & Ph.L. Toint, 2000. "An Iterative Process for International Negotiations on Acid Rain in Northern Europe Using a General Convex Formulation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 199-216, March.
    7. Spagat, M., 1995. "Leaving some stones unturned: A reassessment of iterative planning theory," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 85-105, September.
    8. Asheim, Geir B. & Froyn, Camilla Bretteville & Hovi, Jon & Menz, Fredric C., 2006. "Regional versus global cooperation for climate control," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 93-109, January.
    9. Jon Hovi & Hugh Ward & Frank Grundig, 2015. "Hope or Despair? Formal Models of Climate Cooperation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(4), pages 665-688, December.
    10. Gersbach, Hans & Winkler, Ralph, 2012. "Global refunding and climate change," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 1775-1795.
    11. A. Nentjes, 1994. "Financial Instruments for the Control of Transboundary Pollution," Working Papers wp94024, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    12. Yingxuan Zhang, 2020. "Regional Collaborative Electricity Consumption Management: an Urban Operations Research Model," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1-28, December.
    13. Parkash Chandler & Henry Tulkens & Jean-Pascal Ypersele & Stephane Willems, 2006. "The Kyoto Protocol: An Economic and Game Theoretic Interpretation," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 195-215, Springer.
    14. Johan Eyckmans & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "Simulating Coalitionally Stable Burden Sharing Agreements for the Climate Change Problem," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 218-249, Springer.
    15. Michael Finus, 2024. "A Mechanism for Addressing Compliance and Participation in Global Public Good Treaties: A Comment," Graz Economics Papers 2024-14, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    16. Earl Brubaker, 1977. "A two-stage hybrid mechanism for collective choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 101-111, December.
    17. Krieger, Tim & Nientiedt, Daniel, 2022. "The renaissance of ordoliberalism in the 1970s and 1980s," Discussion Paper Series 2022-05, University of Freiburg, Wilfried Guth Endowed Chair for Constitutional Political Economy and Competition Policy.
    18. Darcy W. E. Allen & Chris Berg & Sinclair Davidson & Jason Potts, 2022. "On Coase and COVID-19," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 107-125, August.
    19. Jacques H. Drèze & Charles Figuières & Jean Hindriks, 2006. "Voluntary Matching Grants Can Forestall Social Dumping," CESifo Working Paper Series 1867, CESifo.
    20. Bruno Frey, 1985. "State and prospect of public choice: A European view," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 141-161, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cor:louvrp:992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alain GILLIS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/coreebe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.