IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000407/006195.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Análisis crítico al sistema de indicadores de gestión para la educación pública en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Quesada Ibarguén
  • Ingrid Blanco Hernández

Abstract

Las Instituciones de Educación Superior con financiamiento público, deben rendir cuentas al Estado Colombiano, acerca de su desempeno en la ejecución de la labor que les ha sido confiada. El medio propuesto ha sido el de los indicadores de gestión, para lo cual el Estado traza unos lineamientos generales que sirven de apoyo a decisiones gubernamentales sobre políticas en materia de educación superior, entre ellas la asignación presupuestal a las universidades. Tal como está planteado, los indicadores de gestión no obedecen a un sistema propiamente dicho, razón por la cual este artículo presenta un análisis crítico de los indicadores de gestión para la educación pública en Colombia, basado en el modelo de calidad propuesto por Arturo de la Orden Hoz, que integra el contexto, la eficiencia, la eficacia y la funcionalidad. Se concluye que los indicadores de gestión propuestos por el Estado colombiano para las universidades públicas no miden la eficacia institucional ni la pertinencia de la educación que se imparte; que son de corte netamente eficientista y el propósito fundamental de su aplicación es contar con unos elementos que guíen la toma de decisiones en materia de asignación de recursos financieros a las IES como también decidir sobre la viabilidad o inviabilidad de la permanencia de éstas en el desempeno de la función que le ha confiado el Estado.****** Higher Education Institutions with public financing, are accountable to the Colombian State, through management indicators, for which the State outlines some general guidelines that support government decisions on policies in higher education, including the allocation budget to universities. As planned, the management indicators are not rooted in a system itself, which is why this paper presents a critical analysis of management indicators for public education in Colombia, based on the quality model proposed by Arturo de la Orden Hoz, which integrates the efficiency, effectiveness and functionality. We conclude that management indicators proposed by the Colombian state for public universities do not measure the effectiveness and relevance of the education provided; which is efficient and significantly cut and the main purpose of its implementation is to have some elements that guide decisions on the allocation of financial resources to HEIs as well as decide on the feasibility or viability of the continuance of them in the performance of the function entrusted to it by the State.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Quesada Ibarguén & Ingrid Blanco Hernández, 2008. "Análisis crítico al sistema de indicadores de gestión para la educación pública en Colombia," Revista Panorama Económico 6195, Universidad de Cartagena.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000407:006195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/385
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piore, Michael J, 1983. "Labor Market Segmentation: To What Paradigm Does It Belong?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(2), pages 249-253, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Favereau, 1989. "Marchés internes, marchés externes," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 273-328.
    2. Tatiana Karabchuk, 2020. "Job Instability and Fertility Intentions of Young Adults in Europe: Does Labor Market Legislation Matter?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 688(1), pages 225-245, March.
    3. Dario Pozzoli & Marco Ranzani, 2010. "Participation and sector selection in Nicaragua," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 591-610.
    4. Dickens, William T & Lang, Kevin, 1985. "A Test of Dual Labor Market Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(4), pages 792-805, September.
    5. Baden, Christian & Kober, Thomas & Schmid, Alfons, 1992. "Technischer Wandel und Arbeitsmarktsegmentation : ein ausgewählter Literaturüberblick," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 25(1), pages 61-72.
    6. Qingjun Zhao & Meijing Song & Hanrui Wang, 2022. "Voting with Your Feet: The Impact of Urban Public Health Service Accessibility on the Permanent Migration Intentions of Rural Migrants in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Cristian Dario Castillo Robayo & Julimar Da Silva Bichara & Manuel Pérez-Trujillo, 2017. "Retornos salariales para Colombia, un análisis cuantílico," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 36(63), pages 211-246, January.
    8. Jairo Andréz Gómez Arcila, 2008. "Agencias MIPYMES, creación de empresas y desarrollo empresarial: una lectura sobre Colombia y Puerto Rico," Revista Panorama Económico 6196, Universidad de Cartagena.
    9. Ariane Pailhé, 2003. "Labour Market Segmentation in Central Europe during the First Years of Transition," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 17(1), pages 127-152, March.
    10. Ravi Srivastava, 2019. "Emerging Dynamics of Labour Market Inequality in India: Migration, Informality, Segmentation and Social Discrimination," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 62(2), pages 147-171, June.
    11. LEDUC Kristell & GENEVOIS Anne-Sophie, 2012. "Segmentation du marché du travail - le cas luxembourgeois," LISER Working Paper Series 2012-35, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    12. Arnaldo Camuffo, 2002. "The Changing Nature of Internal Labor Markets," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 6(4), pages 281-294, December.
    13. Lay, Jann & Wiebelt, Manfred, 2001. "Towards a dual education system - a labour market perspective on poverty reduction in Bolivia," Kiel Working Papers 1073, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Andrea Acevedo Flórez & Adriana Morales Botett & Catalina Ramos Garcés, 2009. "Impacto económico y social del proyecto patios productivos implementado por las comunidades vulnerables de los departamentos de bolívar, córdoba y sucre," Revista Panorama Económico 7084, Universidad de Cartagena.
    15. Amaia Palencia-Esteban, 2019. "Occupational segregation of female and male immigrants in the European Union: accounting for cross-country differences," Working Papers 1905, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    16. Eichhorst, Werner & Kendzia, Michael J., 2016. "Workforce segmentation in Germany: From the founding era to the present time (Die Segmentierung der Belegschaft in Deutschland: Von der Gründerzeit bis heute)," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 49(4), pages 297-315.
    17. Efraín Cuadro Guzmán & Antonio Orozco Gallo, 2009. "Descripción metodológica y aproximación al cálculo de demanda de agua en la ciudad de Cartagena de indias para el ano 2009," Revista Panorama Económico 7081, Universidad de Cartagena.
    18. Maitreyi Bordia Das, 2016. "All in my Head? The Play of Exclusion and Discrimination in the Labor Market," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(02), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Nelson Alvis Guzmán & Luis Alvis Estrada & Aura Medina Fuentes & María Murillo Ibáñez, 2009. "Condiciones Del Acceso A Los Servicios De Salud En La Población De Cartagena De Indias," Revista Panorama Económico 7079, Universidad de Cartagena.
    20. Charles J. Whalen, 2020. "Post-Keynesian institutionalism: past, present, and future," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 71-92, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Calidad; Calidad de la educación; Evaluación; Gestión universitaria; Indicadores de Gestión; Quality; Quality of education; assessment; university management; indicators;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000407:006195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revista Panorama Economico (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fccarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.