IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000124/021032.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La tierra para uso agropecuario en Colombia: equidad y productividad

Author

Listed:
  • Perfetti, Juan José

    (FEDESARROLLO)

  • Leibovich,, José

    (FEDESARROLLO)

  • Delgado, Martha

    (FEDESARROLLO)

  • López, Enrique

    (FEDESARROLLO)

Abstract

Este estudio de Fedesarrollo, financiado por el Fondo Rodrigo Botero Montoya, analiza los problemas de equidad y productividad que afectan al sector agropecuario colombiano en relación con el acceso y uso de la tierra. El objetivo es proponer acciones de política pública e instituciones que permitan superar estos problemas y promover el desarrollo productivo, competitivo e incluyente de la agricultura y los territorios rurales. El estudio se basa en evidencia histórica, teórica y empírica para argumentar que la entrega de tierra no es suficiente si no se acompaña de medidas que aumenten la productividad y el bienestar de los agricultores, especialmente los pequeños. El tratamiento empírico se basa en el tratamiento de datos del Censo Nacional Agropecuario de 2014. A partir de estos se realiza la construcción del modelo de meta frontera estocástica y ejercicios de costeo a partir de las asignaciones presupuestales que implican los proyectos de reforma agraria, además de los presupuestos destinados a las entidades implicadas en las políticas analizadas. El estudio plantea que una política de tierras integral y comprensiva es clave para impulsar la transformación del campo colombiano.

Suggested Citation

  • Perfetti, Juan José & Leibovich,, José & Delgado, Martha & López, Enrique, 2024. "La tierra para uso agropecuario en Colombia: equidad y productividad," Informes de Investigación 21032, Fedesarrollo.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000124:021032
    Note: Financiado por: Fondo Rodrigo Botero Montoya – Fedesarrollo
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11445/4542
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaus Deininger & Derek Byerlee & Jonathan Lindsay & Andrew Norton & Harris Selod & Mercedes Stickler, 2011. "Rising Global Interest in Farmland : Can it Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits?," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2263.
    2. Pereira, João Márcio Mendes, 2021. "The World Bank and market-assisted land reform in Colombia, Brazil, and Guatemala," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Abdul-Hanan Abdallah, 2016. "Agricultural credit and technical efficiency in Ghana: is there a nexus?," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 76(2), pages 309-324, July.
    4. Ton, Giel & Vellema, Wytse & Desiere, Sam & Weituschat, Sophia & D'Haese, Marijke, 2018. "Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes: What can we learn from effectiveness studies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 46-64.
    5. Juan José Perfetti & Martha Delgado & Javier Blanco & Gabriela Paredes & Arturo García & Julián Naranjo & Javier Pantoja & Lilián González, 2019. "Adecuación de tierras y el desarrollo de la agricultura colombiana : políticas e instituciones," Libros Fedesarrollo 17614, Fedesarrollo.
    6. Keijiro Otsuka & Yukichi Mano & Kazushi Takahashi (ed.), 2023. "Rice Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa," Natural Resource Management and Policy, Springer, number 978-981-19-8046-6, March.
    7. Klaus Deininger, 2003. "Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15125.
    8. Juan José Perfetti & Luis Gabriel Caro & Roberto Junguito & Luis Alberto Zuleta, 2015. "Impacto de los factores de riesgo en el estado de la cartera del Banco Agrario: análisis y recomendaciones," Informes de Investigación 14444, Fedesarrollo.
    9. George Battese & D. Rao & Christopher O'Donnell, 2004. "A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 91-103, January.
    10. Segovia, Alexander, 2017. "The relationships between food security and violent conflicts: The case of El Salvador," ESA Working Papers 288958, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    11. Víctor Saavedra & Fernando Carriazo & Rafael Puyana & Carlos Felipe Reyes & María Mónica Salazar, 2023. "Concepto sobre el Plan Nacional Desarrollo 2022-2026 Componentes del ordenamiento territorial y los instrumentos que lo desarrollan," Informes de Investigación 20742, Fedesarrollo.
    12. Roberto Junguito & Juan José Perfetti del Corral & Martha Delgado, 2017. "Acuerdo de paz: reforma rural, cultivos ilícitos, comunidades y costo fiscal," Informes de Investigación 15419, Fedesarrollo.
    13. Fengxia Dong & Jing Lu & Allen M. Featherstone, 2012. "Effects of credit constraints on household productivity in rural China," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 72(3), pages 402-415, November.
    14. George E. Battese & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2002. "Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 1(2), pages 87-93, August.
    15. George W. Norton & Jeffrey Alwang, 2020. "Changes in Agricultural Extension and Implications for Farmer Adoption of New Practices," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 8-20, March.
    16. Cliff Huang & Tai-Hsin Huang & Nan-Hung Liu, 2014. "A new approach to estimating the metafrontier production function based on a stochastic frontier framework," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 241-254, December.
    17. Iregui, Ana María & Cano, Carlos Gustavo & Ramírez, María Teresa & Tribín, Ana María, . "El desarrollo equitativo, competitivo y sostenible del sector agropecuario en Colombia," Books, CAF Development Bank Of Latinamerica, number 990.
    18. Albert Berry, 2002. "¿Colombia encontró por fin una reforma agraria que funcione?," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 4(6), pages 24-70, January-J.
    19. Annemie Maertens & Hope Michelson & Vesall Nourani, 2021. "How Do Farmers Learn from Extension Services? Evidence from Malawi," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 569-595, March.
    20. Gabriel A. Sampaio Morais & Felipe F. Silva & Carlos Otávio de Freitas & Marcelo José Braga, 2021. "Irrigation, Technical Efficiency, and Farm Size: The Case of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    21. Segovia, Alexander, 2017. "The relationships between food security and violent conflicts: The case of Colombia," ESA Working Papers 288959, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    22. Currie-Alder, Bruce & Kanbur, Ravi & Malone, David M. & Medhora, Rohinton (ed.), 2014. "International Development: Ideas, Experience, and Prospects," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199671663.
    23. Hayami, Yujiro & Ruttan, Vernon W, 1970. "Agricultural Productivity Differences Among Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(5), pages 895-911, December.
    24. Habtamu Alem, 2021. "A Metafrontier Analysis on the Performance of Grain-Producing Regions in Norway," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, February.
    25. Roberto Junguito & Carlos Caballero Argáez & Juan José Perfetti del Corral & Enrique López Enciso & José Leibovich Goldenberg, 2022. "Episodios de la historia de la agricultura en Colombia," Libros Fedesarrollo 20640, Fedesarrollo.
    26. Christopher O’Donnell & D. Rao & George Battese, 2008. "Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 231-255, March.
    27. Juan José Perfetti & Boris Bravo-Ureta & Arturo García & Javier Pantoja & Martha Delgado & Javier Blanco & Roberto Jara & Consuelo Moraga, 2019. "Adecuación de tierras y el desarrollo de la agricultura colombiana : políticas e instituciones," Informes de Investigación 17269, Fedesarrollo.
    28. Gebregziabher, Gebrehaweria & Namara, Regassa E. & Holden, Stein, 2012. "Technical Efficiency of Irrigated and Rain-Fed Smallholder Agriculture in Tigray, Ethiopia: A Comparative Stochastic Frontier Production Function Analysis," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 51(3), pages 1-24, August.
    29. Nguyen Tuan Anh & Christopher Gan & Dao Le Trang Anh, 2020. "Does credit boost agricultural performance? Evidence from Vietnam," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(9), pages 1203-1221, August.
    30. Dogba, Kollie B. & Kosura, Willis Oluoch & Chumo, Chepchumba, 2021. "Stochastic meta-frontier function analysis of the regional efficiency and technology gap ratios (TGRs) of small-scale cassava producers in Liberia," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(1), March.
    31. María I. Agudelo & Camila V. Moreno, 2019. "Institucionalidad del financiamiento agropecuario," Informes de Investigación 17933, Fedesarrollo.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan José, Perfetti & Leibovich,, José & Delgado, Martha & López, Enrique, 2024. "La tierra para uso agropecuario en Colombia: equidad y productividad," Cuadernos de Fedesarrollo 21192, Fedesarrollo.
    2. Thanh Pham Thien Nguyen & Son Hong Nghiem & Eduardo Roca & Parmendra Sharma, 2016. "Efficiency, innovation and competition: evidence from Vietnam, China and India," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1235-1259, November.
    3. Zhang, Hui & Zhou, Peng & Sun, Xiumei & Ni, Guanqun, 2024. "Disparities in energy efficiency and its determinants in Chinese cities: From the perspective of heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    4. Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Higgins, Daniel & Arslan, Aslihan, 2020. "Irrigation infrastructure and farm productivity in the Philippines: A stochastic Meta-Frontier analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Qian Liu & Yongmu Jiang & Carl‐Johan Lagerkvist & Wei Huang, 2023. "Extension services and the technical efficiency of crop‐specific farms in China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 436-459, March.
    6. Economou, Polychronis & Malefaki, Sonia & Kounetas, Konstantinos, 2019. "Productive Performance and Technology Gaps using a Bayesian Metafrontier Production Function: A cross-country comparison," MPRA Paper 94462, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. John N. Ng’ombe, 2017. "Technical efficiency of smallholder maize production in Zambia: a stochastic meta-frontier approach," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 347-365, October.
    8. Khanal, Uttam & Wilson, Clevo & Shankar, Sriram & Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Lee, Boon, 2018. "Farm performance analysis: Technical efficiencies and technology gaps of Nepalese farmers in different agro-ecological regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 645-653.
    9. Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "A Copula-Based Meta-Stochastic Frontier Analysis for Comparing Traditional and HDPE Geomembranes Technology in Sea Salt Farming among Farmers in Phetchaburi, Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Owusu, Eric S. & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E., 2022. "Reap when you sow? The productivity impacts of early sowing in Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Delnava, Haleh & Khosravi, Ali & El Haj Assad, Mamdouh, 2023. "Metafrontier frameworks for estimating solar power efficiency in the United States using stochastic nonparametric envelopment of data (StoNED)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 195-204.
    12. Satoshi Honma & Jin-Li Hu, 2018. "A meta-stochastic frontier analysis for energy efficiency of regions in Japan," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Owusu, Rebecca & Kwadzo, Moses & Ghartey, William, 2022. "Regional Productivity Differential and Technology Gap In African Agriculture: A Stochastic Metafrontier Approach," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 10(1), January.
    14. Li, Hong-Zhou & Kopsakangas-Savolainen, Maria & Xiao, Xing-Zhi & Lau, Sim-Yee, 2017. "Have regulatory reforms improved the efficiency levels of the Japanese electricity distribution sector? A cost metafrontier-based analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 606-616.
    15. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Harms, Sören Guntram, 2019. "Performance comparison of management groups under centralised management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 845-854.
    16. Phuc Trong Ho & Pham Xuan Hung & Nguyen Duc Tien, 2023. "Effects of varieties and seasons on cost efficiency in rice farming: A stochastic metafrontier approach," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 13(2), pages 120-129.
    17. Mercedes Beltrán-Esteve & José Gómez-Limón & Andrés Picazo-Tadeo & Ernest Reig-Martínez, 2014. "A metafrontier directional distance function approach to assessing eco-efficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 69-83, February.
    18. Walheer, Barnabé, 2018. "Aggregation of metafrontier technology gap ratios: the case of European sectors in 1995–2015," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1013-1026.
    19. Jayanath Ananda & Dong-hyun Oh, 2023. "Assessing environmentally sensitive productivity growth: incorporating externalities and heterogeneity into water sector evaluations," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 45-60, February.
    20. He, Yan & Chiu, Yung-ho & Zhang, Bin, 2015. "The impact of corporate governance on state-owned and non-state-owned firms efficiency in China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 252-277.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tierras; Servicios Productivos; Reforma Agraria; Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2014; Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2022-2026; Metafrontera; Costo Fiscal;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q16 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods
    • R52 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Land Use and Other Regulations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000124:021032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Patricia Monroy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedesco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.