IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000123/017935.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

El pilar no contributivo y su rol en el sistema de protección a la vejez : Colombia mayor social

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Villar
  • Alejandro Becerra
  • David Forero
  • María A. Ortega

Abstract

La transición demográfica y el acelerado proceso de envejecimiento de la población en los países latinoamericanos implicará un crecimiento continuo del número de adultos mayores en situación de vulnerabilidad. El sistema pensional contributivo afronta una barrera estructural para ofrecer acceso a los trabajadores más allá del sector formal, lo cual es particularmente grave en países como Colombia, con una alta participación de la informalidad en su mercado laboral. En estos contextos, los mecanismos no contributivos y semi-contributivos son vehículos de política pública que están en la capacidad de ofrecer protección económica a la vejez y aumentar la cobertura de la población mayor. En este documento se analizan las características que debe tener un beneficio no contributivo bien disenado, que aumente la cobertura pero no desincentive la cotización al sistema contributivo de seguridad social, a través de tres aspectos: el valor del subsidio, su cobertura o focalización, y su interacción con los demás pilares. A partir de las mejores prácticas y la experiencia internacional de Chile, Brasil, Bolivia y Nueva Zelanda, se hace una propuesta de reforma al programa Colombia Mayor resaltando la forma en que éste puede complementarse con el pilar semi-contributivo de los Beneficios Económicos Periódicos – BEPS.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Villar & Alejandro Becerra & David Forero & María A. Ortega, 2020. "El pilar no contributivo y su rol en el sistema de protección a la vejez : Colombia mayor social," Working Papers Series. Documentos de Trabajo 17935, Fedesarrollo.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000123:017935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11445/3890
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Carvalho Filho, Irineu Evangelista, 2008. "Old-age benefits and retirement decisions of rural elderly in Brazil," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 129-146, April.
    2. International Monetary Fund, 2016. "New Zealand: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2016/040, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Leonardo Villar & Alejandro Becerra & David Forero, 2017. "Características de un Sistema Pensional Multipilar aplicado en el contexto colombiano," Informes de Investigación 16403, Fedesarrollo.
    4. Mr. Alfredo Cuevas & Ms. Izabela Karpowicz & Mr. Carlos Mulas-Granados & Mauricio Soto, 2017. "Fiscal Challenges of Population Aging in Brazil," IMF Working Papers 2017/099, International Monetary Fund.
    5. International Monetary Fund, 2016. "Brazil: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2016/349, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Leonardo Villar & Alejandro Becerra & David Forero, 2017. "Propuesta y estimación de los costos económicos de extender la cobertura del sistema pensional colombiano," Working Papers Series. Documentos de Trabajo 15727, Fedesarrollo.
    7. John, Susan St. & Willmore, Larry, 2001. "Two Legs are Better than Three: New Zealand as a Model for Old Age Pensions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1291-1305, August.
    8. Leonardo Villar & Soraya Montoya González & Susana Martínez-Restrepo & Lina María González-Ballesteros & Catalina Guitiérrez & David Forero & Erika Enríquez & María C. Pertuz, 2015. "Misión Colombia Envejece: cifras, retos y recomendaciones," INFORMES DE INVESTIGACIÓN 013888, FEDESARROLLO.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Acosta, Karina & Taboada-Arango, Bibiana & Otero-Cortés, Andrea & Bonet-Morón, Jaime, 2024. "Evolución de las transferencias monetarias en Colombia," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lanza Queiroz, Bernardo & Lobo Alves Ferreira, Matheus, 2021. "The evolution of labor force participation and the expected length of retirement in Brazil," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    2. Martha Alicia Yánez Contreras & Cristian David Maldonado Pedroza & Katherin Paola Del Risco Serje, 2016. "Participación laboral de la población de 60 anos de edad o más en Colombia," Revista de Economía del Caribe 14790, Universidad del Norte.
    3. Noviarini, Jelita & Coleman, Andrew & Roberts, Helen & Whiting, Rosalind H., 2023. "Financial literacy and retirees' resource allocation decisions in New Zealand," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Bernardo Lanza Queiroz, 2007. "The determinants of male retirement in urban Brazil," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 17(1), pages 11-36, January-A.
    5. Bando, Rosangela & Galiani, Sebastian & Gertler, Paul, 2022. "Another brick on the wall: On the effects of non-contributory pensions on material and subjective well being," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 16-26.
    6. Nicola Brandt, 2012. "Reducing Poverty in Chile: Cash Transfers and Better Jobs," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 951, OECD Publishing.
    7. Araujo, Claudio & Combes, Jean-Louis & Féres, José Gustavo, 2019. "Determinants of Amazon deforestation: the role of off-farm income," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 138-156, April.
    8. Kaushal, Neeraj, 2014. "How Public Pension affects Elderly Labor Supply and Well-being: Evidence from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 214-225.
    9. Xi Chen, 2017. "Old age pension and intergenerational living arrangements: a regression discontinuity design," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 455-476, June.
    10. Filho, Irineu de Carvalho & Chamon, Marcos, 2012. "The myth of post-reform income stagnation: Evidence from Brazil and Mexico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 368-386.
    11. Alexander M. Danzer & Lennard Zyska, 2023. "Pensions and Fertility: Microeconomic Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 126-165, May.
    12. Bosch, Mariano & Manacorda, Marco, 2012. "Social policies and labor market outcomes in Latin America and the Caribbean: a review of the existing evidence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58003, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Baez, Maria Josefina & Brassiolo, Pablo & Estrada, Ricardo & Fajardo, Gustavo, 2022. "Going subnational: Wage differentials across levels of government in Brazil, Mexico, and Uruguay," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Ospina-Cartagena, Vanessa & García-Suaza, Andrés, 2020. "Brechas de Género en el trabajo Doméstico y de Cuidado No Remunerado en Colombia," Working papers 52, Red Investigadores de Economía.
    15. Alexander M. Danzer, 2013. "Benefit Generosity and the Income Effect on Labour Supply: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 123, pages 1059-1084, September.
    16. Qiran Zhao & Stephan Brosig & Renfu Luo & Linxiu Zhang & Ai Yue & Scott Rozelle, 2016. "The new rural social pension program in rural China: participation and its correlates," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 647-661, November.
    17. Shu, Lei, 2017. "Essays on retirement income provision," Other publications TiSEM e5dd8c4e-03bf-4ec9-9651-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Pedro Rodrigues de OLIVEIRA & Ana Lúcia KASSOUF, 2012. "Impact Evaluation of the Brazilian Non-Contributory Pension Program Benefício de Prestação Continuada (BPC) on Family Welfare," Working Papers PIERI 2012-12, PEP-PIERI.
    19. Javier Olivera & Jhonatan Clausen, 2014. "Las características del adulto mayor peruano y las políticas de protección social," Revista Economía, Fondo Editorial - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, vol. 37(73), pages 75-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000123:017935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Patricia Monroy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedesco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.