IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_1188.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Privatisation of Network Industries in Germany: A Disaggregated Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Günter Knieps

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the impact of market-oriented institutional reforms in German network industries. A disaggregated approach is chosen, which differentiates between network services, infrastructure management and network infrastructure. The gradual opening of network service provision has already had a positive impact on the performance of all markets for network services. Nevertheless, harmonisation and integration of infrastructure management as well as an adequate regulation of access to the non-competitive infrastructures (monopolistic bottlenecks) is necessary in order to exploit the full benefits of liberalisation and privatisation of network service markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Günter Knieps, 2004. "Privatisation of Network Industries in Germany: A Disaggregated Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 1188, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp1188.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vogelsang, Ingo, 1988. "Deregulation and Privatization in Germany," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 195-212, April.
    2. Knieps, Günter, 2002. "Wettbewerb auf den Ferntransportnetzen der deutschen Gaswirtschaft: Eine netzökonomische Analyse," Discussion Papers 85 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    3. Ingo Vogelsang, 2003. "The German Telecommunications Reform – Where did it come from, Where is it, and Where is it Going?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(3), pages 313-340, August.
    4. Olivier Boylaud & Giuseppe Nicoletti, 2003. "Regulatory reform in road freight," OECD Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2001(1), pages 229-251.
    5. repec:bla:kyklos:v:50:y:1997:i:3:p:325-39 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Bos, Dieter, 1993. "Privatization in Europe: A Comparison of Approaches," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 95-111, Spring.
    7. Brunekreeft, Gert & Keller, Katja, 2000. "The electricity supply industry in Germany: market power or power of the market?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 15-29, March.
    8. Günter Knieps, 1995. "Standardization: The Evolution of Institutions versus Government Intervention," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Lüder Gerken (ed.), Competition among Institutions, chapter 11, pages 283-296, Palgrave Macmillan.
    9. Kay, J A & Thompson, D J, 1986. "Privatisation: A Policy in Search of a Rationale," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 96(381), pages 18-32, March.
    10. repec:bla:kyklos:v:42:y:1989:i:4:p:579-98 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Brunekreeft, Gert & Gross, Wolfgang, 2000. "Prices for long-distance voice telephony in Germany," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(10-11), pages 929-945, November.
    12. Knieps, Günter, 1996. "Wettbewerb in Netzen," Beiträge zur Ordnungstheorie und Ordnungspolitik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen;Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg, Germany, edition 1, volume 127, number urn:isbn:9783161466083, December.
    13. Sinn, Gerlinde & Sinn, Hans-Werner, 1992. "Kaltstart. Volkswirtschaftliche Aspekte der Deutschen Vereinigung," Monograph, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, edition 2, number urn:isbn:9783161459429.
    14. Charles B. Blankart & GÜnter Knieps, 1989. "What Can We Learn From Comparative Institutional Analysis? The Case of Telecommunications," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 579-598, November.
    15. Boss, Alfred & Stehn, Jürgen & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich & Schatz, Klaus-Werner & Bode, Eckhardt & Böhme, Hans & Horn, Ernst-Jürgen & Rosenschon, Astrid & Sander, Birgit & Schmidt, Rainer, 1996. "Deregulierung in Deutschland: eine empirische Analyse," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 889, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. repec:mhr:untord:urn:isbn:9783163450837 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wetzel, Heike & Growitsch, Christian, 2006. "Economies of Scope in European Railways: An Efficiency Analysis," IWH Discussion Papers 5/2006, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    2. Scheele, Ulrich, 2007. "Privatisierung, Liberalisierung und Deregulierung in netzgebundenen Infrastruktursektoren," Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Gust, Dieter (ed.), Wandel der Stromversorgung und räumliche Politik, volume 127, pages 35-67, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    3. Maria Jose Arcas & Patricia Bachiller, 2008. "Performance and Capital Structure of Privatized Firms in Europe," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 107-123.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knieps, Günter, 2004. "Limits to the (De-)Regulation of Transport Services," Discussion Papers 99, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    2. Holler ,Manfred J. & Knieps, Günter & Niskanen, Esko, 1997. "Standardization in Transportation Markets: A European Perspective," Discussion Papers 151, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Willner, Johan & Parker, David, 2002. "The Relative Performance of Public and Private Enterprise Under Conditions of Active and Passive Ownership," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30591, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    4. Christian Von Hirschhausen, 2006. "Reform de"r Erdgaswirtschaft in der EU und in Deutschland: Wie viel Regulierung braucht der Wettbewerb?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(1), pages 89-103, February.
    5. Bickenbach, Frank, 1998. "Auf dem Weg zu einer europäischen Wirtschaftsverfassung für Netzinfrastrukturen: Ausgangssituation, Veränderungen und offene Fragen," Kiel Working Papers 896, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Knieps, Günter, 2006. "The different role of mandatory access in German regulation of railroads and telecommunications," Discussion Papers 104 [rev.], University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    7. Knieps, Günter, 2004. "Privatisation of Network Industries in Germany: A Disaggregated Approach," Discussion Papers 100, University of Freiburg, Institute for Transport Economics and Regional Policy.
    8. Birke, Anja & Hensel, Vanessa & Hirschfeld, Olaf & Lenk, Thomas, 2001. "The East German electric power industry: between national property and competition," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 755-770.
    9. Haucap, Justus & Lange, Mirjam R. J. & Wey, Christian, 2012. "Nemo Omnibus Placet: Exzessive Regulierung und staatliche Willkür," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 27, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    10. Muhamad, Goran M. & Heshmati, Almas & Khayyat, Nabaz T., 2021. "How to reduce the degree of dependency on natural resources?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Walsh, Patrick Paul & Whelan, Ciara, 2001. "Firm performance and the political economy of corporate governance: survey evidence for Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 85-112, June.
    12. Evans, Lewis, 1998. "The Theory and Practice of Privatisation," Working Paper Series 3936, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    13. R. Daviddi, 1994. "Privatisation in the transition to a market economy," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 47(191), pages 399-429.
    14. Canuto, Otaviano & Alexandre, Michel & Lima, Gilberto Tadeu, 2003. "Investimentos externos em serviços e efeitos potenciais da negociação da ALCA," Oficina de la CEPAL en Brasilia (Estudios e Investigaciones) 28341, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    15. Nicola Fuchs-Schuendeln & Dirk Krueger & Mathias Sommer, 2010. "Inequality Trends for Germany in the Last Two Decades: A Tale of Two Countries," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 13(1), pages 103-132, January.
    16. Hans‐Werner Sinn, 2000. "EU Enlargement, Migration, and Lessons from German Unification," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 1(3), pages 299-314, August.
    17. Joachim Ragnitz, 2009. "East Germany Today: Successes and Failures," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(4), pages 51-58, 01.
    18. repec:ces:ifodic:v:3:y:2005:i:4:p:14567573 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Bucher-Koenen, Tabea & Lamla, Bettina, 2014. "The long Shadow of Socialism: On East-West German Differences in Financial Literacy," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100585, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. Ádám Szentpéteri & Álmos Telegdy, 2010. "Political Selection Of Firms Into Privatization Programs. Evidence From Romanian Comprehensive Data," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 298-328, November.
    21. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19035 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Peeter Peda & Giuseppe Grossi & Margo Liik, 2013. "Do ownership and size affect the performance of water utilities? Evidence from Estonian municipalities," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(2), pages 237-259, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_1188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.