IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp0373.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Survival of National Bargaining in the Electrical Contracting Industry: A Deviant Case?

Author

Listed:
  • J Druker
  • Howard Gospel

Abstract

One seemingly incontestable fact about British industrial relations over the last quarter century is the decentralisation of private sector collective bargaining from multi-employer level to the level of the enterprise, division, or plant. This article explores what is often seen to be a deviant case, namely the electrical contracting industry, where multi-employer national bargaining is claimed to have remained strong. This resilience would seem to be despite the fact that, on a priori grounds, given industrial structure and work organisation, multi-employer bargaining would seem unlikely in this industry. The first part of the paper briefly outlines the wider context of collective bargaining trends in British industry. In the second section, the development of collective bargaining arrangements in electrical contracting is outlined. The third section then investigates recent developments and the degree to which arrangements in the industry have deviated from the rest of the private sector. In the final section explanations are offered and implications are explored. The industry's bargaining arrangements are seen as having some positive outcomes in terms of the regulation of self-employment, employee benefits, and training.

Suggested Citation

  • J Druker & Howard Gospel, 1997. "The Survival of National Bargaining in the Electrical Contracting Industry: A Deviant Case?," CEP Discussion Papers dp0373, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/DP0373.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, William & Terry, Michael, 1978. "The Changing Nature of National Wage Agreements," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 25(2), pages 119-133, June.
    2. William Brown, 1993. "The Contraction of Collective Bargaining in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 189-200, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S Milner, 1994. "Charting the Coverage of Collective Pay Setting Institutions 1895-1990," CEP Discussion Papers dp0215, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Milner, S., 1994. "Charting the coverage of collective pay setting institutions 1895-1990," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20801, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Simon Milner, 1995. "The Coverage of Collective Pay-setting Institutions in Britain, 1895–1990," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 69-91, March.
    4. David Metcalf, 1993. "Transformation of British Industrial Relations? Institutions, Conduct and Outcomes 1980-1990," CEP Discussion Papers dp0151, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. Metcalf, David, 1993. "Transformation of British industrial relations? Institutions, conduct and outcomes 1980-1990," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20981, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Wolfgang Ochel, 2001. "Collective Bargaining Coverage in the OECD from the 1960s to the 1990s," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(4), pages 62-65, February.
    7. Hugh Scullion, 1981. "The skilled revolt against general unionism: the case of the BL Toolroom Committee," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 15-27, June.
    8. Gospel, H. & Druker, J., 1997. "The survival of national bargaining in the electrical contracting industry: a deviant case?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20301, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Ian Kessler & Sidney Kessler, 2015. "Engaging with management," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 20-26, January.
    10. Brown, W., 2006. "The Influence of Product Markets on Industrial Relations," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0652, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Zagelmeyer, Stefan, 2003. "Die Entwicklung kollektiver Verhandlungen in Großbritannien: ein historischer Überblick," Discussion Papers 17, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
    12. William Brown, 1993. "The Contraction of Collective Bargaining in Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 189-200, June.
    13. Derek Leslie & Yonghao Pu, 1996. "What Caused Rising Earnings Inequality in Britain? Evidence from Time Series, 1970–1993," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 111-130, March.
    14. repec:aia:aiaswp:wp42 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Derek Leslie & Yonghao Pu, 1995. "Unions and the rise in wage inequality in Britain," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(8), pages 266-270.
    16. Karlson, Nils & Lindberg, Henrik, 2011. "The Decentralization of Wage Bargaining: Four Cases," Ratio Working Papers 178, The Ratio Institute.
    17. Huiskamp, R., 1986. "Large corporations, industry bargaining structures and national industrial relations : a comparative and organisational approach," Serie Research Memoranda 0033, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.