IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ceo/wpaper/3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are the gains from a groundwater management policy so low?

Author

Listed:
  • Elsa Martin

Abstract

The point of departure of this work is Gisser and Sanchez' (1980) result according to which a groundwater management policy would not generate significant gains with respect to a situation with no control. The theoretical result is obviously checked for a fixed number of agents if the storage capacity of the aquifer is relatively large. We propose to add an entry component into Rubio and Casino's (2001) adaptation from Gisser and Sanchez' (1980) seminal model in order to make the number of farmers exploiting the resource endogenous. We then show that, at the steady state, the Gisser and Sanchez' result is not true anymore since the rent at the stationary equilibrium is zero, although it is positive if a central planner intervenes.

Suggested Citation

  • Elsa Martin, 2010. "Are the gains from a groundwater management policy so low?," INRA UMR CESAER Working Papers 2010/2, INRA UMR CESAER, Centre d'’Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l'’Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux.
    • Handle: RePEc:ceo:wpaper:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.dijon.inra.fr/cesaer/workingpapers/RePEc/ceo/wpaper/wp2010_2.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phoebe Koundouri & Christina Christou, 2006. "Dynamic adaptation to resource scarcity and backstop availability: theory and application to groundwater ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(2), pages 227-245, June.
    2. H. Scott Gordon, 1954. "The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Chennat Gopalakrishnan (ed.), Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics, chapter 9, pages 178-203, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Rubio, Santiago J. & Casino, Begona, 2001. "Competitive versus efficient extraction of a common property resource: The groundwater case," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 1117-1137, August.
    4. Kim, C. S. & Moore, Michael R. & Hanchar, John J. & Nieswiadomy, Michael, 1989. "A dynamic model of adaptation to resource depletion: theory and an application to groundwater mining," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 66-82, July.
    5. Sanchirico, James N. & Wilen, James E., 1999. "Bioeconomics of Spatial Exploitation in a Patchy Environment," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 129-150, March.
    6. C.S. Kim & Glenn Schaible, 2000. "Economic Benefits Resulting From Irrigation Water Use: Theory and an Application to Groundwater Use," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 17(1), pages 73-87, September.
    7. H. Scott Gordon, 1954. "The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(2), pages 124-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stahn, Hubert & Tomini, Agnes, 2021. "Externality and common-pool resources: The case of artesian aquifers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Eppink, Florian V. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2007. "Ecological theories and indicators in economic models of biodiversity loss and conservation: A critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 284-293, March.
    3. Sanchirico, James & Cochran, Kathryn & Emerson , Peter, 2002. "Marine Protected Areas: Economic and Social Implications," RFF Working Paper Series dp-02-26, Resources for the Future.
    4. Gardner Brown, 2000. "Renewable Natural Resource Management and Use Without Markets," Working Papers 0025, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    5. Martin D. Smith & Larry B. Crowder, 2011. "Valuing Ecosystem Services with Fishery Rents: A Lumped-Parameter Approach to Hypoxia in the Neuse River Estuary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(11), pages 1-39, November.
    6. Zhang Wei-Bin, 2011. "Economic Growth And Dynamics Of Renewable Resource With Housing, Agricultural And Resource Land Use," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 151-174, August.
    7. Siwa Msangi & Richard E. Howitt, 2007. "Income distributional effects of using market‐based instruments for managing common property resources," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(s1), pages 249-259, December.
    8. Bulte, Erwin H., 2003. "Open access harvesting of wildlife: the poaching pit and conservation of endangered species," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 27-37, January.
    9. Sanchirico, James & Wilen, James, 2000. "The Impacts of Marine Reserves on Limited-Entry Fisheries," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-34, Resources for the Future.
    10. Smith, Martin D. & Wilen, James E., 1999. "Spatial Patterns of Renewable Resource Exploitation: The California Sea Urchin Fishery," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 271493, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Foudi, Sébastien, 2012. "The role of farmers' property rights in soil ecosystem services conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 90-96.
    12. Scott Barrett, 2023. "Property Rights to the World’s (Linear) Ocean Fisheries in Customary International Law," CESifo Working Paper Series 10567, CESifo.
    13. Antle, John M. & Capalbo, Susan Marie, 2002. "Agriculture As A Managed Ecosystem: Policy Implications," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Behringer, Stefan & Upmann, Thorsten, 2017. "Harvesting a Remote Renewable Resource," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168250, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    15. Sanchirico, James N. & Wilen, James E., 1998. "Marine Reserves: Is There a Free Lunch?," Discussion Papers 10715, Resources for the Future.
    16. Marta Biancardi & Gianluca Iannucci & Giovanni Villani, 2022. "An evolutionary game on compliant and non-compliant firms in groundwater exploitation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 831-847, November.
    17. Eric Innocenti & Corinne Idda & Dominique Prunetti & Pierre-Régis Gonsolin, 2022. "Agent-based modelling of a small-scale fishery in Corsica," Post-Print hal-03886619, HAL.
    18. Schnier, Kurt Erik, 2009. "Spatial externalities and the common-pool resource mechanism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(1-2), pages 402-415, May.
    19. Sanchirico, James N. & Wilen, James E., 2000. "Dynamics of Spatial Exploitation: A Metapopulation Approach," Discussion Papers 10513, Resources for the Future.
    20. Smith, Martin D. & Sanchirico, James N. & Wilen, James E., 2009. "The economics of spatial-dynamic processes: Applications to renewable resources," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 104-121, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Groundwater management; Entry; Steady-state analysis.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ceo:wpaper:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corinne DASEN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceinrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.