IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cem/doctra/733.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Una nota sobre la evolución del bienestar en la Argentina desde la década de 1990 al presente

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Conte Grand
  • Carolina Coloma Conte-Grand

Abstract

Esta nota retoma el trabajo de Gasparini y Sosa Escudero (2001), en el cual se calcula el bienestar en la Argentina partiendo de distintas funciones de bienestar social de 1980 a 1998. El mismo concluye que el periodo 1994-1998 es una muestra de cómo analistas con distintos juicios de valor interpretan de forma diferente la historia: alguien que pondera muy negativamente la desigualdad social, considera que el bienestar cayó, mientras que quienes solamente valoran que aumente el excedente social (independientemente de cómo se reparta), o quienes no están tan preocupados por la inequidad, piensan que el bienestar subió. En esta nota se hace este mismo ejercicio para el periodo 1991 a 2019, que es para el cual se cuenta con información para todos los años. Los resultados muestran que entre 2011 y 2015 se da la situación opuesta: baja el ingreso medio y la desigualdad, lo que lleva también a valoraciones distintas con respecto a este período. También se encontraron indicios del ciclo electoral de raíz basada en el bienestar. En general, si el año anterior a la votación subió el bienestar gana el oficialismo, y si bajó gana la oposición. Esto ocurre más en las elecciones legislativas que en las presidenciales. La interpretación es que los votantes posiblemente analicen más el largo plazo que el corto a la hora de votar cuando se elige presidente que cuando se renuevan las bancas del Congreso.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Conte Grand & Carolina Coloma Conte-Grand, 2020. "Una nota sobre la evolución del bienestar en la Argentina desde la década de 1990 al presente," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 733, Universidad del CEMA.
    • Handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/documentos/733.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William D. Nordhaus, 1989. "Alternative Approaches to the Political Business Cycle," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 20(2), pages 1-68.
    2. repec:bla:econom:v:60:y:1993:i:239:p:357-65 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Leonardo Gasparini & Walter Sosa, 2001. "Assessing Aggregate Welfare: Growth and Inequality in Argentina," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 38(113), pages 49-71.
    4. Amartya Sen, 1976. "Real National Income," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 43(1), pages 19-39.
    5. Elizabeth Stanton, 2007. "The Human Development Index: A History," Working Papers wp127, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    6. Fleurbaey, Marc & Blanchet, Didier, 2013. "Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199767199.
    7. Daniel Lema & Jorge M. Streb, 2013. "Ciclos electorales en política fiscal," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 514, Universidad del CEMA.
    8. Michael Jakob & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2014. "Green growth, degrowth, and the commons," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 447-468.
    9. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D'elia Vanesa Valeria & Karczmarczyk Matilde, 2023. "Happiness vs. welfare functions: an analysis for the elderly in Argentina," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4644, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    2. Ulrich Schmidt & Philipp C. Wichardt, 2019. "Inequity aversion, welfare measurement and the Gini index," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(3), pages 585-588, March.
    3. Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio & Teixidó Figueras, Jordi, 2013. "International Equity on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and World Levels: an integrated analysis through distributive welfare indices," Working Papers 2072/220758, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    4. Jo Thori Lind & Karl Moene, 2011. "Miserly Developments," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1332-1352, June.
    5. Morten Nyborg Støstad & Frank Cowell, 2021. "Inequality as an Externality: Consequences for Tax Design," PSE Working Papers halshs-03495989, HAL.
    6. Peter ven de Ven & Anne Harrison & Barbara Fraumeni & Dale W. Jorgenson & Paul Schreyer, 2017. "Measuring Individual Economic Well-Being and Social Welfare within the Framework of the System of National Accounts," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63, pages 460-477, December.
    7. Creutzig, Felix, 2020. "Limits to Liberalism: Considerations for the Anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Amartya K. Sen, 1997. "From Income Inequality to Economic Inequality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 384-401, October.
    9. Céline Carrère & Anja Grujovic & Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, 2020. "Trade and Frictional Unemployment in the Global Economy," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(6), pages 2869-2921.
    10. Leonardo Gasparini & Walter Sosa, 2001. "Assessing Aggregate Welfare: Growth and Inequality in Argentina," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 38(113), pages 49-71.
    11. Fleurbaey, Marc, 2015. "On sustainability and social welfare," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 34-53.
    12. J.-M. Germain, 2020. "A Welfare Based Estimate of “Real Feel GDP” for Europe and the USA," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2020-03, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    13. repec:cte:werepe:2907 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Andrew Aitken & Martin Weale, 2020. "A Democratic Measure of Household Income Growth: Theory and Application to the United Kingdom," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(347), pages 589-610, July.
    15. Francois, Joseph & Rojas-Romagosa, Hugo, 2011. "Household inequality, social welfare, and trade," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 422-431, November.
    16. Zhong, Hai, 2009. "A multivariate analysis of the distribution of individual's welfare in China: What is the role of health?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1062-1070, December.
    17. Emmerling, Johannes & Groom, Ben & Wettingfeld, Tanja, 2017. "Discounting and the representative median agent," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 78-81.
    18. Olivier Bargain, 2017. "Welfare analysis and redistributive policies," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 15(4), pages 393-419, December.
    19. Marc Fleurbaey & Stéphane Zuber, 2021. "Fair Utilitarianism," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 370-401, May.
    20. Wodon, Quentin & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 2002. "Inequality and Social Welfare," MPRA Paper 12298, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Moti Michaeli, 2021. "On Measuring Welfare ‘Behind a Veil of Ignorance’," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(1), pages 57-66, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    desigualdad; crecimiento; bienestar; América Latina; Argentina;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution
    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valeria Dowding (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemaaar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.