IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt5354w222.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Daily Activity and Multimodal Travel Planner: Phase II Final Report

Author

Listed:
  • Kitamura, Ryuichi
  • Chen, Cynthia
  • Chen, Jiayu

Abstract

It is important that our travel be organized in an efficient way. One way to achieve this is to provide travelers with a trip planner that produces efficient travel itineraries for them. It is desired that a trip planner possess the following features in order to be useful: be able to handle multiple destinations, multiple constraints, and multiple modes; and be able to adjust travelers' preferences under different circumstances. These features cannot be found in existing trip planners. The goal is then to develop an "Itinerary Planner" that possesses all of these features. The Itinerary Planner attempts to identify the most desirable itinerary from among all feasible alternatives. The desirability of an itinerary is measured by an objective function, which is defined a weighted sum of seven criteria (i.e., attributes of the itinerary), The weights represent travelers' preferences to the attributes (e.g., total travel time and monetary cost). The Itinerary Planner first uses initial values of the preference weights established in a previous study in the Bay Area. After a series of operations, the Planner selects the two "best" itineraries which have the best and the second best objective function values. Then, the Planner presents the selected itineraries to the traveler. If the traveler is not satisfied with either itinerary, the Planner asks the traveler to indicate the itinerary that they prefer to the other. Based on the selection made by the user, the Planner updates the preference weights and re-selects another two itineraries. This process is repeated until the traveler is satisfied with one of the selected itineraries. A prototype is developed for downtown San Francisco. It is demonstrated that the Planner is capable of effectively generating alternative itineraries for a tour that involves multiple trips and multiple modes, with complex constraints, and that the Planner prototype serves as a practical tool for travelers in itinerary planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Kitamura, Ryuichi & Chen, Cynthia & Chen, Jiayu, 1999. "Daily Activity and Multimodal Travel Planner: Phase II Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5354w222, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5354w222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5354w222.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Gendreau & Alain Hertz & Gilbert Laporte, 1992. "New Insertion and Postoptimization Procedures for the Traveling Salesman Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1086-1094, December.
    2. Aksoy, Yasemin & Butler, Timothy W. & Minor, Elliott D., 1996. "Comparative studies in interactive multiple objective mathematical programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 408-422, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Ensor & Felipe Lillo, 2016. "Colored-Edge Graph Approach for the Modeling of Multimodal Transportation Systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(01), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baals, Julian & Emde, Simon & Turkensteen, Marcel, 2023. "Minimizing earliness-tardiness costs in supplier networks—A just-in-time truck routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 707-741.
    2. Olli Bräysy & Michel Gendreau, 2005. "Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows, Part II: Metaheuristics," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 119-139, February.
    3. Mohan, Srimathy & Gendreau, Michel & Rousseau, Jean-Marc, 2010. "Heuristics for the Stochastic Eulerian Tour Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 107-117, May.
    4. Ann M. Campbell & Barrett W. Thomas, 2008. "Probabilistic Traveling Salesman Problem with Deadlines," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Majed G. Alharbi & Ahmed Stohy & Mohammed Elhenawy & Mahmoud Masoud & Hamiden Abd El-Wahed Khalifa, 2021. "Solving Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Windows Using Hybrid Pointer Networks with Time Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Bernhard Fleischmann & Martin Gietz & Stefan Gnutzmann, 2004. "Time-Varying Travel Times in Vehicle Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 160-173, May.
    7. Zachariadis, Emmanouil E. & Tarantilis, Christos D. & Kiranoudis, Christos T., 2009. "A Guided Tabu Search for the Vehicle Routing Problem with two-dimensional loading constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 729-743, June.
    8. Keisuke Murakami, 2018. "Iterative Column Generation Algorithm for Generalized Multi-Vehicle Covering Tour Problem," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(04), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Bahram Alidaee & Haibo Wang, 2017. "A note on heuristic approach based on UBQP formulation of the maximum diversity problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(1), pages 102-110, January.
    10. Jeffrey W. Ohlmann & Barrett W. Thomas, 2007. "A Compressed-Annealing Heuristic for the Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Windows," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 80-90, February.
    11. Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata & Riera-Ledesma, Jorge, 2017. "The Traveling Purchaser Problem and its variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 1-18.
    12. Lu Chen & Kaisa Miettinen & Bin Xin & Vesa Ojalehto, 2023. "Comparing reference point based interactive multiobjective optimization methods without a human decision maker," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 757-788, March.
    13. I H Osman & S Ahmadi, 2007. "Guided construction search metaheuristics for the capacitated p-median problem with single source constraint," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(1), pages 100-114, January.
    14. Yossiri Adulyasak & Jean-François Cordeau & Raf Jans, 2014. "Formulations and Branch-and-Cut Algorithms for Multivehicle Production and Inventory Routing Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 103-120, February.
    15. Vidal, Thibaut & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Prins, Christian, 2013. "Heuristics for multi-attribute vehicle routing problems: A survey and synthesis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 1-21.
    16. I.N. Kamal Abadi & Nicholas G. Hall & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2000. "Minimizing Cycle Time in a Blocking Flowshop," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 177-180, February.
    17. C. Archetti & M. G. Speranza & A. Hertz, 2006. "A Tabu Search Algorithm for the Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 64-73, February.
    18. Leonardo Berbotto & Sergio García & Francisco Nogales, 2014. "A Randomized Granular Tabu Search heuristic for the split delivery vehicle routing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 153-173, November.
    19. Cattaruzza, Diego & Absi, Nabil & Feillet, Dominique & Vidal, Thibaut, 2014. "A memetic algorithm for the Multi Trip Vehicle Routing Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(3), pages 833-848.
    20. Gerardo Berbeglia & Jean-François Cordeau & Irina Gribkovskaia & Gilbert Laporte, 2007. "Static pickup and delivery problems: a classification scheme and survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(1), pages 1-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt5354w222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.