IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt42k1d96f.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

University of California, Davis Long-Range Development Plan: A Davis Smart Mobility Model

Author

Listed:
  • Shaheen, Susan
  • Rodier, Caroline J.
  • Finson, Rachel S.

Abstract

The goal of the Smart Mobility Model project was to optimize individual mobility options through improved connectivity among modes, enhanced techniques to link landuse planning and transportation system design, advanced information technologies, and clean-fuel vehicles. The California PATH/Caltrans partnership with the University of California, Davis (UC Davis) was initiated after campus planners expressed interest in learning how innovative mobility services and technologies (such as carsharing and smart parking management) might help to alleviate the transportation impacts of a campus expansion, expected to result in the arrival of more than 9,000 additional students, staff, and faculty in the coming decade. The campus is in the midst of a multi-year process to approve a Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) that will guide all aspects of this expansion. The study also focused on residents and impacts on Davis and the surrounding region.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Finson, Rachel S., 2003. "University of California, Davis Long-Range Development Plan: A Davis Smart Mobility Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt42k1d96f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt42k1d96f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42k1d96f.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaheen, Susan & Sperling, Daniel & Wagner, Conrad, 1998. "Carsharing in Europe and North American: Past, Present, and Future," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4gx4m05b, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Cervero, Robert, 1994. "Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 174-183, June.
    3. Shaheen, Susan A. & Sperling, Daniel & Wagner, Conrad, 1999. "A Short History of Carsharing in the 90's," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6p3305b0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Shaheen, Susan A. & Sperling, Daniel & Wagner, Conrad, 1999. "A Short History of Carsharing in the 90's," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6p3305b0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodier, Caroline & Shaheen, Susan A., 2003. "Carsharing and Carfree Housing: Predicted Travel, Emission, and Economic Benefits: A Case Study of the Sacramento, California Region," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8549598k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Shaheen, Susan, 2004. "University of California, Davis Long-Range Development Plan: A Davis Smart Mobility Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2wc2t2jt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Wagner, Sebastian & Brandt, Tobias & Neumann, Dirk, 2016. "In free float: Developing Business Analytics support for carsharing providers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PA), pages 4-14.
    4. Mounce, Richard & Nelson, John D., 2019. "On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 17-30.
    5. Shibayama, Takeru & Emberger, Günter, 2020. "New mobility services: Taxonomy, innovation and the role of ICTs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 79-90.
    6. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Cano, Lauren & Camel, Madonna, 2015. "Exploring Electric Vehicle Carsharing As A Mobility Option for Older Adults:A Case Study of A Senior Adult Community in The San Francisco Bay Area," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0cz5s74s, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson, 2014. "Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5tc324v0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    8. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0d84c2f4, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Cynthia Chen & Hongmian Gong & Robert Paaswell, 2008. "Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 285-299, May.
    10. Bo Wan & Xudan Zhao & Yuhan Sun & Tao Yang, 2023. "Unraveling the Impact of Spatial Configuration on TOD Function Mix Use and Spatial Intensity: An Analysis of 47 Morning Top-Flow Stations in Beijing (2018–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Qing Su, 2017. "Travel Demand Management Policy Instruments, Urban Spatial Characteristics, and Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Travel in the US Urban Areas," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 157-166.
    12. Liu, Tao & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2015. "Analysis of a new public-transport-service concept: Customized bus in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 63-76.
    13. Guang Tian & Reid Ewing & Rachel Weinberger & Kevin Shively & Preston Stinger & Shima Hamidi, 2017. "Trip and parking generation at transit-oriented developments: a case study of Redmond TOD, Seattle region," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1235-1254, September.
    14. Frans Sengers & Bruno Turnheim & Frans Berkhout, 2021. "Beyond experiments: Embedding outcomes in climate governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1148-1171, September.
    15. Shaheen, Susan A. & Meyn, Mollyanne & Wipyewski, Kamill, 2003. "U.S. Shared-use Vehicle Survey Findings: Opportunities and Obstacles for Carsharing and Station Car Growth," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt69x684m2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    16. Mariana de Oliveira Lage & Cláudia Aparecida Soares Machado & Cristiano Martins Monteiro & Clodoveu Augusto Davis & Charles Lincoln Kenji Yamamura & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti & José Alberto Quintanilh, 2021. "Using Hierarchical Facility Location, Single Facility Approach, and GIS in Carsharing Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Gurmu, Shiferaw & Ihlanfeldt, Keith R. & Smith, William J., 2008. "Does residential location matter to the employment of TANF recipients Evidence from a dynamic discrete choice model with unobserved effects," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 325-351, January.
    18. Luca Nitschke, 2020. "Reconstituting Automobility: The Influence of Non-Commercial Carsharing on the Meanings of Automobility and the Car," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2008. "Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt72p9n6qt, University of California Transportation Center.
    20. Peng, Ya-Ting & Li, Zhi-Chun & Choi, Keechoo, 2017. "Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 269-290.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt42k1d96f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.