IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt3tx5b17h.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development of an Adaptive Corridor Traffic Control Model

Author

Listed:
  • Recker, Will
  • Zhenhg, Xing
  • Chu, Lianyu

Abstract

This research develops and tests, via microscopic simulation, a real-time adaptive control system for corridor management in the form of three real-time adaptive control strategies: intersection control, ramp control and an integrated control that combines both intersection and ramp control. The development of these strategies is based on a mathematical representation that describes the behavior of traffic flow in corridor networks and actuated controller operation. Only those parameters commonly found in modern actuated controllers (e.g., Type 170 and 2070 controllers) are considered in the formulation of the optimal control problem. As a result, the proposed strategies easily could be implemented with minimal adaptation of existing field devices and the software that controls their operation. Microscopic simulation was employed to test and evaluate the performance of the proposed strategies in a calibrated network. Simulation results indicate that the proposed strategies are able to increase overall system performance and also the local performance on ramps and intersections. Prior to testing the complete model, separate tests were conducted to evaluate the intersection control model on: 1) an isolated intersection, and 2) a network of intersections along an arterial. The complete model was then tested and evaluated on the Alton Parkway/I-405 corridor network in Irvine, California. In testing the optimal control model, we simulated a variety of conditions on the freeway and arterial subsystems that cover the range of demand from peak to non-peak, incident to non-incident, conditions. The results of these experiments were evaluated against full-actuated operation and found to offer improved performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Recker, Will & Zhenhg, Xing & Chu, Lianyu, 2010. "Development of an Adaptive Corridor Traffic Control Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3tx5b17h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3tx5b17h
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3tx5b17h.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. C. D'Ans & D. C. Gazis, 1976. "Optimal Control of Oversaturated Store-and-Forward Transportation Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos, 2000. "A Linear Programming Model for the Single Destination System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 37-49, February.
    3. J. N. Darroch & G. F. Newell & R. W. J. Morris, 1964. "Queues for a Vehicle-Actuated Traffic Light," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 882-895, December.
    4. Per Hokstad, 1979. "Note--A Single Server Queue with Constant Service Time and Restricted Accessibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 205-208, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Recker, Will, 2008. "Development of an Adaptive Corridor Traffic Control Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1sq7049f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Yannis Pavlis & Will Recker, 2009. "A Mathematical Logic Approach for the Transformation of the Linear Conditional Piecewise Functions of Dispersion-and-Store and Cell Transmission Traffic Flow Models into Linear Mixed-Integer Form," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 98-116, February.
    3. Meng Li & Guowei Hua & Haijun Huang, 2018. "A Multi-Modal Route Choice Model with Ridesharing and Public Transit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    5. Yildirimoglu, Mehmet & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2014. "Approximating dynamic equilibrium conditions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 186-200.
    6. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Jiancheng Long & Wai Yuen Szeto, 2019. "Link-Based System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems in General Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 167-182, January.
    8. Wang, Hongping & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Resilience-oriented optimal post-disruption reconfiguration for coupled traffic-power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Jian Li & Kaan Ozbay, 2015. "Evacuation Planning with Endogenous Transportation Network Degradations: A Stochastic Cell-Based Model and Solution Procedure," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 677-696, September.
    10. Xinhua Mao & Jianwei Wang & Changwei Yuan & Wei Yu & Jiahua Gan, 2018. "A Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model for the Sustainability of Pavement Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. He, Sheng-Xue, 2016. "Will a higher free-flow speed lead us to a less congested freeway?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 17-38.
    12. Hediye Tuydes-Yaman & Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos, 2014. "Modeling demand management strategies for evacuations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 491-512, June.
    13. Xuedong Yan & Xiaobing Liu & Yulei Song, 2018. "Optimizing evacuation efficiency under emergency with consideration of social fairness based on a cell transmission model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    15. Pedro Cesar Lopes Gerum & Andrew Reed Benton & Melike Baykal-Gürsoy, 2019. "Traffic density on corridors subject to incidents: models for long-term congestion management," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(5), pages 795-831, December.
    16. Han, Ke & Friesz, Terry L. & Yao, Tao, 2013. "A partial differential equation formulation of Vickrey’s bottleneck model, part II: Numerical analysis and computation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 75-93.
    17. Denissa Sari Darmawi Purba & Eleftheria Kontou & Chrysafis Vogiatzis, 2021. "Evacuation Route Planning for Alternative Fuel Vehicles," Papers 2109.01578, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    18. Zhu, Feng & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2017. "Efficient and fair system states in dynamic transportation networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 272-289.
    19. Doan, Kien & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2012. "On the holding-back problem in the cell transmission based dynamic traffic assignment models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1218-1238.
    20. Kontorinaki, Maria & Spiliopoulou, Anastasia & Roncoli, Claudio & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2017. "First-order traffic flow models incorporating capacity drop: Overview and real-data validation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 52-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3tx5b17h. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.