IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt3g62m787.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of Cost-Effective Planning and Design Options for Bus Rapid Transit in Dedicated Bus Lanes

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jing-Quan
  • Song, Myoung Kyun
  • Li, Meng
  • Zhang, Wei-Bin
  • Miller, Mark

Abstract

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems with dedicated lanes have shown advantages over traditional bus systems and have attracted more transit riders. However, it is not always possible to build BRT systems with two dedicated lanes due to physical and cost constraints. A BRT system with a single dedicated lane is more practical and desirable in such situations. In a single lane configuration, buses approaching from opposite directions share the same road section and can overtake or pass each other only at the bus stops. We propose an optimization model to describe the synchronization requirements of the BRT buses with the objective to minimize the total travel and dwell time. The computational results show that a BRT system with a single dedicated lane yields similar total travel time to a BRT system with double dedicated lanes when the headway is not very short (e.g., more than 20 minutes). In addition, in order to manage the possible delay at intersections, a simple speed control algorithm is implemented to adjust the bus speed in real-time if the bus is delayed considerably. A microscopic simulation based on the simulation tool VISSIM is conducted to examine the impact of the BRT bus on other traffic and the performance of the speed control. The simulation result shows that the speed control effectively handles the delay at the intersection and that other traffic is rarely impacted by the speed control.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jing-Quan & Song, Myoung Kyun & Li, Meng & Zhang, Wei-Bin & Miller, Mark, 2009. "Evaluation of Cost-Effective Planning and Design Options for Bus Rapid Transit in Dedicated Bus Lanes," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3g62m787, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3g62m787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3g62m787.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carey, Malachy & Crawford, Ivan, 2007. "Scheduling trains on a network of busy complex stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 159-178, February.
    2. Carey, Malachy, 1994. "A model and strategy for train pathing with choice of lines, platforms, and routes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 333-353, October.
    3. Gerald G. Brown & Clark E. Goodman & R. Kevin Wood, 1990. "Annual Scheduling of Atlantic Fleet Naval Combatants," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 249-259, April.
    4. Alberto Caprara & Matteo Fischetti & Paolo Toth, 2002. "Modeling and Solving the Train Timetabling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 851-861, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Yusin & Chen, Chuen-Yih, 2009. "A heuristic for the train pathing and timetabling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 837-851, September.
    2. Zhou, Wenliang & Teng, Hualiang, 2016. "Simultaneous passenger train routing and timetabling using an efficient train-based Lagrangian relaxation decomposition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 409-439.
    3. Meng, Lingyun & Zhou, Xuesong, 2014. "Simultaneous train rerouting and rescheduling on an N-track network: A model reformulation with network-based cumulative flow variables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 208-234.
    4. Tian, Xiaopeng & Niu, Huimin, 2020. "Optimization of demand-oriented train timetables under overtaking operations: A surrogate-dual-variable column generation for eliminating indivisibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 143-173.
    5. Xu, Xiaoming & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2021. "Train timetabling with stop-skipping, passenger flow, and platform choice considerations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 52-74.
    6. Lee, Yusin & Lu, Li-Sin & Wu, Mei-Ling & Lin, Dung-Ying, 2017. "Balance of efficiency and robustness in passenger railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 142-156.
    7. Li, Feng & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Gao, Zi-You, 2014. "Deadlock analysis, prevention and train optimal travel mechanism in single-track railway system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 385-414.
    8. Elio Canestrelli & Marco Corazza & Giuseppe Nadai & Raffaele Pesenti, 2017. "Managing the Ship Movements in the Port of Venice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 861-887, September.
    9. Xiaoming Xu & Keping Li & Lixing Yang & Ziyou Gao, 2019. "An efficient train scheduling algorithm on a single-track railway system," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 85-105, February.
    10. Niu, Huimin & Zhou, Xuesong & Gao, Ruhu, 2015. "Train scheduling for minimizing passenger waiting time with time-dependent demand and skip-stop patterns: Nonlinear integer programming models with linear constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 117-135.
    11. Min, Yun-Hong & Park, Myoung-Ju & Hong, Sung-Pil & Hong, Soon-Heum, 2011. "An appraisal of a column-generation-based algorithm for centralized train-conflict resolution on a metropolitan railway network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 409-429, February.
    12. Wenliang Zhou & Junli Tian & Jin Qin & Lianbo Deng & TangJian Wei, 2015. "Optimization of Multiperiod Mixed Train Schedule on High-Speed Railway," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-14, April.
    13. Flamini, Marta & Pacciarelli, Dario, 2008. "Real time management of a metro rail terminus," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 746-761, September.
    14. Barrena, Eva & Canca, David & Coelho, Leandro C. & Laporte, Gilbert, 2014. "Single-line rail rapid transit timetabling under dynamic passenger demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 134-150.
    15. Xueqiao Yu & Maoxiang Lang & Wenhui Zhang & Shiqi Li & Mingyue Zhang & Xiao Yu, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Comprehensive Optimization Method of a Train Diagram of the China High Speed Railway Express," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, April.
    16. Lu, Gongyuan & Ning, Jia & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2022. "Train platforming and rescheduling with flexible interlocking mechanisms: An aggregate approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Zhou, Xuesong & Zhong, Ming, 2007. "Single-track train timetabling with guaranteed optimality: Branch-and-bound algorithms with enhanced lower bounds," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 320-341, March.
    18. Shi Qiang Liu & Erhan Kozan, 2011. "Scheduling Trains with Priorities: A No-Wait Blocking Parallel-Machine Job-Shop Scheduling Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 175-198, May.
    19. Matthew E. H. Petering & Mojtaba Heydar & Dietrich R. Bergmann, 2016. "Mixed-Integer Programming for Railway Capacity Analysis and Cyclic, Combined Train Timetabling and Platforming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 892-909, August.
    20. Burdett, R.L. & Kozan, E., 2009. "Techniques for inserting additional trains into existing timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 821-836, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt3g62m787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.