IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt33w2d55j.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development and Performance Evaluation of AVCSS Deployment Sequences to Advance from Today's Driving Environment to Full Automation

Author

Listed:
  • Shladover, Steven
  • VanderWerf, Joel
  • Miller, Mark A.
  • Kourjanskaia, Natalia
  • Krishnan, Hariharan

Abstract

This report presents the findings of its investigation into deployment sequences to better understand the paths that could be taken from today's driving environment to vehicle-highway automation. One of the most vexing problems has always been that of determining how to advance from the present-day manually-controlled vehicles to the future fully automated vehicles. Considerable research attention has been devoted to defining the architecture and operating protocols, as well as the technology, of automated highway systems. Rather less attention has been devoted to defining the steps by which we can get there. Initially, targets of opportunity were identified for accelerating progress toward highway automation, taking account of the operational constraints. Next, after reviewing existing literature on automated highway systems deployment, a set of principles to govern the design of deployment strategies is suggested followed by proposed deployment sequences for automated highway systems, beginning with adaptive cruise control and then adding elements of vehicle-vehicle cooperation and lane protection to build toward automated highway systems capabilities within constraints of technological, human factors and economic feasibility. A general deployment staging sequence is then presented along with example deployment "roadmaps" shown for transit buses, heavy trucks and light-duty passenger vehicles. Finally, we discuss the findings of our modeling and evaluation work for the beginning stages of a specific deployment sequence for light-duty passenger vehicles in the setting of a single highway lane. This sequence incorporates the use of cooperative adaptive cruise control along with conventional or autonomous adaptive cruise control and manual-driven vehicles. The evaluation assesses the impact of each of these three operational driving modes on traffic flow dynamics and highway capacity as well as of increasing proportions of both autonomous and cooperative adaptive cruise control vehicles relative to manually driven vehicles. Such effects are difficult to estimate from field tests on highways because of their necessarily low market penetration of these vehicles. Our approach uses Monte Carlo simulations based on detailed modeling work to estimate the quantitative effects of varying proportions of vehicle control types on lane capacity and on queue lengths and wait times at on-ramps.

Suggested Citation

  • Shladover, Steven & VanderWerf, Joel & Miller, Mark A. & Kourjanskaia, Natalia & Krishnan, Hariharan, 2001. "Development and Performance Evaluation of AVCSS Deployment Sequences to Advance from Today's Driving Environment to Full Automation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt33w2d55j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt33w2d55j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/33w2d55j.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shladover, Steven E. & Nowakowski, Christopher & Cody, Delphine & Bu, Fanping & O’Connell, Jessica & Spring, John & Dickey, Susan & Nelson, David, 2009. "Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic Flow: Testing Drivers' Choices of Following Distances," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0sm5632n, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Vincent A.C. van den Berg & Erik T. Verhoef, 2015. "Robot Cars and Dynamic Bottleneck Congestion: The Effects on Capacity, Value of Time and Preference Heterogeneity," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-062/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 11 Jul 2016.
    3. Ghiasi, Amir & Hussain, Omar & Qian, Zhen (Sean) & Li, Xiaopeng, 2017. "A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 266-292.
    4. Li, Xiaopeng, 2022. "Trade-off between safety, mobility and stability in automated vehicle following control: An analytical method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-18.
    5. Nowakowski, Christopher & Shladover, Steven E. & Cody, Delphine & Bu, Fanping & O’Connell, Jessica & Spring, John & Dickey, Susan & Nelson, David, 2011. "Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Testing Drivers’ Choices of Following Distances," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8n7871x0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Nowakowski, Christopher & Shladover, Steven E. & Cody, Delphine & Bu, Fanping & O’Connell, Jessica & Spring, John & Dickey, Susan & Nelson, David, 2010. "Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Testing Drivers’ Choices of Following Distances," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt58s2t0k3, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Gong, Siyuan & Shen, Jinglai & Du, Lili, 2016. "Constrained optimization and distributed computation based car following control of a connected and autonomous vehicle platoon," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 314-334.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt33w2d55j. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.