IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt1cm7z3rd.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Safety Performance of High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Facilities: Evaluation of HOV Lane Configurations in California

Author

Listed:
  • Jang, Kitae
  • Chung, Koohong
  • Ragland, David R
  • Chan, Ching-Yao

Abstract

Collision data from High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) facilities with two different types of access, continuous and limited, are examined in this paper. The findings show that HOV facilities with limited access offer no safety advantages over those with a continuous access. Compared with continuous access HOV lanes, a higher percentage of collisions was concentrated on limited access HOV lanes. Limited access HOV lanes also had higher collision rates. Findings from investigating the relationship between collision rates in HOV lanes with respect to shoulder width, length of access, and the proximity of access to its neighboring ramps are also documented. These findings provide enhanced understanding about the effects of geometric factors on the collision rates in HOV lanes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jang, Kitae & Chung, Koohong & Ragland, David R & Chan, Ching-Yao, 2009. "Safety Performance of High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Facilities: Evaluation of HOV Lane Configurations in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1cm7z3rd, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt1cm7z3rd
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1cm7z3rd.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. S. Sichel, 1973. "On a Significance Test for Two Poisson Variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 22(1), pages 50-58, March.
    2. Wei‐Kei Shiue & Lee J. Bain, 1982. "Experiment Size and Power Comparisons for Two‐Sample Poisson Tests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(2), pages 130-134, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shan, Xiaonian & Hao, Peng & Boriboonsomsin, Kanok & Wu, Guoyuan & Barth, Matthew & Chen, Xiaohong, 2018. "Partially limited access control design for special-use freeway lanes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 25-37.
    2. Eui-Jin Kim & Oh Hoon Kwon & Shin Hyoung Park & Dong-Kyu Kim & Koohong Chung, 2021. "Application of naïve Bayesian approach in detecting reproducible fatal collision locations on freeway," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ng, H.K.T. & Gu, K. & Tang, M.L., 2007. "A comparative study of tests for the difference of two Poisson means," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 3085-3099, March.
    2. Michael P Lake & Louis-S Bouchard, 2017. "Targeted nanodiamonds for identification of subcellular protein assemblies in mammalian cells," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. James Stamey & Dean Young & Tom Bratcher, 2006. "Bayesian sample-size determination for one and two Poisson rate parameters with applications to quality control," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 583-594.
    4. Jang, Kitae & Chan, Ching-Yao, 2009. "HOV Lane Configurations and Safety Performance of California Freeways – An Investigation of Differential Distributions and Statistical Analysis," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5sq7r65r, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; safeTREC;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt1cm7z3rd. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.