IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt9t95p3gk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cars and Chargers in the Country: Rural PEV Owner Accounts of Charging and Travel in California

Author

Listed:
  • Robinson, Anya R.
  • Hardman, Scott PhD

Abstract

Under the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) rule, California must move to 100% zero emission vehicle (ZEV) sales by 2035. Tomake this transition equitable, it is important to understand how we can support ZEV adoption in all communities–including rural communities. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences and perceptions of current rural plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) owners, identify barriers to charging and ownership, and suggest factors to guide the development of infrastructure in rural areas. (PEVs include battery-electric vehicles [BEVs] and plug-in hybrid vehicles.) Semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural PEV owners and included questions related to travel behavior, at-home and public charging experiences, and motivation for household vehicle purchase. Major themes were extracted from the interviews including that PHEV owners tend to have minimal at-home and public charging requirements, while BEV owners require access to Level 2 charging at home and reliable fast charging in public spaces. Additionally, the magnitude of public charging reliability and availability issues appear to be greater in rural than non-rural areas. Grid reliability issues and specific vehicle requirements were also points of discussion among rural PEV owners. The findings of this report could inform policy makers, car manufacturers, and PEV charging companies to better serve rural communities in the transition to 100% PEV sales.

Suggested Citation

  • Robinson, Anya R. & Hardman, Scott PhD, 2024. "Cars and Chargers in the Country: Rural PEV Owner Accounts of Charging and Travel in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9t95p3gk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9t95p3gk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9t95p3gk.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salon, Deborah, 2015. "Heterogeneity in the relationship between the built environment and driving: Focus on neighborhood type and travel purpose," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 34-45.
    2. Barajas, Jesus M & Wang, Weijing, 2023. "Mobility Justice in Rural California: Examining Transportation Barriers and Adaptations in Carless Households," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0dv3b769, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2023. "Comparisons of observed and unobserved parameter heterogeneity in modeling vehicle-miles driven," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Faizeh Hatami & Jean-Claude Thill, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evaluation of the Built Environment’s Impact on Commuting Duration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    4. Evan Iacobucci, 2024. "“Would it be weird to live here without a car?”: Using social media to understand car ownership decisions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 475-500, April.
    5. Feuillet, Thierry & Bulteau, Julie & Dantan, Sophie, 2021. "Modelling context-specific relationships between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and private car use," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Tao, Tao & Cao, Jason, 2024. "Ineffective built environment interventions: How to reduce driving in American suburbs?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2018. "Taste heterogeneity as an alternative form of endogeneity bias: Investigating the attitude-moderated effects of built environment and socio-demographics on vehicle ownership using latent class modelin," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 130-150.
    8. Charles Raux & Ayana Lamatkhanova & Lény Grassot, 2021. "Does the built environment shape commuting? The case of Lyon (France)," Post-Print halshs-03010833, HAL.
    9. Rodier, Caroline, 2018. "The Effects of Ride Hailing Services on Travel and Associated Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2rv570tt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. David R. Heres & Rafael Dávila-Bugarín, 2020. "The impact of urban form on vehicle fuel consumption in Mexican metropolitan areas," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 97(01), pages 241-263.
    11. Yongsung Lee & Giovanni Circella & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Subhrajit Guhathakurta, 2020. "Are millennials more multimodal? A latent-class cluster analysis with attitudes and preferences among millennial and Generation X commuters in California," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2505-2528, October.
    12. Charles Raux & Ayana Lamatkhanova & Lény Grassot, 2020. "Does the built environment shape commuting? The case of Lyon (France)," Working Papers halshs-03010833, HAL.
    13. Circella, Giovanni & Alemi, Farzad & Tiedeman, Kate & Berliner, Rosaria M & Lee, Yongsung & Fulton, Lew & Mokhtarian, Patricia L & Handy , Susan, 2017. "What Affects Millennials’ Mobility? PART II: The Impact of Residential Location, Individual Preferences and Lifestyles on Young Adults’ Travel Behavior in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5kc117kj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Ao, Yibin & Yang, Dujuan & Chen, Chuan & Wang, Yan, 2019. "Exploring the effects of the rural built environment on household car ownership after controlling for preference and attitude: Evidence from Sichuan, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 24-36.
    15. Malik, Jai & Bunch, David S. & Handy, Susan & Circella, Giovanni, 2021. "A deeper investigation into the effect of the built environment on the use of ridehailing for non-work travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Brown, Austin L. & Sperling, Daniel & Austin, Bernadette & DeShazo, JR & Fulton, Lew & Lipman, Timothy & Murphy, Colin W & Saphores, Jean Daniel & Tal, Gil & Abrams, Carolyn & Chakraborty, Debapriya &, 2021. "Driving California’s Transportation Emissions to Zero," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3np3p2t0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Ada Wolny & Marek Ogryzek & Ryszard Źróbek, 2019. "Towards Sustainable Development and Preventing Exclusions—Determining Road Accessibility at the Sub-Regional and Local Level in Rural Areas of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Erik Elldér & Katarina Haugen & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2022. "When local access matters: A detailed analysis of place, neighbourhood amenities and travel choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 120-139, January.
    19. Hernández-Tamurejo, Álvaro & Saiz-Sepúlveda, Álvaro & Lacárcel, Francisco Javier S., 2024. "Are urban mobility policies favoring the purchase of new vehicles?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Chakraborty, Debapriya & Bunch, David S. & Xu, Bingzheng & Brownstone, David & Tal, Gil, 2021. "Plug-in Electric Vehicle Diffusion in California: Role of Exposure to New Technology at Home and Work," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7fs8295j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences; Zero emission vehicles; electric vehicles; electric vehicle charging; travel behavior; rural areas; transportation equity;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9t95p3gk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.