IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt4k87b3sk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of Sensing Errors on Headway Design: From α-Fair Group Safety to Traffic Throughput

Author

Listed:
  • Shao, Wei
  • Fan, Zejun
  • Chen, Chia-Ju
  • Zhang, Zhaofeng
  • Ma, Jiaqi PhD
  • Zhang, Junshan PhD

Abstract

Headway, namely the distance between vehicles, is a key design factor for ensuring the safe operation of autonomous driving systems. There have been studies on headway optimization based on the speeds of leading and trailing vehicles, assuming perfect sensing capabilities. In practical scenarios, however, sensing errors are inevitable, calling for a more robust headway design to mitigate the risk of collision. Undoubtedly, augmenting the safety distance would reduce traffic throughput, highlighting the need for headway design to incorporate both sensing errors and risk tolerance models. In addition, prioritizing group safety over individual safety is often deemed unacceptable because no driver should sacrifice their safety for the safety of others. In this study, we propose a multi-objective optimization framework that examines the impact of sensing errors on both traffic throughput and the fairness of safety among vehicles. The proposed framework provides a solution to determine the Pareto frontier for traffic throughput and vehicle safety. ComDrive, a communication-based autonomous driving simulation platform, is developed to validate the proposed approach. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms existing baselines.

Suggested Citation

  • Shao, Wei & Fan, Zejun & Chen, Chia-Ju & Zhang, Zhaofeng & Ma, Jiaqi PhD & Zhang, Junshan PhD, 2024. "Impact of Sensing Errors on Headway Design: From α-Fair Group Safety to Traffic Throughput," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4k87b3sk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt4k87b3sk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4k87b3sk.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denos C. Gazis & Robert Herman & Richard W. Rothery, 1961. "Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 545-567, August.
    2. Lily Elefteriadou, 2014. "An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-8435-6, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Roveri & Antonio Carcaterra & Leonardo Molinari & Gianluca Pepe, 2020. "Safe and Secure Control of Swarms of Vehicles by Small-World Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Nakata, Makoto & Yamauchi, Atsuo & Tanimoto, Jun & Hagishima, Aya, 2010. "Dilemma game structure hidden in traffic flow at a bottleneck due to a 2 into 1 lane junction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(23), pages 5353-5361.
    3. McCrea, Jennifer & Moutari, Salissou, 2010. "A hybrid macroscopic-based model for traffic flow in road networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 676-684, December.
    4. Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2012. "Prediction and field validation of traffic oscillation propagation under nonlinear car-following laws," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 409-423.
    5. Coifman, Benjamin & Ponnu, Balaji, 2020. "Adjacent lane dependencies modulating wave velocity on congested freeways-An empirical study," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 84-99.
    6. Zhang, H.M. & Kim, T., 2005. "A car-following theory for multiphase vehicular traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 385-399, June.
    7. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    8. Rehborn, Hubert & Klenov, Sergey L. & Palmer, Jochen, 2011. "An empirical study of common traffic congestion features based on traffic data measured in the USA, the UK, and Germany," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4466-4485.
    9. Yifan Pan & Yongjiang Wang & Baobin Miao & Rongjun Cheng, 2022. "Stabilization Strategy of a Novel Car-Following Model with Time Delay and Memory Effect of the Driver," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Zhang, Xiaoyan & Jarrett, David F., 1997. "Stability analysis of the classical car-following model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 441-462, November.
    11. Tian, Junfang & Li, Guangyu & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 560-575.
    12. Fang, Yaling & Shi, Zhongke, 2015. "Chaos analysis and delayed-feedback control in a discrete dynamic coupled map traffic model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 422(C), pages 40-46.
    13. Kerner, Boris S., 2016. "Failure of classical traffic flow theories: Stochastic highway capacity and automatic driving," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 450(C), pages 700-747.
    14. Jinhua Tan & Li Gong & Xuqian Qin, 2019. "Global Optimality under Internet of Vehicles: Strategy to Improve Traffic Safety and Reduce Energy Dissipation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.
    16. Calvert, Simeon C. & Schakel, Wouter J. & van Lint, J.W.C., 2020. "A generic multi-scale framework for microscopic traffic simulation part II – Anticipation Reliance as compensation mechanism for potential task overload," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 42-63.
    17. Jin, Wen-Long, 2012. "A kinematic wave theory of multi-commodity network traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1000-1022.
    18. Kun Zhang & Yu Xue & Hao-Jie Luo & Qiang Zhang & Yuan Tang & Bing-Ling Cen, 2023. "Cyber-attacks on the optimal velocity and its variation by bifurcation analyses," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(12), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Tamra Heberling & Lisa Davis & Jakub Gedeon & Charles Morgan & Tomáš Gedeon, 2016. "A Mechanistic Model for Cooperative Behavior of Co-transcribing RNA Polymerases," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-38, August.
    20. Treiber, Martin & Kanagaraj, Venkatesan, 2015. "Comparing numerical integration schemes for time-continuous car-following models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 183-195.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt4k87b3sk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.