IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt1cf2j4zk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Advancing Understanding of Long-Distance and Intercity Travel with Diverse Data Sources

Author

Listed:
  • Dowds, Jonathan
  • Harvey, Chester
  • LaMondia, Jeff
  • Howerter, Sarah
  • Ullman, Hannah
  • Aultman-Hall, Lisa

Abstract

Long-distance travel is an ambiguous designation that is used to refer to an extremely diverse set of trips, differing from one another in mode, distance, and purpose. Long-distance travel encompasses everything from "short" long-distance surface trips between adjacent metropolitan areas through intercontinental air trips spanning thousands of miles. These trips serve a wide range of purposes including business travel, leisure travel, and travel to access essential services such as medical care. As such, long-distance travel is increasingly important for sustainable transportation planning both due to the environmental externalities associated with these trips and also because the benefits of access to long-distance travel are inequitably distributed throughout the population. This project drew on five survey datasets, a mobile-device based dataset from AirSage Inc., and semi-structured interviews to address research questions related to how best to measure long-distance travel, how long-distance travel influences well-being, and how access to long-distance travel varies among socio-demographic groups. Historically, transportation equity research has focused on access to local goods and services but access to long-distance travel and to more distant destinations is increasingly important for maintaining social networks and accessing economic opportunities and specialized services. Across multiple datasets in this project, there is ample evidence that lower-income individuals engage in less long-distance travel and have more unmet long-distance travel needs than their higher-income counterparts. Given both the theoretical and empirical evidence that long-distance and intercity travel is correlated with an individuals’ own sense of well-being, especially for leisure or personal purposes, inequitable access to long-distance travel cannot be ignored. This finding suggests generally that lack of equity in long-distance access has been masked by lack of data and is a policy concern that must be considered in sustainable transportation planning moving forward. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Dowds, Jonathan & Harvey, Chester & LaMondia, Jeff & Howerter, Sarah & Ullman, Hannah & Aultman-Hall, Lisa, 2018. "Advancing Understanding of Long-Distance and Intercity Travel with Diverse Data Sources," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1cf2j4zk, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt1cf2j4zk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1cf2j4zk.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lei Zhang & Frank Southworth & Chenfeng Xiong & Anthon Sonnenberg, 2012. "Methodological Options and Data Sources for the Development of Long-Distance Passenger Travel Demand Models: A Comprehensive Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 399-433, April.
    2. Jeffrey LaMondia & Chandra Bhat, 2012. "A conceptual and methodological framework of leisure activity loyalty accommodating the travel context," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 321-349, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonas De Vos, 2019. "Analysing the effect of trip satisfaction on satisfaction with the leisure activity at the destination of the trip, in relationship with life satisfaction," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 623-645, June.
    2. Yijing Lu & Lei Zhang, 2015. "Imputing trip purposes for long-distance travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 581-595, July.
    3. Thompson, C.A. & Saxberg, K. & Lega, J. & Tong, D. & Brown, H.E., 2019. "A cumulative gravity model for inter-urban spatial interaction at different scales," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Fu, Xingxing & van Lierop, Dea & Ettema, Dick, 2024. "Is multimodality advantageous? Assessing the relationship between multimodality and perceived transport adequacy and accessibility in different travel contexts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Xiaomei Lin & Yusak O. Susilo & Chunfu Shao & Chengxi Liu, 2018. "The Implication of Road Toll Discount for Mode Choice: Intercity Travel during the Chinese Spring Festival Holiday," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Ruiz, Tomás & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2016. "Scheduling decision styles on leisure and social activities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 304-317.
    7. Lee, Kuan-Huei & Scott, Noel & Packer, Jan, 2014. "Habitus and food lifestyle: In-destination activity participation of Slow Food members," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 207-220.
    8. Mattson, Jeremy & Hough, Jill & Varma, Amiy, 2018. "Estimating demand for rural intercity bus services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 68-75.
    9. Konrad Steiner & Stefan Irnich, 2018. "Schedule-Based Integrated Intercity Bus Line Planning via Branch-and-Cut," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 882-897, August.
    10. Wang, Bobin & Shao, Chunfu & Ji, Xun, 2017. "Dynamic analysis of holiday travel behaviour with integrated multimodal travel information usage: A life-oriented approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 255-280.
    11. Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim, 2018. "An Analysis of the Relationship between Land Use and Weekend Travel: Focusing on the Internal Capture of Trips," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Lisa Aultman-Hall & Chester Harvey & James Sullivan & Jeffrey J. LaMondia, 2018. "The implications of long-distance tour attributes for national travel data collection in the United States," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 875-903, May.
    13. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Batur, Irfan & Dirks, Abbie & Pendyala, Ram M. & Bhat, Chandra R., 2024. "An investigation of individual-level telework arrangements in the COVID-era," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Kabiri, Aliakbar & Ghader, Sepehr & Zhang, Lei, 2024. "Use of passive data for determining link level long distance trips," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Bobin Wang & Chunfu Shao & Xun Ji, 2017. "Influencing Mechanism Analysis of Holiday Activity–Travel Patterns on Transportation Energy Consumption and Emissions in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Konrad Steiner & Stefan Irnich, 2016. "Schedule-based integrated inter-city bus line planning via branch-and-cut," Working Papers 1608, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    17. Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim, 2017. "Full Random Coefficients Multilevel Modeling of the Relationship between Land Use and Trip Time on Weekdays and Weekends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Gramsch-Calvo, Benjamin & Axhausen, Kay W., 2024. "Exploring the influence of social relations and knowledge of the urban environment on leisure travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Data analysis; Data fusion; Intercity travel; Longitudinal studies; Travel behavior; Travel demand; Travel surveys;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt1cf2j4zk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.