IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt6bk9b677.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

American Legacy Foundation, Using Multiple Strategies in Tobacco Use Prevention Education

Author

Listed:
  • Dana L. Wenter, MPH
  • Sondra Blackwell, MEd
  • Kevin C. Davis, MA
  • Matthew C. Farrelly, PhD

Abstract

This report focuses the extent to which four types of prevention education strategies measured in the 2000 National Youth Tobacco Survey are being impplemented in schools. It assess whether students believe that tobacco use prevention education programs contribute to their decision not to smoke. The report also compares attitudes and beliefs about smoking among those students who receive fewer smoking prevention education strategies to those who receive more. Furthermore, it determines association between smoking status and receipt of multiple prevention education strategies. Results from the 2000 NYTS suggest that multistrategy prevention education may be effective in reinforcing anitobacco attitudes and curbing youth smoking. Research supports implementation of multistrategy prevention programs because they can result in increased knowledge about tobacco use, positive attitutes about being a non-smoker, and overall decreased amounts of youth smoking.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana L. Wenter, MPH & Sondra Blackwell, MEd & Kevin C. Davis, MA & Matthew C. Farrelly, PhD, 2002. "American Legacy Foundation, Using Multiple Strategies in Tobacco Use Prevention Education," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt6bk9b677, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt6bk9b677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6bk9b677.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellickson, P.L. & Bell, R.M. & McGuigan, K., 1993. "Preventing adolescent drug use: Long-term results of a junior high program," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(6), pages 856-861.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji Yan & Sally Brocksen, 2013. "Adolescent risk perception, substance use, and educational attainment," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 1037-1055, September.
    2. D.M. Gorman, 1998. "The Irrelevance of Evidence in the Development of School-Based Drug Prevention Policy, 1986-1996," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 118-146, February.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:5572 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sechrest, Lee & Sidani, Souraya, 1995. "Quantitative and qualitative methods: : Is There an Alternative?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 77-87.
    5. Dennis M. Gorman & J. Charles Huber Jr, 2009. "The Social Construction of ``Evidence-Based'' Drug Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(4), pages 396-414, August.
    6. Steven A. Gilham & Wayne L. Lucas & David Sivewright, 1997. "The Impact of Drug Education and Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(5), pages 589-613, October.
    7. Allison Gruner Gandhi & Erin Murphy-Graham & Anthony Petrosino & Sara Schwartz Chrismer & Carol H. Weiss, 2007. "The Devil Is in the Details," Evaluation Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 43-74, February.
    8. Gorman, Dennis M. & Conde, Eugenia, 2010. "The making of evidence-based practice: The case of Project ALERT," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 214-222, February.
    9. Beau Kilmer & Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, 2010. "Preventing Drug Use," NBER Chapters, in: Targeting Investments in Children: Fighting Poverty When Resources Are Limited, pages 181-220, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Katarzyna Jóźwiak & Mirjam Moerbeek, 2012. "Power Analysis for Trials With Discrete-Time Survival Endpoints," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(5), pages 630-654, October.
    11. Brian Gill & P. Mike Timpane & Karen E. Ross & Dominic J. Brewer & Kevin Booker, "undated". "Rhetoric Versus Reality: What We Know and What We Need to Know About Vouchers and Charter Schools," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 89d65ce14efd402a9de58cf93, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cigarette; Youth Smoking;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt6bk9b677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.