IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v18y1995i1p77-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative and qualitative methods: : Is There an Alternative?

Author

Listed:
  • Sechrest, Lee
  • Sidani, Souraya

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sechrest, Lee & Sidani, Souraya, 1995. "Quantitative and qualitative methods: : Is There an Alternative?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 77-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:18:y:1995:i:1:p:77-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0149-7189(94)00051-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bednarz, Dan, 1985. "Quantity and quality in evaluation research: A divergent view," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 289-306, January.
    2. Roter, Debra & Frankel, Richard, 1992. "Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1097-1103, May.
    3. Ellickson, P.L. & Bell, R.M. & McGuigan, K., 1993. "Preventing adolescent drug use: Long-term results of a junior high program," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(6), pages 856-861.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leila Hurmerinta-Peltomäki & Niina Nummela, 2006. "Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 439-459, August.
    2. Jerrell, Jeanette M. & Ridgely, M. Susan, 1999. "The relative impact of treatment program `robustness' and `dosage' on client outcomes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 323-330, August.
    3. Fitzgerald, Joan & Rasheed, Janice Matthews, 1998. "Salvaging an evaluation from the swampy lowland," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 199-209, May.
    4. Anthony Onwuegbuzie, 2003. "Effect Sizes in Qualitative Research: A Prolegomenon," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 393-409, November.
    5. Anthony Onwuegbuzie & Nancy Leech, 2007. "Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 233-249, April.
    6. Hentschel, Jesko, 1998. "Distinguishing between types of data and methods of collecting them," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1914, The World Bank.
    7. Charette, Margot & Berrang-Ford, Lea & Llanos-Cuentas, Elmer Alejandro & Cárcamo, César & Kulkarni, Manisha, 2017. "What caused the 2012 dengue outbreak in Pucallpa, Peru? A socio-ecological autopsy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 122-132.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji Yan & Sally Brocksen, 2013. "Adolescent risk perception, substance use, and educational attainment," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 1037-1055, September.
    2. Dana L. Wenter, MPH & Sondra Blackwell, MEd & Kevin C. Davis, MA & Matthew C. Farrelly, PhD, 2002. "American Legacy Foundation, Using Multiple Strategies in Tobacco Use Prevention Education," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt6bk9b677, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    3. Gorman, Dennis M. & Conde, Eugenia, 2010. "The making of evidence-based practice: The case of Project ALERT," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 214-222, February.
    4. Radley, Alan & Mayberry, John & Pearce, Melanie, 2008. "Time, space and opportunity in the outpatient consultation: 'The doctor's story'," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 1484-1496, April.
    5. Beau Kilmer & Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, 2010. "Preventing Drug Use," NBER Chapters, in: Targeting Investments in Children: Fighting Poverty When Resources Are Limited, pages 181-220, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Katarzyna Jóźwiak & Mirjam Moerbeek, 2012. "Power Analysis for Trials With Discrete-Time Survival Endpoints," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(5), pages 630-654, October.
    7. Brian Gill & P. Mike Timpane & Karen E. Ross & Dominic J. Brewer & Kevin Booker, "undated". "Rhetoric Versus Reality: What We Know and What We Need to Know About Vouchers and Charter Schools," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 89d65ce14efd402a9de58cf93, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. D.M. Gorman, 1998. "The Irrelevance of Evidence in the Development of School-Based Drug Prevention Policy, 1986-1996," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 118-146, February.
    9. repec:mpr:mprres:5572 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Collins, Sarah & Drew, Paul & Watt, Ian & Entwistle, Vikki, 2005. "'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2611-2627, December.
    11. Epstein, Ronald M. & Franks, Peter & Fiscella, Kevin & Shields, Cleveland G. & Meldrum, Sean C. & Kravitz, Richard L. & Duberstein, Paul R., 2005. "Measuring patient-centered communication in Patient-Physician consultations: Theoretical and practical issues," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1516-1528, October.
    12. Dennis M. Gorman & J. Charles Huber Jr, 2009. "The Social Construction of ``Evidence-Based'' Drug Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 33(4), pages 396-414, August.
    13. Steven A. Gilham & Wayne L. Lucas & David Sivewright, 1997. "The Impact of Drug Education and Prevention Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(5), pages 589-613, October.
    14. Allison Gruner Gandhi & Erin Murphy-Graham & Anthony Petrosino & Sara Schwartz Chrismer & Carol H. Weiss, 2007. "The Devil Is in the Details," Evaluation Review, , vol. 31(1), pages 43-74, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:18:y:1995:i:1:p:77-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.