Institutional Versus Academic Discipline Measures of Student Experience: A Matter of Relative Validity
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Zwick, Rebecca & Brown, Terran & Sklar, Jeffrey C., 2004. "California and the SAT: A Reanalysis of University of California Admissions Data," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt9hf3t044, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Gregg Thomson, 2011. "DIVERSITY MATTERS: New Directions for Institutional Research on Undergraduate Racial/Ethnic and Economic Diversity," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt0k62w21b, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
- Gregg Thomson and John Aubrey Douglass, 2009. "Decoding Learning Gains: Measuring Outcomes and the Pivotal Role of the Major and Student Backgrounds," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt2173006c, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
- Steven Brint, 2009. "THE ACADEMIC DEVOLUTION? Movements to Reform Teaching and Learning in US Colleges and Universities, 1985-2010," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt18j2m7kh, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Dur, Robert & Glazer, Amihai, 2008.
"Subsidizing Enjoyable Education,"
Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 1023-1039, October.
- Robert Dur & Amihai Glazer, 2005. "Subsidizing Enjoyable Education," CESifo Working Paper Series 1560, CESifo.
- Robert Dur & Amihai Glazer, 2005. "Subsidizing Enjoyable Education," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-010/1, Tinbergen Institute, revised 29 Aug 2007.
- Masoumeh Ahmadi Shirazi, 2019. "For a Greater Good: Bias Analysis in Writing Assessment," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:cshedu:qt81f4h1nn. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/cshe/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.