EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY: The Emergence of Selective Admission Policies in Dutch Higher Education - A Case Study on Amsterdam University College
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Geiser, Saul, 2008. "Back to the Basics: In Defense of Achievement (and Achievement Tests) in College Admissions," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt8kd4q096, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
- Chatman, Steve, 2008. "Does Diversity Matter in the Education Process? An Exploration of Student Interactions by Wealth, Religion, Politics, Race, Ethnicity and Immigrant Status at the University of California," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt4cv9z4wq, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
- Steven Brint, John Aubrey Douglass, Gregg Thomson, and Steve Chatman, 2010. "ENGAGED LEARNING IN A PUBLIC UNIVERSITY: Trends in the Undergraduate Experience. Report on the Results of the 2008 University of California Undergraduate Experience Survey," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt79s3173q, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Anja Deelen & Sonny Kuijpers, 2016. "The Effects of Additional Study Choice Activities: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial," CPB Discussion Paper 338.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Anja Deelen & Sonny Kuijpers, 2016. "The Effects of Additional Study Choice Activities: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial," CPB Discussion Paper 338, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Jake Anders, 2014. "Does an aptitude test affect socioeconomic and gender gaps in attendance at an elite university?," DoQSS Working Papers 14-07, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
- Geiser, Saul, 2008. "Not So Fast! A Second Opinion on a University of California Proposal to Endorse the New SAT," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt0x09n63m, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:cshedu:qt4502w5pj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/cshe/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.