IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug17/01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ridit splines with applications to propensity weighting

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Newson

    (Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London)

Abstract

Given a random variable X, the ridit function RX(·) specifies its distribution. The SSC package wridit can compute ridits (possibly weighted) for a variable. A ridit spline in a variable X is a spline in the ridit RX(X). The SSC package polyspline can be used with wridit to generate an unrestricted ridit-spline basis for an X-variable, with the feature that, in a regression model, the parameters corresponding to the basis variables are equal to mean values of the outcome variable at a list of percentiles of the X-variable. Ridit splines are especially useful in propensity weighting. The user may define a primary propensity score in the usual way, by fitting a regression model of the treatment variable with respect to the confounders, and then using the predicted values of the treatment variable. A secondary propensity score is then defined by regressing the treatment variable with respect to a ridit- spline basis in the primary propensity score. We have found that secondary propensity scores can predict the treatment variable as well as the corresponding primary propensity scores, as measured using the unweighted Somers' D with respect to the treatment variable. However, secondary propensity weights frequently perform better than primary propensity weights at standardizing out the treatment-propensity association, as measured using the propensity- weighted Somers' D with respect to the treatment variable. Also, when we measure the treatment effect, secondary propensity weights may cause considerably less variance inflation than primary propensity weights. This is because the secondary propensity score is less likely to produce extreme propensity weights than the primary propensity score.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Newson, 2017. "Ridit splines with applications to propensity weighting," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2017 01, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug17:01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/usug2017/newson-uksug17.pdf
    File Function: presentation materials
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://repec.org/usug2017/newson-uksug17-examples1.do
    File Function: sample do-file
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger B. Newson, 2012. "Sensible parameters for univariate and multivariate splines," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 12(3), pages 479-504, September.
    2. Roger Newson, 2016. "The role of Somers's D in propensity modeling," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2016 01, Stata Users Group.
    3. Roger Newson, 2014. "Easy-to-use packages for estimating rank and spline parameters," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2014 01, Stata Users Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roger Newson, 2021. "Ridits right, left, center, native and foreign," London Stata Conference 2021 1, Stata Users Group.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javier Alejo & Gabriel Montes-Rojas & Walter Sosa-Escudero, 2023. "RIF regression via sensitivity curves," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 329-345, March.
    2. Roger Newson, 2013. "Creating factor variables in resultssets and other datasets," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2013 01, Stata Users Group.
    3. Charalampos Agiropoulos & Michael L. Polemis & Michael Siopsis & Sotiris Karkalakos, 2022. "Revisiting the finance‐growth nexus: A socioeconomic approach," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 2762-2783, July.
    4. Polemis, Michael L. & Stengos, Thanasis & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "Revisiting the impact of financial depth on growth: A semi-parametric approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    5. Checherita-Westphal, Cristina & Žďárek, Václav, 2017. "Fiscal reaction function and fiscal fatigue: evidence for the euro area," Working Paper Series 2036, European Central Bank.
    6. Roger Newson, 2019. "Bland–Altman plots, rank parameters, and calibration ridit splines," London Stata Conference 2019 01, Stata Users Group.
    7. Minzhi Wu & Emili Tortosa-Ausina & Paula Cruz-García, 2024. "The impact of diversification on the profitability and risk of Chinese banks: evidence from a semiparametric approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(6), pages 2565-2606, December.
    8. Minzhi Wu & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2020. "Bank Diversification and Focus in Disruptive Times: China, 2007–2018," Working Papers 2020/21, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    9. Roger Newson, 2014. "Easy-to-use packages for estimating rank and spline parameters," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2014 01, Stata Users Group.
    10. Halkos, George & Polemis, Michael, 2018. "Does market structure trigger efficiency? Evidence for the USA before and after the financial crisis," MPRA Paper 84511, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Michael L. Polemis, 2018. "Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve: a semi-parametric analysis on the role of market structure on environmental pollution," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 27-35, March.
    12. Maarten L. Buis, 2017. "Not All Transitions Are Equal: The Relationship Between Effects on Passing Steps in a Sequential Process and Effects on the Final Outcome," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(3), pages 649-680, August.
    13. Roger Newson, 2021. "Ridits right, left, center, native and foreign," London Stata Conference 2021 1, Stata Users Group.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug17:01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.