IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bno/worpap/2015_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sigma point filters for dynamic nonlinear regime switching models

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Binning

    (Norges Bank (Central Bank of Norway))

  • Junior Maih

    (Norges Bank (Central Bank of Norway) and BI Norwegian Business School)

Abstract

In this paper we take three well known Sigma Point Filters, namely the Unscented Kalman Filter, the Divided Difference Filter, and the Cubature Kalman Filter, and extend them to allow for a very general class of dynamic nonlinear regime switching models. Using both a Monte Carlo study and real data, we investigate the properties of our proposed filters by using a regime switching DSGE model solved using nonlinear methods. We find that the proposed filters perform well. They are both fast and reasonably accurate, and as a result they will provide practitioners with a convenient alternative to Sequential Monte Carlo methods. We also investigate the concept of observability and its implications in the context of the nonlinear filters developed and propose some heuristics. Finally, we provide in the RISE toolbox, the codes implementing these three novel filters.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Binning & Junior Maih, 2015. "Sigma point filters for dynamic nonlinear regime switching models," Working Paper 2015/10, Norges Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:bno:worpap:2015_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.norges-bank.no/en/Published/Papers/Working-Papers/2015/102015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Binning & Junior Maih, 2016. "Forecast uncertainty in the neighborhood of the effective lower bound: How much asymmetry should we expect?," Working Paper 2016/13, Norges Bank.
    2. repec:bny:wpaper:0043 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Luisa Corrado & Stefano Grassi & Aldo Paolillo, 2021. "Modelling and Estimating Large Macroeconomic Shocks During the Pandemic," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 530, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    4. Boehl, Gregor & Strobel, Felix, 2024. "Estimation of DSGE models with the effective lower bound," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Benchimol, Jonathan & Ivashchenko, Sergey, 2021. "Switching volatility in a nonlinear open economy," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Christopher Otrok & Andrew Foerster & Alessandro Rebucci & Gianluca Benigno, 2017. "Estimating Macroeconomic Models of Financial Crises: An Endogenous Regime Switching Approach," 2017 Meeting Papers 572, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    7. Karamé, Frédéric, 2018. "A new particle filtering approach to estimate stochastic volatility models with Markov-switching," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 204-230.
    8. Nigar Hashimzade & Oleg Kirsanov & Tatiana Kirsanova & Junior Maih, 2024. "On Bayesian Filtering for Markov Regime Switching Models," Papers 2402.08051, arXiv.org.
    9. Luisa Corrado & Stefano Grassi & Aldo Paolillo, 2021. "Identifying Economic Shocks in a Rare Disaster Environment," CEIS Research Paper 517, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 18 Jul 2024.
    10. Sanha Noh, 2020. "Posterior Inference on Parameters in a Nonlinear DSGE Model via Gaussian-Based Filters," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 795-841, December.
    11. Andrew Foerster & Christian Matthes, 2022. "Learning About Regime Change," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1829-1859, November.
    12. Andrew Binning & Junior Maih, 2017. "Modelling Occasionally Binding Constraints Using Regime-Switching," Working Paper 2017/23, Norges Bank.
    13. repec:bny:wpaper:0058 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regime Switching; Higher-order Perturbation; Sigma Point Filters; Nonlinear DSGE estimation; Observability;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bno:worpap:2015_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nbgovno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.