IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bgu/wpaper/0714.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Early Round Of The Bullionist Debate 1800-1802: Boyd, Baring And Thornton’S Innovative Ideas

Author

Listed:
  • Arie Arnon

    (Dept. of Economics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)

Abstract

The Restriction period, which began in England in 1797, marked a crucial turning point for both monetary theory and policy. The debates during the Restriction concerning the complicated relationship between inflation, the exchanges and monetary aggregates came to be known as the Bullionist Debate. The Bullionists were critical of the Bank of England and supported a return to convertibility, whereas the anti-Bullionists defended the Bank and were satisfied with the inconvertible system. Throughout the period, discussions fluctuated in intensity, as Jacob Viner (1937) and Frank W. Fetter (1965) pointed out, with the market price of gold. When the price of gold in terms of inconvertible notes was high, as in 1800-01 and in 1809-10, and the exchanges were bad, the controversy intensified. The first round in the debate started with a Bullionist argument published by Walter Boyd (1801) to which Francis Baring (1801), the anti-Bullionist, reacted; their intense exchange provides an historic context for examining and re-evaluating Henry Thornton's seminal contribution to monetary theory. The paper will argue that Thornton’s path breaking Paper Credit (1802) presents an innovative and consistent anti-Bullionist position, one that differs from that of Baring who accepted the Smithian Real Bills Doctrine for both convertible and inconvertible situations. Thornton, on the other hand, rejected the Real Bills Doctrine and more generally Smith’s monetary thinking as it applied to both convertible and inconvertible monetary arrangements. The fundamental idea behind Thornton's defense of the Bank of England and inconvertibility was the crucial role of the Bank in managing the monetary system under both currency regimes. After 1802, particularly as a member of the famous Bullion Committee, Thornton played an 3 important role on the side of the Bullionists that resulted in his being described by later scholars as a "moderate Bullionist." However, as I intend to show, his reserved support for convertibility during this period reflects his disappointment with the Bank directors, whose poor management skills and fundamental misunderstanding of the monetary system threatened the stability of the British economy. For this reason, the shift in Thornton's position may be better understood as a political and pragmatic response to an untenable situation rather than as a reversal of his theory or a principled rejection of an inconvertible, properly managed, regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Arie Arnon, 2007. "The Early Round Of The Bullionist Debate 1800-1802: Boyd, Baring And Thornton’S Innovative Ideas," Working Papers 0714, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:bgu:wpaper:0714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://in.bgu.ac.il/en/humsos/Econ/Workingpapers/0714.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Laidler, 1981. "Adam Smith as a Monetary Economist," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 185-200, May.
    2. Arnon, Arie, 1987. "Banking between the Invisible and Visible Hands: A Reinterpretation of Ricardo's Place within the Classical School," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 268-281, June.
    3. Charles F. Peake, 1982. "Henry Thornton: an Accurate Perspective," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 115-120, Spring.
    4. David Laidler, 2004. "Macroeconomics in Retrospect," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3082.
    5. Herbert G. Grubel, 1961. "Ricardo and Thornton on the Transfer Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 75(2), pages 292-301.
    6. Hicks, J. R., 1979. "Critical Essays in Monetary Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198284239, Decembrie.
    7. Thomas M. Humphrey, 1989. "Lender of last resort: the concept in history," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 75(Mar), pages 8-16.
    8. Neil T. Skaggs, 1995. "Henry Thornton and the Development of Classical Monetary Economics," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 28(4b), pages 1212-1227, November.
    9. Skaggs, Neil T., 2003. "Thomas Tooke, Henry Thornton, and the Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 177-197, June.
    10. Reisman, David A, 1971. "Henry Thornton and Classical Monetary Economics," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 70-89, March.
    11. Perlman, Morris, 1986. "The Bullionist Controversy Revisited," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(4), pages 745-762, August.
    12. Robert L. Hetzel, 1987. "Henry Thornton: seminal monetary theorist and father of the modern central bank," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 73(Jul), pages 3-16.
    13. David Glasner, 1992. "The Real-Bills Doctrine in the Light of the Law of Reflux," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 867-894, Winter.
    14. Charles F. Peake, 1978. "Henry Thornton and the Development of Ricardo's Economic Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 193-212, Summer.
    15. Jacob H. Hollander, 1911. "The Development of the Theory of Money from Adam Smith to David Ricardo," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 25(3), pages 429-470.
    16. David LAIDLER, 2003. "Two Views Of The Lender Of Last Resort: Thornton And Bagehot," Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy, L'Harmattan, issue 45, pages 61-78.
    17. Cannan, Edwin, 1919. "The Paper Pound of 1797-1821," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number cannan1919.
    18. Antoin Murphy, 2005. "Rejoinder to Skaggs's Treating schizophrenia: a comment on Antoin Murphy's diagnosis of Henry Thornton's theoretical condition," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 329-332.
    19. Antoin Murphy, 2003. "Paper credit and the multi-personae Mr. Henry Thornton," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 429-453.
    20. David Laidler, 2000. "Highlights of the Bullionist Controversy," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20002, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    21. Peake, Charles F, 1995. "Henry Thornton in the History of Economics: Confusions and Contributions," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 63(3), pages 283-296, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert L. Hetzel, 2016. "The Rise and Fall of the Quantity Theory in Nineteenth Century Britain: Implications for Early Fed Thinking," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Q4, pages 281-320.
    2. Ghislain Deleplace, 2022. "“Storm in a Teacup? The Impact of War on the English Monetary System and Thought (1797-1821)”," Post-Print hal-04429477, HAL.
    3. Curott, Nicholas, 2016. "Adam Smith’s Theory of Money and Banking," Studies in Applied Economics 47, The Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4152 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Joshua R. Hendrickson, 2018. "The Bullionist Controversy: Theory and New Evidence," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 50(1), pages 203-241, February.
    6. Nissaf Ben Ayed & Gérard Mondello, 2015. "The Adam Smith's Banking System: The sources of the analysis of modern banking governance," Post-Print hal-01251667, HAL.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6554 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Nelson, Edward, 2013. "Friedman's monetary economics in practice," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 59-83.
    9. Michele Bee & Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi, 2024. "Agreement is money: Beyond the chartalist reading of Adam Smith," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 666, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    10. Antoin Murphy, 2003. "Paper credit and the multi-personae Mr. Henry Thornton," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 429-453.
    11. Mr. Marc C Dobler & Mr. Simon T Gray & Diarmuid Murphy & Bozena Radzewicz-Bak, 2016. "The Lender of Last Resort Function after the Global Financial Crisis," IMF Working Papers 2016/010, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Thomas M. Humphrey, 2003. "Classical deflation theory," Working Paper 03-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
    13. Mauro Boianovsky, 2004. "The IS-LM Model and the Liquidity Trap Concept: From Hicks to Krugman," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 92-126, Supplemen.
    14. Lars Jonung, 2002. "EMU and the Euro - The First Ten Years. Challenges to the sustainability and price stability of the euro area - what does history tell us?," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 46, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    15. Sylvie Diatkine, 1994. "A propos de la position de Ricardo concernant la liberté d'émission de la monnaie," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 23(1), pages 79-99.
    16. Costas Lapavitsas, 2002. "Banks And The Design Of The Financial System: Underpinnings In Steuart, Smith And Hilferding," Working Papers 128, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    17. David Laidler, 1991. "The Quantity Theory is Always and Everywhere Controversial—Why?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 67(4), pages 289-306, December.
    18. Charles van Marrewijk, 2004. "An introduction to international money and foreign exchange markets," International Finance 0410006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Coenen Günter & Orphanides Athanasios & Wieland Volker, 2004. "Price Stability and Monetary Policy Effectiveness when Nominal Interest Rates are Bounded at Zero," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Buiter, Willem, 2007. "Is Numérairology the Future of Monetary Economics? Unbundling Numéraire and Medium of Exchange Through a Virtual Currency and," CEPR Discussion Papers 6099, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    21. Antoine Martin, 2005. "Reconciling Bagehot with the Fed's response to September 11," Staff Reports 217, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    22. Robert W. Dimand, 2012. "The Roots of the Present are in the Past: The Relation of Postwar Developments in Macroeconomics to Interwar Business Cycle and Monetary Theory," Chapters, in: Thomas Cate (ed.), Keynes’s General Theory, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bgu:wpaper:0714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aamer Abu-Qarn (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edbguil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.