IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bgu/wpaper/0606.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Optimal Method Of Binary Information Transfer (Bit) Between Surveys Of An Identical Population

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Gottlieb

    (Bank of Israel and BGU)

  • Leonid Kushnir

    (Bank of Israe)

Abstract

This paper deals with the optimal transfer of information on group identification between different data sets of an identical population. Such a need might arise frequently in the analysis of socio-economic surveys and in the implementation of social and economic policy. Due to the limited number of questions asked in any given survey, analysts of one survey may need some binary information available in another survey of the same population. We suggest an efficient method for transferring such binary information between the survey in which the information is available (the "source-survey") and the survey in which the information is needed (the "target-survey"). We show that an optimal method for transferring the information depends crucially on two aspects of the process: (1) an efficiently estimated statistical model of of group-membership (the goodness of fit of the ROC-curve) and (2) the determination of the optimal cutoff value (the value chosen for turning the logistic probability forecast back into a binary variable). The proposed method can be useful in the social sciences, in medical research and in any field that requires probabilistic binary data enrichment between data sets drawn from a common population. It is an efficient method for ex-post enhancement of given data sets, when such enhancement by use of other methods is either expensive or impossible. In this paper we perform a BIT on membership in the Jewish Ultra-orthodox community in Israel, known as an extremely impoverished group. Since the information on religious group membership exists only in the "Social Survey" and information on poverty exists only in the Income Survey or the Expenditure Survey, there arises a need for optimal BIT. We present the results of such an optimization and its importance for social policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Gottlieb & Leonid Kushnir, 2006. "An Optimal Method Of Binary Information Transfer (Bit) Between Surveys Of An Identical Population," Working Papers 0606, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bgu:wpaper:0606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://in.bgu.ac.il/en/humsos/Econ/Workingpapers/0606.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eli Berman, 2000. "Sect, Subsidy, and Sacrifice: An Economist's View of Ultra-Orthodox Jews," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(3), pages 905-953.
    2. Daniel Gottlieb & Roy Manor, 2005. "ON THE CHOICE OF A POLICYORIENTED POVERTY MEASURE The Case of Israel: 1997-2002 (in Hebrew)," Working Papers 0507, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    3. Gottlieb, Daniel & Manor, Roy, 2005. "On the Choice of a Policy-oriented Poverty Measure: The Case of Israel 1997-2002," MPRA Paper 3842, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Karnit Flug & Nitsa Kasir (Kaliner, 2003. "Poverty And Employment, And The Gulf Between Them," Israel Economic Review, Bank of Israel, vol. 1(1), pages 55-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gottlieb, Daniel, 2007. "העוני וההתנהגות בשוק העבודה בחברה החרדית [Poverty and Labor Market Behavior in the Ultra-Orthodox Population in Israel]," MPRA Paper 4024, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2006.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gottlieb, Daniel & Kushnir, Leonid, 2009. "Social policy targeting and binary information transfer between surveys," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 3, pages 1-16.
    2. Daniel Gottlieb & Alexander Fruman, 2011. "A quality-index of poverty measures," Working Papers 239, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    3. Suleiman Abu-Bader & Daniel Gottlieb, 2009. "Poverty, education and employment in the Arab-Bedouin society: A comparative view," Working Papers 137, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    4. סלימאן אבו-בדר ודר' דניאל גוטליב, 2009. "עוני, חינוך ותעסוקה בחברה הערבית-בדואית: מבט השוואתי (באנגלית)," Working Papers 357, National Insurance Institute of Israel.
    5. Guy Navon & Dov Chernichovsky, 2012. "Private Expenditure on Healthcare, Income Distribution, and Poverty in Israel," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2012.13, Bank of Israel.
    6. Robert MacCulloch & Silvia Pezzini, 2010. "The Roles of Freedom, Growth, and Religion in the Taste for Revolution," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(2), pages 329-358, May.
    7. Gilat Levy & Ronnie Razin, 2009. "Religious Organizations," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 544, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    8. Goldfarb, Yael & Neuman, Shoshana, 2020. "Enhancing Employability by Responding to Work Motives: Lessons from a Field Experiment among Israeli Ultra-Religious Women," IZA Discussion Papers 12921, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Chaudhary, Latika & Rubin, Jared, 2011. "Reading, writing, and religion: Institutions and human capital formation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 17-33, March.
    10. Francesco Caselli & Wilbur John Coleman II, 2013. "On The Theory Of Ethnic Conflict," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11, pages 161-192, January.
    11. Ran Abramitzky, 2008. "The Limits of Equality: Insights from the Israeli Kibbutz," Discussion Papers 07-048, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    12. Francisco Costa & Angelo Marcantonio & Rudi Rocha, 2023. "Stop Suffering! Economic Downturns and Pentecostal Upsurge," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 215-250.
    13. Grigoriadis, Theocharis, 2017. "Religion, administration & public goods: Experimental evidence from Russia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 42-60.
    14. Garance Genicot, 2022. "Tolerance and Compromise in Social Networks," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(1), pages 94-120.
    15. Alberto Alesina & Eliana La Ferrara, 2003. "Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 2028, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
    16. Ruffle Bradley J. & Sosis Richard, 2007. "Does It Pay To Pray? Costly Ritual and Cooperation," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-37, March.
    17. Lecce, Giampaolo & Ogliari, Laura & Squicciarini, Mara P., 2021. "Birth and migration of scientists: Does religiosity matter? Evidence from 19th-century France," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 274-289.
    18. Cantoni, Davide & Yuchtman, Noam, 2013. "The political economy of educational content and development: Lessons from history," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 233-244.
    19. Makowsky, Michael, 2009. "Religious Extremism, Clubs, and Civil Liberties: A Model of Religious Populations," MPRA Paper 14358, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Bradley J. Ruffle & Richard H. Sosis, 2003. "Does It Pay To Pray? Evaluating the Economic Return to Religious Ritual," Experimental 0309002, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Poverty; Targeting; ROC curves; Binary Variables; Group Identification; Poverty research; Social Policy Planning;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bgu:wpaper:0606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aamer Abu-Qarn (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edbguil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.