IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2015_86.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determinants of satisfaction amongst occupiers of commercial property

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Claire Sanderson

Abstract

In order to maximise occupancy and rental income, landlords must attract and retain occupiers. Therefore landlords and property managers need to understand what aspects of property management matter most to occupiers. This paper uses structural equation modelling and regression to analyse 4400 interviews with retailers, office tenants and occupiers of industrial property, conducted over a 12-year period. Interval-scale ratings of satisfaction with many aspects of occupancy are used as explanatory variables. The dependent variables are satisfaction with property management, value for money, overall occupier satisfaction and landlord reputation.Key Findings:_For all three asset classes, the aspects with most impact on occupiers’ satisfaction with property management are found to be communication, understanding business needs and responsiveness to requests. For occupiers’ overall satisfaction, the key determinants vary between asset classes, with ‘Tangibles’, including the form and function of the building, its location and amenities, being of particular importance to occupiers of industrial units and offices. Satisfaction with property management, and the professionalism of the landlord and manager, have an impact on occupiers’ willingness to recommend their landlord, as does occupiers’ perception of the Corporate Social Responsibility of the landlord. The accuracy and timeliness of billing and documentation, and the cleanliness and maintenance of the property, strongly influence occupiers’ perception of receiving value for money for rent and service charge. The paper discusses the magnitude and significance of these effects, and the differences in importance of the explanatory variables for the three commercial asset classes._

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Claire Sanderson, 2015. "Determinants of satisfaction amongst occupiers of commercial property," ERES eres2015_86, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2015_86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2015-86
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/eres2015_86.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williamson, Oliver, 2009. "The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 111-134, December.
    2. Simon Cole, 2012. "The Impact of Reputation on Market Value," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 13(3), pages 47-68, July.
    3. Darby, Michael R & Karni, Edi, 1973. "Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 67-88, April.
    4. Vicky L. Seiler & James R. Webb & Thomas W. Whipple, 2000. "Assessment of Real Estate Brokerage Service Quality with a Practicing Professional's Instrument," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 20(1), pages 105-117.
    5. Simon Cole & Brian Sturgess & Michael Brown, 2013. "Using Reputation to Grow Corporate Value," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 14(3), pages 43-64, July.
    6. Susan Logan Nelson & Theron R. Nelson, 1995. "RESERV: An Instrument for Measuring Real Estate Brokerage Service Quality," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 10(1), pages 99-114.
    7. Mohd Nazali Moh Noor & Michael Pitt, 2010. "Compliance Of Rics Code Of Practice For Commercial Service Charges," ERES eres2010_001, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    8. Deborah S. Levy & Christina K.C. Lee, 2009. "Switching behaviour in property related professional services," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 87-103, March.
    9. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2010-001 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danielle C. Sanderson, 2014. "Treating the Tenant as a Customer: can good service improve real estate performance?," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2014-04, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    2. Danielle C. Sanderson & Victoria M. Edwards, 2014. "What Tenants Want: UK occupiers' requirements when renting commercial property and strategic implications for landlords," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2014-03, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    3. Vicky L. Seiler & Michael J. Seiler & James R. Webb, 2006. "Impact of Homebuyer Characteristics on Service Quality in Real Estate Brokerage," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 44-61.
    4. Ghozzi, Houda & Platoni, Silvia & Tillie, Pascal & Soregaroli, Claudio, 2018. "TCE determinants and governance forms in the EU “Non-GMO” soybean supply chain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 68-80.
    5. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    6. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.
    8. J. K. Pappalardo, 2022. "Economics of Consumer Protection: Contributions and Challenges in Estimating Consumer Injury and Evaluating Consumer Protection Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 201-238, June.
    9. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2015. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," ifh Working Papers 1 (2015), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    10. Dhaval M. Dave, 2013. "Effects of Pharmaceutical Promotion: A Review and Assessment," NBER Working Papers 18830, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2021. "On the optimality of outsourcing when vertical integration can mitigate information asymmetries," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. David M. Waguespack & Robert Salomon, 2016. "Quality, Subjectivity, and Sustained Superior Performance at the Olympic Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 286-300, January.
    13. Gu, Yiquan & Rasch, Alexander & Wenzel, Tobias, 2022. "Consumer salience and quality provision in (un)regulated public service markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    14. Eunae Jung & Hyungun Sung, 2017. "The Influence of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak on Online and Offline Markets for Retail Sales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Ahlin, Christian & Kim, In Kyung & Kim, Kyoo il, 2021. "Who commits fraud? evidence from korean gas stations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Pim Heijnen, 2013. "Informative advertising by an environmental group," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 249-272, April.
    17. Cai, Dapeng & Jørgensen, Jan Guldager, 2017. "Mutual Recognition for Sale: International Bargaining over Product Standards," Discussion Papers on Economics 1/2017, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    18. Erwan Quéinnec, 2012. "Les organisations sans but lucratif repondent- elles à une demande de biens de confiance ? Le cas des services de prise en charge," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 122(1), pages 67-87.
    19. Jianhua Wang & Jiaye Ge & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Urban Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pork with Certified Labels: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Jhunjhunwala, Tanushree, 2021. "Searching to avoid regret: An experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 298-319.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2015_86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.