IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2501.03269.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating the resilience of ESG investments in European Markets during turmoil periods

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Iannone
  • Pierdomenico Duttilo
  • Stefano Antonio Gattone

Abstract

This study investigates the resilience of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investments during periods of financial instability, comparing them with traditional equity indices across major European markets-Germany, France, and Italy. Using daily returns from October 2021 to February 2024, the analysis explores the effects of key global disruptions such as the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict on market performance. A mixture of two generalised normal distributions (MGND) and EGARCH-in-mean models are used to identify periods of market turmoil and assess volatility dynamics. The findings indicate that during crises, ESG investments present higher volatility in Germany and Italy than in France. Despite some regional variations, ESG portfolios demonstrate greater resilience compared to traditional ones, offering potential risk mitigation during market shocks. These results underscore the importance of integrating ESG factors into long-term investment strategies, particularly in the face of unpredictable financial turmoil.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Iannone & Pierdomenico Duttilo & Stefano Antonio Gattone, 2025. "Evaluating the resilience of ESG investments in European Markets during turmoil periods," Papers 2501.03269, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.03269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.03269
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed Arouri & Guillaume Pijourlet, 2017. "CSR Performance and the Value of Cash Holdings: International Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 263-284, January.
    2. Simon Cole & Mike Brown & Brian Sturgess, 2014. "Applying Reputation Data to Enhance Investment Performance," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 15(4), pages 59-72, October.
    3. Ghani, Usman & Zhu, Bo & Qin, Quande & Ghani, Maria, 2024. "Forecasting US Stock Market Volatility: Evidence from ESG and CPU indices," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Price, Joseph M. & Sun, Wenbin, 2017. "Doing good and doing bad: The impact of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 82-97.
    5. Joseph K. W. Fung & F. Y. Eric Lam & Yiuman Tse, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Rating on Hedging Downside Risks: Evidence from a Weight-Tilted Hang Seng Index," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Hemendra Gupta & Rashmi Chaudhary, 2023. "An Analysis of Volatility and Risk-Adjusted Returns of ESG Indices in Developed and Emerging Economies," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. María Garrido‐Ruso & Luis Otero‐González & María‐Celia López‐Penabad & Pablo Durán Santomil, 2024. "Does ESG implementation influence performance and risk in SMEs?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4227-4247, September.
    8. Bauer, Rob & Smeets, Paul, 2015. "Social identification and investment decisions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 121-134.
    9. Ioannis Katsampoxakis & Stylianos Xanthopoulos & Charalampos Basdekis & Apostolos G. Christopoulos, 2024. "Can ESG Stocks Be a Safe Haven during Global Crises? Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine War with Time-Frequency Wavelet Analysis," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Tomasz L. Nawrocki & Danuta Szwajca, 2022. "The Importance of Selected Aspects of a Company’s Reputation for Individual Stock Market Investors—Evidence from Polish Capital Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Lin, Xiang & Bali Swain, Ranjula, 2024. "Performance of negatively screened sustainable investments during crisis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1226-1247.
    12. Pierdomenico Duttilo & Stefano Antonio Gattone & Tonio Di Battista, 2021. "Volatility Modeling: An Overview of Equity Markets in the Euro Area during COVID-19 Pandemic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Mohammed Benlemlih & Mohammad Bitar, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 647-671, March.
    14. Shafique Ur Rehman & Stefano Bresciani & Dorra Yahiaoui & Elisa Giacosa, 2022. "Environmental sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility influence on environmental performance of small and medium enterprises: The mediating effect of green capability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1954-1967, November.
    15. Paul C. Godfrey & Craig B. Merrill & Jared M. Hansen, 2009. "The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 425-445, April.
    16. Elizabeth Demers & Jurian Hendrikse & Philip Joos & Baruch Lev, 2021. "ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 433-462, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierdomenico Duttilo & Stefano Antonio Gattone & Barbara Iannone, 2024. "Mixtures of generalized normal distributions and EGARCH models to analyse returns and volatility of ESG and traditional investments," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 108(4), pages 755-775, December.
    2. Costanza Torricelli & Beatrice Bertelli, 2022. "ESG screening strategies and portfolio performance: how do they fare in periods of financial distress?," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0087, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    3. Ramzi Benkraiem & Maria Qureshi & Asif Saeed & Constantin Zopounidis, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility, carbon footprints and stock market valuation," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 213-237, August.
    4. Giovanni Cardillo & Ennio Bendinelli & Giuseppe Torluccio, 2023. "COVID‐19, ESG investing, and the resilience of more sustainable stocks: Evidence from European firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 602-623, January.
    5. Anita Mendiratta & Shveta Singh & Surendra Singh Yadav & Arvind Mahajan, 2023. "Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 319-339, September.
    6. Xu, Nana & Chen, Jiaqi & Zhou, Fangzhao & Dong, Qing & He, Zhifang, 2023. "Corporate ESG and resilience of stock prices in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Vishnu K. Ramesh & A. Athira, 2023. "Real effects of social trust on firm performance during COVID‐19," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 671-693, January.
    8. Van Ha Nguyen & Frank W Agbola & Bobae Choi, 2019. "Does corporate social responsibility reduce information asymmetry? Empirical evidence from Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(2), pages 188-211, May.
    9. Cemil Kuzey & Habiba Al-Shaer & Ali Uyar & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2024. "Do board monitoring and audit committee quality help risky firms reduce CSR controversies?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1007-1045, October.
    10. Svetlana Orlova & Li Sun, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and unverifiable net assets ratio," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 31-48, March.
    11. Alves, Carlos Francisco & Meneses, Lilian Lima, 2024. "ESG scores and debt costs: Exploring indebtedness, agency costs, and financial system impact," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Ehsan Poursoleyman & Gholamreza Mansourfar & Mohammad Kabir Hassan & Saeid Homayoun, 2024. "Did Corporate Social Responsibility Vaccinate Corporations Against COVID-19?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 525-551, January.
    13. Yang, Dan & Zhao, Zhiyong & Wang, Liangliang, 2024. "Is ESG reporting informative to debtholders?— Evidence from a quasi-experiment in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    14. Monfort, Abel & Villagra, Nuria & Sánchez, Joaquín, 2021. "Economic impact of corporate foundations: An event analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 159-170.
    15. Gomes, Mathieu & Marsat, Sylvain, 2018. "Does CSR impact premiums in M&A transactions?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 71-80.
    16. Akhilesh Bajaj & Lori N. K. Leonard & Li Sun & Zhenze Xing, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and annual report reading difficulty," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1393-1428, May.
    17. Maretno A. Harjoto & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Marcus A. Nilsson, 2022. "Bondholders’ returns and stakeholders’ interests," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1271-1301, November.
    18. Florian Habermann & Felix Bernhard Fischer, 2023. "Corporate Social Performance and the Likelihood of Bankruptcy: Evidence from a Period of Economic Upswing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 243-259, January.
    19. Mohamad Hassan Shahrour & Isabelle Girerd-Potin & Ollivier Taramasco, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and firm default risk in the Eurozone: a market-based approach," Post-Print hal-03198467, HAL.
    20. Anh Dang & Trung Nguyen, 2021. "Valuation Effect of Emotionality in Corporate Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 47-67, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2501.03269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.