IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2411.09644.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Neural Operators Can Play Dynamic Stackelberg Games

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Alvarez
  • Ibrahim Ekren
  • Anastasis Kratsios
  • Xuwei Yang

Abstract

Dynamic Stackelberg games are a broad class of two-player games in which the leader acts first, and the follower chooses a response strategy to the leader's strategy. Unfortunately, only stylized Stackelberg games are explicitly solvable since the follower's best-response operator (as a function of the control of the leader) is typically analytically intractable. This paper addresses this issue by showing that the \textit{follower's best-response operator} can be approximately implemented by an \textit{attention-based neural operator}, uniformly on compact subsets of adapted open-loop controls for the leader. We further show that the value of the Stackelberg game where the follower uses the approximate best-response operator approximates the value of the original Stackelberg game. Our main result is obtained using our universal approximation theorem for attention-based neural operators between spaces of square-integrable adapted stochastic processes, as well as stability results for a general class of Stackelberg games.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Alvarez & Ibrahim Ekren & Anastasis Kratsios & Xuwei Yang, 2024. "Neural Operators Can Play Dynamic Stackelberg Games," Papers 2411.09644, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.09644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.09644
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cao, Jingyi & Li, Dongchen & Young, Virginia R. & Zou, Bin, 2022. "Stackelberg differential game for insurance under model ambiguity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 128-145.
    2. Ghossoub, Mario & Zhu, Michael B., 2024. "Stackelberg equilibria with multiple policyholders," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 189-201.
    3. Ludwig Dierks & Sven Seuken, 2022. "Cloud Pricing: The Spot Market Strikes Back," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 105-122, January.
    4. Emma Hubert & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamai & Xavier Warin, 2020. "Incentives, lockdown, and testing: from Thucydides's analysis to the COVID-19 pandemic," Papers 2009.00484, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    5. René Carmona & Gökçe Dayanıklı, 2021. "Mean Field Game Model for an Advertising Competition in a Duopoly," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Romuald Elie & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamaï, 2019. "A Tale of a Principal and Many, Many Agents," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 440-467, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Krv{s}ek & Dylan Possamai, 2023. "Randomisation with moral hazard: a path to existence of optimal contracts," Papers 2311.13278, arXiv.org.
    2. Ghossoub, Mario & Zhu, Michael B., 2024. "Stackelberg equilibria with multiple policyholders," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 189-201.
    3. Arvind V. Shrivats & Dena Firoozi & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2022. "A mean‐field game approach to equilibrium pricing in solar renewable energy certificate markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 779-824, July.
    4. Marcel Nutz & Yuchong Zhang, 2021. "Mean Field Contest with Singularity," Papers 2103.04219, arXiv.org.
    5. Steven Campbell & Yichao Chen & Arvind Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2021. "Deep Learning for Principal-Agent Mean Field Games," Papers 2110.01127, arXiv.org.
    6. Mario Ghossoub & Michael B. Zhu & Wing Fung Chong, 2024. "Pareto-Optimal Peer-to-Peer Risk Sharing with Robust Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2409.05103, arXiv.org.
    7. Guillermo Alonso Alvarez & Erhan Bayraktar & Ibrahim Ekren & Liwei Huang, 2024. "Sequential optimal contracting in continuous time," Papers 2411.04262, arXiv.org.
    8. Bastien Baldacci & Philippe Bergault, 2021. "Optimal incentives in a limit order book: a SPDE control approach," Papers 2112.00375, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    9. Dena Firoozi & Arvind V Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2021. "Principal agent mean field games in REC markets," Papers 2112.11963, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    10. Cao, Jingyi & Li, Dongchen & Young, Virginia R. & Zou, Bin, 2023. "Reinsurance games with two reinsurers: Tree versus chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 928-941.
    11. René Carmona & Gökçe Dayanıklı & Mathieu Laurière, 2022. "Mean Field Models to Regulate Carbon Emissions in Electricity Production," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 897-928, September.
    12. René Carmona, 2022. "The influence of economic research on financial mathematics: Evidence from the last 25 years," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 85-101, January.
    13. Camilo Hern'andez & Dylan Possamai, 2023. "Time-inconsistent contract theory," Papers 2303.01601, arXiv.org.
    14. Zhu, Michael B. & Ghossoub, Mario & Boonen, Tim J., 2023. "Equilibria and efficiency in a reinsurance market," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 24-49.
    15. Alexander Aurell & René Carmona & Gökçe Dayanıklı & Mathieu Laurière, 2022. "Finite State Graphon Games with Applications to Epidemics," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 49-81, March.
    16. Rene Carmona, 2020. "Applications of Mean Field Games in Financial Engineering and Economic Theory," Papers 2012.05237, arXiv.org.
    17. René Carmona & Peiqi Wang, 2021. "A Probabilistic Approach to Extended Finite State Mean Field Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 471-502, May.
    18. Mao Fabrice Djete, 2024. "Three connected problems: principal with multiple agents in cooperation, Principal--Agent with Mckean--Vlasov dynamics and multitask Principal--Agent," Papers 2410.15818, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    19. David Landriault & Bin Li & Hong Li & Yuanyuan Zhang, 2024. "Contract Structure and Risk Aversion in Longevity Risk Transfers," Papers 2409.08914, arXiv.org.
    20. Ashish R. Hota & Urmee Maitra & Ezzat Elokda & Saverio Bolognani, 2023. "Learning to Mitigate Epidemic Risks: A Dynamic Population Game Approach," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1106-1129, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2411.09644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.