IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2403.15243.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Robust Utility Optimization via a GAN Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Krach
  • Josef Teichmann
  • Hanna Wutte

Abstract

Robust utility optimization enables an investor to deal with market uncertainty in a structured way, with the goal of maximizing the worst-case outcome. In this work, we propose a generative adversarial network (GAN) approach to (approximately) solve robust utility optimization problems in general and realistic settings. In particular, we model both the investor and the market by neural networks (NN) and train them in a mini-max zero-sum game. This approach is applicable for any continuous utility function and in realistic market settings with trading costs, where only observable information of the market can be used. A large empirical study shows the versatile usability of our method. Whenever an optimal reference strategy is available, our method performs on par with it and in the (many) settings without known optimal strategy, our method outperforms all other reference strategies. Moreover, we can conclude from our study that the trained path-dependent strategies do not outperform Markovian ones. Lastly, we uncover that our generative approach for learning optimal, (non-) robust investments under trading costs generates universally applicable alternatives to well known asymptotic strategies of idealized settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Krach & Josef Teichmann & Hanna Wutte, 2024. "Robust Utility Optimization via a GAN Approach," Papers 2403.15243, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2403.15243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.15243
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Atkinson & Emmeline Storey, 2010. "Building an Optimal Portfolio in Discrete Time in the Presence of Transaction Costs," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 323-357.
    2. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Max Reppen & H. Mete Soner, 2016. "A Primer on Portfolio Choice with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1612.01302, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    3. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    4. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Tao Chen & Igor Cialenco & Areski Cousin & Monique Jeanblanc, 2017. "Adaptive Robust Control Under Model Uncertainty," Papers 1706.02227, arXiv.org.
    5. Richard J. Martin, 2012. "Optimal multifactor trading under proportional transaction costs," Papers 1204.6488, arXiv.org.
    6. Joachim de Lataillade & Cyril Deremble & Marc Potters & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2012. "Optimal Trading with Linear Costs," Papers 1203.5957, arXiv.org.
    7. M. H. A. Davis & A. R. Norman, 1990. "Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 676-713, November.
    8. Christoph Belak & Lukas Mich & Frank T. Seifried, 2022. "Optimal investment for retail investors," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 555-594, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Igor Cialenco & Gabriela Kov'av{c}ov'a, 2024. "Vector-valued robust stochastic control," Papers 2407.00266, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Kallsen & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2013. "The General Structure of Optimal Investment and Consumption with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1303.3148, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    2. Joachim de Lataillade & Ayman Chaouki, 2020. "Equations and Shape of the Optimal Band Strategy," Papers 2003.04646, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    3. Xinfu Chen & Min Dai & Wei Jiang & Cong Qin, 2022. "Asymptotic analysis of long‐term investment with two illiquid and correlated assets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1133-1169, October.
    4. Filippo Passerini & Samuel E. Vazquez, 2015. "Optimal Trading with Alpha Predictors," Papers 1501.03756, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    5. Albert Altarovici & Max Reppen & H. Mete Soner, 2016. "Optimal Consumption and Investment with Fixed and Proportional Transaction Costs," Papers 1610.03958, arXiv.org.
    6. Ren Liu & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Marko H. Weber, 2014. "Rebalancing with Linear and Quadratic Costs," Papers 1402.5306, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2017.
    7. Ayman Chaouki & Stephen Hardiman & Christian Schmidt & Emmanuel S'eri'e & Joachim de Lataillade, 2020. "Deep Deterministic Portfolio Optimization," Papers 2003.06497, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    8. Florent Gallien & Serge Kassibrakis & Semyon Malamud, 2018. "Hedge or Rebalance: Optimal Risk Management with Transaction Costs," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Richard J Martin, 2016. "Universal trading under proportional transaction costs," Papers 1603.06558, arXiv.org.
    10. Wang, Ning & Siu, Tak Kuen, 2024. "Investment–consumption optimization with transaction cost and learning about return predictability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 877-891.
    11. Peter Bank & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2018. "Optimal investment with transient price impact," Papers 1804.07392, arXiv.org.
    12. Dokuchaev, Nikolai, 2010. "Optimality of myopic strategies for multi-stock discrete time market with management costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 551-556, January.
    13. Bjork, Tomas, 2009. "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199574742.
    14. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Michel Kschonnek & Rudi Zagst, 2022. "Portfolio optimization: not necessarily concave utility and constraints on wealth and allocation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(1), pages 101-140, February.
    15. Min Dai & Zuo Quan Xu & Xun Yu Zhou, 2009. "Continuous-Time Markowitz's Model with Transaction Costs," Papers 0906.0678, arXiv.org.
    16. Villena, Marcelo J. & Reus, Lorenzo, 2016. "On the strategic behavior of large investors: A mean-variance portfolio approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 679-688.
    17. Jean-Pierre Fouque & Ruimeng Hu & Ronnie Sircar, 2021. "Sub- and Super-solution Approach to Accuracy Analysis of Portfolio Optimization Asymptotics in Multiscale Stochastic Factor Market," Papers 2106.11510, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    18. Ali Al-Aradi & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2018. "Outperformance and Tracking: Dynamic Asset Allocation for Active and Passive Portfolio Management," Papers 1803.05819, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2018.
    19. Baojun Bian & Xinfu Chen & Min Dai & Shuaijie Qian, 2021. "Penalty method for portfolio selection with capital gains tax," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1013-1055, July.
    20. Alain Bensoussan & Guiyuan Ma & Chi Chung Siu & Sheung Chi Phillip Yam, 2022. "Dynamic mean–variance problem with frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 267-300, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2403.15243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.