IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2306.09806.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing for Peer Effects without Specifying the Network Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Hyunseok Jung
  • Xiaodong Liu

Abstract

This paper proposes an Anderson-Rubin (AR) test for the presence of peer effects in panel data without the need to specify the network structure. The unrestricted model of our test is a linear panel data model of social interactions with dyad-specific peer effect coefficients for all potential peers. The proposed AR test evaluates if these peer effect coefficients are all zero. As the number of peer effect coefficients increases with the sample size, so does the number of instrumental variables (IVs) employed to test the restrictions under the null, rendering Bekker's many-IV environment. By extending existing many-IV asymptotic results to panel data, we establish the asymptotic validity of the proposed AR test. Our Monte Carlo simulations show the robustness and superior performance of the proposed test compared to some existing tests with misspecified networks. We provide two applications to demonstrate its empirical relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyunseok Jung & Xiaodong Liu, 2023. "Testing for Peer Effects without Specifying the Network Structure," Papers 2306.09806, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2306.09806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.09806
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Hashem Pesaran & Aman Ullah & Takashi Yamagata, 2008. "A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 11(1), pages 105-127, March.
    2. Liu, Xiaodong & Prucha, Ingmar R., 2018. "A robust test for network generated dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 92-113.
    3. Anatolyev, Stanislav & Sølvsten, Mikkel, 2023. "Testing many restrictions under heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 236(1).
    4. Sarafidis, Vasilis & Yamagata, Takashi & Robertson, Donald, 2009. "A test of cross section dependence for a linear dynamic panel model with regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 149-161, February.
    5. Chao, John C. & Hausman, Jerry A. & Newey, Whitney K. & Swanson, Norman R. & Woutersen, Tiemen, 2014. "Testing overidentifying restrictions with many instruments and heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 15-21.
    6. Anatolyev, Stanislav & Gospodinov, Nikolay, 2011. "Specification Testing In Models With Many Instruments," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 427-441, April.
    7. Baltagi, Badi H. & Feng, Qu & Kao, Chihwa, 2012. "A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 164-177.
    8. Hansen, Christian & Hausman, Jerry & Newey, Whitney, 2008. "Estimation With Many Instrumental Variables," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 398-422.
    9. Bekker, Paul A, 1994. "Alternative Approximations to the Distributions of Instrumental Variable Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 657-681, May.
    10. Lee, Lung-fei, 2007. "Identification and estimation of econometric models with group interactions, contextual factors and fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 333-374, October.
    11. Chao, John C. & Swanson, Norman R. & Hausman, Jerry A. & Newey, Whitney K. & Woutersen, Tiemen, 2012. "Asymptotic Distribution Of Jive In A Heteroskedastic Iv Regression With Many Instruments," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 42-86, February.
    12. Anatolyev, Stanislav & Yaskov, Pavel, 2017. "Asymptotics Of Diagonal Elements Of Projection Matrices Under Many Instruments/Regressors," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 717-738, June.
    13. Donald, Stephen G. & Imbens, Guido W. & Newey, Whitney K., 2003. "Empirical likelihood estimation and consistent tests with conditional moment restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 55-93, November.
    14. Chen, Jia & Gao, Jiti & Li, Degui, 2012. "A New Diagnostic Test For Cross-Section Uncorrelatedness In Nonparametric Panel Data Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(5), pages 1144-1163, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marine Carrasco & Mohamed Doukali, 2022. "Testing overidentifying restrictions with many instruments and heteroscedasticity using regularised jackknife IV," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(1), pages 71-97.
    2. Johannes W. Ligtenberg, 2023. "Inference in IV models with clustered dependence, many instruments and weak identification," Papers 2306.08559, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    3. Wang, Wenjie & Kaffo, Maximilien, 2016. "Bootstrap inference for instrumental variable models with many weak instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 231-268.
    4. Tom Boot & Johannes W. Ligtenberg, 2023. "Identification- and many instrument-robust inference via invariant moment conditions," Papers 2303.07822, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    5. Zhenhong Huang & Chen Wang & Jianfeng Yao, 2023. "The First-stage F Test with Many Weak Instruments," Papers 2302.14423, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    6. Kolesár, Michal, 2018. "Minimum distance approach to inference with many instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 86-100.
    7. Matsushita, Yukitoshi & Otsu, Taisuke, 2024. "A jackknife Lagrange multiplier test with many weak instruments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116392, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Baltagi, Badi H. & Feng, Qu & Kao, Chihwa, 2016. "Estimation of heterogeneous panels with structural breaks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 176-195.
    9. Crudu, Federico & Mellace, Giovanni & Sándor, Zsolt, 2021. "Inference In Instrumental Variable Models With Heteroskedasticity And Many Instruments," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(2), pages 281-310, April.
    10. Michal Kolesár & Raj Chetty & John Friedman & Edward Glaeser & Guido W. Imbens, 2015. "Identification and Inference With Many Invalid Instruments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 474-484, October.
    11. Chao, John C. & Hausman, Jerry A. & Newey, Whitney K. & Swanson, Norman R. & Woutersen, Tiemen, 2014. "Testing overidentifying restrictions with many instruments and heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 15-21.
    12. Eric Gautier & Christiern Rose, 2022. "Fast, Robust Inference for Linear Instrumental Variables Models using Self-Normalized Moments," Papers 2211.02249, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    13. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2021. "General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 13-50, January.
    14. Patrick Kline & Raffaele Saggio & Mikkel Sølvsten, 2020. "Leave‐Out Estimation of Variance Components," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(5), pages 1859-1898, September.
    15. Stanislav Anatolyev, 2013. "Instrumental variables estimation and inference in the presence of many exogenous regressors," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 16(1), pages 27-72, February.
    16. Dennis Lim & Wenjie Wang & Yichong Zhang, 2022. "A Conditional Linear Combination Test with Many Weak Instruments," Papers 2207.11137, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    17. Zhenhong Huang & Chen Wang & Jianfeng Yao, 2023. "A specification test for the strength of instrumental variables," Papers 2302.14396, arXiv.org.
    18. Anna Mikusheva & Liyang Sun, 2024. "Weak identification with many instruments," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 27(2), pages -28.
    19. Wang, Wenjie, 2020. "On Bootstrap Validity for the Test of Overidentifying Restrictions with Many Instruments and Heteroskedasticity," MPRA Paper 104858, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Chao, John C. & Swanson, Norman R. & Woutersen, Tiemen, 2023. "Jackknife estimation of a cluster-sample IV regression model with many weak instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1747-1769.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2306.09806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.