IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2206.10877.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gaining Insights on U.S. Senate Speeches Using a Time Varying Text Based Ideal Point Model

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Hofmarcher
  • Sourav Adhikari
  • Bettina Grun

Abstract

Estimating political positions of lawmakers has a long tradition in political science. We present the time varying text based ideal point model to study the political positions of lawmakers based on text data. In addition to identifying political positions, our model also provides insights into topical contents and their change over time. We use our model to analyze speeches given in the U.S. Senate between 1981 and 2017 and demonstrate how the results allow to conclude that partisanship between Republicans and Democrats increased in recent years. Further we investigate the political positions of speakers over time as well as at a specific point in time to identify speakers which are positioned at the extremes of their political party based on their speeches. The topics extracted are inspected to assess how their term compositions differ in dependence of the political position as well as how these term compositions change over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Hofmarcher & Sourav Adhikari & Bettina Grun, 2022. "Gaining Insights on U.S. Senate Speeches Using a Time Varying Text Based Ideal Point Model," Papers 2206.10877, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2206.10877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.10877
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David M. Blei & Alp Kucukelbir & Jon D. McAuliffe, 2017. "Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 859-877, April.
    2. Michael A. Bailey & Brian Kamoie & Forrest Maltzman, 2005. "Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(1), pages 72-85, January.
    3. Daniel D. Lee & H. Sebastian Seung, 1999. "Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6755), pages 788-791, October.
    4. Laver, Michael & Benoit, Kenneth & Garry, John, 2003. "Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(2), pages 311-331, May.
    5. Matthew Gentzkow & Jesse M. Shapiro & Matt Taddy, 2019. "Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1307-1340, July.
    6. Adam Boche & Jeffrey B. Lewis & Aaron Rudkin & Luke Sonnet, 2018. "The new Voteview.com: preserving and continuing Keith Poole’s infrastructure for scholars, students and observers of Congress," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 17-32, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Jouvin & Pierre Latouche & Charles Bouveyron & Guillaume Bataillon & Alain Livartowski, 2021. "Greedy clustering of count data through a mixture of multinomial PCA," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-33, March.
    2. Nathan J. Canen & Chad Kendall & Francesco Trebbi, 2020. "Political Parties as Drivers of U.S. Polarization: 1927-2018," NBER Working Papers 28296, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Caroline Le Pennec, 2024. "Strategic Campaign Communication: Evidence from 30,000 Candidate Manifestos," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(658), pages 785-810.
    4. van Loon, Austin, 2022. "Three Families of Automated Text Analysis," SocArXiv htnej, Center for Open Science.
    5. Edoardo Cefalà, 2022. "The political consequences of mass repatriation," Discussion Papers 2022-05, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    6. Rafael Teixeira & Mário Antunes & Diogo Gomes & Rui L. Aguiar, 2024. "Comparison of Semantic Similarity Models on Constrained Scenarios," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1307-1330, August.
    7. Del Corso, Gianna M. & Romani, Francesco, 2019. "Adaptive nonnegative matrix factorization and measure comparisons for recommender systems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 164-179.
    8. P Fogel & C Geissler & P Cotte & G Luta, 2022. "Applying separative non-negative matrix factorization to extra-financial data," Working Papers hal-03689774, HAL.
    9. Julia Cagé & Caroline Le Pennec & Elisa Mougin, 2021. "Corporate Donations and Political Rhetoric: Evidence from a National Ban," Working Papers hal-03877943, HAL.
    10. Xiao-Bai Li & Jialun Qin, 2017. "Anonymizing and Sharing Medical Text Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 332-352, June.
    11. Armèn Hakhverdian, 2009. "Capturing Government Policy on the Left–Right Scale: Evidence from the United Kingdom, 1956–2006," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(4), pages 720-745, December.
    12. Francesca Maria Calamunci & Federico Fabio Frattini, 2023. "When Crime Tears Communities Apart: Social Capital and Organised Crime," Working Papers 2023.08, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    13. Simon Hug & Tobias Schulz, 2007. "Referendums in the EU’s constitution building process," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 177-218, June.
    14. Pongsak Luangaram & Yuthana Sethapramote, 2016. "Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy Effectiveness: Evidence from Thailand," PIER Discussion Papers 20, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    15. Rybinski, Krzysztof, 2020. "The forecasting power of the multi-language narrative of sell-side research: A machine learning evaluation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    16. Shen Liu & Hongyan Liu, 2021. "Tagging Items Automatically Based on Both Content Information and Browsing Behaviors," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 882-897, July.
    17. Naiyang Guan & Lei Wei & Zhigang Luo & Dacheng Tao, 2013. "Limited-Memory Fast Gradient Descent Method for Graph Regularized Nonnegative Matrix Factorization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-10, October.
    18. Spelta, A. & Pecora, N. & Rovira Kaltwasser, P., 2019. "Identifying Systemically Important Banks: A temporal approach for macroprudential policies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 197-218.
    19. M. Moghadam & K. Aminian & M. Asghari & M. Parnianpour, 2013. "How well do the muscular synergies extracted via non-negative matrix factorisation explain the variation of torque at shoulder joint?," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 291-301.
    20. Markovsky, Ivan & Niranjan, Mahesan, 2010. "Approximate low-rank factorization with structured factors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3411-3420, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2206.10877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.