IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2202.09939.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Schr\"{o}dinger Risk Diversification Portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • Yusuke Uchiyama
  • Kei Nakagawa

Abstract

The mean-variance portfolio that considers the trade-off between expected return and risk has been widely used in the problem of asset allocation for multi-asset portfolios. However, since it is difficult to estimate the expected return and the out-of-sample performance of the mean-variance portfolio is poor, risk-based portfolio construction methods focusing only on risk have been proposed, and are attracting attention mainly in practice. In terms of risk, asset fluctuations that make up the portfolio are thought to have common factors behind them, and principal component analysis, which is a dimension reduction method, is applied to extract the factors. In this study, we propose the Schr\"{o}dinger risk diversification portfolio as a factor risk diversifying portfolio using Schr\"{o}dinger principal component analysis that applies the Schr\"{o}dinger equation in quantum mechanics. The Schr\"{o}dinger principal component analysis can accurately estimate the factors even if the sample points are unequally spaced or in a small number, thus we can make efficient risk diversification. The proposed method was verified to outperform the conventional risk parity and other risk diversification portfolio constructions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yusuke Uchiyama & Kei Nakagawa, 2022. "Schr\"{o}dinger Risk Diversification Portfolio," Papers 2202.09939, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2202.09939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.09939
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal, 2009. "Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1-N Portfolio Strategy?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(5), pages 1915-1953, May.
    2. Yusuke Uchiyama & Kei Nakagawa, 2020. "TPLVM: Portfolio Construction by Student’s t -Process Latent Variable Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, March.
    3. Yusuke Uchiyama & Kei Nakagawa, 2020. "TPLVM: Portfolio Construction by Student's $t$-process Latent Variable Model," Papers 2002.06243, arXiv.org.
    4. Kei Nakagawa & Yusuke Uchiyama, 2020. "GO-GJRSK Model with Application to Higher Order Risk-Based Portfolio," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Merton, Robert C., 1980. "On estimating the expected return on the market : An exploratory investigation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 323-361, December.
    6. Kei Nakagawa & Mitsuyoshi Imamura & Kenichi Yoshida, 2018. "Risk-Based Portfolios with Large Dynamic Covariance Matrices," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Thorsten Poddig & Albina Unger, 2012. "On the robustness of risk-based asset allocations," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 26(3), pages 369-401, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kei Nakagawa & Yusuke Uchiyama, 2020. "GO-GJRSK Model with Application to Higher Order Risk-Based Portfolio," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Giorgio Costa & Roy Kwon, 2020. "A robust framework for risk parity portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 447-466, September.
    3. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    4. Liusha Yang & Romain Couillet & Matthew R. McKay, 2015. "A Robust Statistics Approach to Minimum Variance Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1503.08013, arXiv.org.
    5. Vaughn Gambeta & Roy Kwon, 2020. "Risk Return Trade-Off in Relaxed Risk Parity Portfolio Optimization," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Seyoung Park & Eun Ryung Lee & Sungchul Lee & Geonwoo Kim, 2019. "Dantzig Type Optimization Method with Applications to Portfolio Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, June.
    7. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2019. "Cross-validated covariance estimators for high-dimensional minimum-variance portfolios," Papers 1910.13960, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    8. Peralta, Gustavo & Zareei, Abalfazl, 2016. "A network approach to portfolio selection," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(PA), pages 157-180.
    9. Nikolaus Hautsch & Lada M. Kyj & Peter Malec, 2015. "Do High‐Frequency Data Improve High‐Dimensional Portfolio Allocations?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 263-290, March.
    10. Min Dai & Yuchao Dong & Yanwei Jia, 2023. "Learning equilibrium mean‐variance strategy," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1166-1212, October.
    11. Lassance, Nathan & Vrins, Frédéric, 2021. "Portfolio selection with parsimonious higher comoments estimation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Paolella, Marc S. & Polak, Paweł & Walker, Patrick S., 2021. "A non-elliptical orthogonal GARCH model for portfolio selection under transaction costs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Donghun Lee, 2022. "Knowledge Gradient: Capturing Value of Information in Iterative Decisions under Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Rad, Hossein & Low, Rand Kwong Yew & Miffre, Joëlle & Faff, Robert, 2020. "Does sophistication of the weighting scheme enhance the performance of long-short commodity portfolios?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 164-180.
    15. Yi Huang & Wei Zhu & Duan Li & Shushang Zhu & Shikun Wang, 2023. "Integrating Different Informations for Portfolio Selection," Papers 2305.17881, arXiv.org.
    16. Simaan, Majeed & Simaan, Yusif & Tang, Yi, 2018. "Estimation error in mean returns and the mean-variance efficient frontier," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 109-124.
    17. Mark R. Powell, 2015. "Risk‐Based Sampling: I Don't Want to Weight in Vain," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(12), pages 2172-2182, December.
    18. David Allen & Stephen Satchell & Colin Lizieri, 2024. "Quantifying the non-Gaussian gain," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Thomas Trier Bjerring & Omri Ross & Alex Weissensteiner, 2017. "Feature selection for portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 21-40, September.
    20. Thomas Holgersson & Peter Karlsson & Andreas Stephan, 2020. "A risk perspective of estimating portfolio weights of the global minimum-variance portfolio," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(1), pages 59-80, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2202.09939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.