IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2107.06623.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial Network Games

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis Kanellopoulos
  • Maria Kyropoulou
  • Hao Zhou

Abstract

We study financial systems from a game-theoretic standpoint. A financial system is represented by a network, where nodes correspond to firms, and directed labeled edges correspond to debt contracts between them. The existence of cycles in the network indicates that a payment of a firm to one of its lenders might result to some incoming payment. So, if a firm cannot fully repay its debt, then the exact (partial) payments it makes to each of its creditors can affect the cash inflow back to itself. We naturally assume that the firms are interested in their financial well-being (utility) which is aligned with the amount of incoming payments they receive from the network. This defines a game among the firms, that can be seen as utility-maximizing agents who can strategize over their payments. We are the first to study financial network games that arise under a natural set of payment strategies called priority-proportional payments. We investigate the existence and (in)efficiency of equilibrium strategies, under different assumptions on how the firms' utility is defined, on the types of debt contracts allowed between the firms, and on the presence of other financial features that commonly arise in practice. Surprisingly, even if all firms' strategies are fixed, the existence of a unique payment profile is not guaranteed. So, we also investigate the existence and computation of valid payment profiles for fixed payment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis Kanellopoulos & Maria Kyropoulou & Hao Zhou, 2021. "Financial Network Games," Papers 2107.06623, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2107.06623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.06623
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabrielle Demange, 2018. "Contagion in Financial Networks: A Threat Index," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 955-970, February.
    2. Allouch, Nizar & Jalloul, Maya & Duncan, Alfred, 2023. "Strategic default in financial networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 941-954.
    3. Péter Csóka & P. Jean-Jacques Herings, 2018. "Decentralized Clearing in Financial Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4681-4699, October.
    4. Helmut Elsinger, 2009. "Financial Networks, Cross Holdings, and Limited Liability," Working Papers 156, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    5. Matthew Elliott & Benjamin Golub & Matthew O. Jackson, 2014. "Financial Networks and Contagion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3115-3153, October.
    6. P'al Andr'as Papp & Roger Wattenhofer, 2020. "Network-Aware Strategies in Financial Systems," Papers 2002.07566, arXiv.org.
    7. L. C. G. Rogers & L. A. M. Veraart, 2013. "Failure and Rescue in an Interbank Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 882-898, April.
    8. Steffen Schuldenzucker & Sven Seuken & Stefano Battiston, 2020. "Default Ambiguity: Credit Default Swaps Create New Systemic Risks in Financial Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 1981-1998, May.
    9. Mirjam Groote Schaarsberg & Hans Reijnierse & Peter Borm, 2018. "On solving mutual liability problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 87(3), pages 383-409, June.
    10. Larry Eisenberg & Thomas H. Noe, 2001. "Systemic Risk in Financial Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 236-249, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Péter Csóka & P. Jean-Jacques Herings, 2021. "An Axiomatization of the Proportional Rule in Financial Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2799-2812, May.
    2. Amini, Hamed & Bichuch, Maxim & Feinstein, Zachary, 2023. "Decentralized payment clearing using blockchain and optimal bidding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 409-420.
    3. Ketelaars, Martijn & Borm, Peter & Herings, P.J.J., 2023. "Duality in Financial Networks," Other publications TiSEM 26750293-9599-4e05-9ae1-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Giuseppe Calafiore & Giulia Fracastoro & Anton V. Proskurnikov, 2021. "Optimal Clearing Payments in a Financial Contagion Model," Papers 2103.10872, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    5. Steffen Schuldenzucker & Sven Seuken & Stefano Battiston, 2020. "Default Ambiguity: Credit Default Swaps Create New Systemic Risks in Financial Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 1981-1998, May.
    6. Ketelaars, Martijn, 2024. "Clearing in financial networks and dynamic investment under uncertainty," Other publications TiSEM 94768fb9-fd72-405d-a330-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Nicolas Houy & Frédéric Jouneau & François Le Grand, 2020. "Defaulting firms and systemic risks in financial networks: a normative approach," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(2), pages 503-526, September.
    8. Hamed Amini & Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2021. "Decentralized Payment Clearing using Blockchain and Optimal Bidding," Papers 2109.00446, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    9. Allouch, Nizar & Jalloul, Maya & Duncan, Alfred, 2023. "Strategic default in financial networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 941-954.
    10. Giansante, Simone & Manfredi, Sabato & Markose, Sheri, 2023. "Fair immunization and network topology of complex financial ecosystems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 612(C).
    11. Ketelaars, Martijn & Borm, Peter & Herings, P.J.J., 2024. "The Characterization of Clearing Payments in Financial Networks," Discussion Paper 2024-013, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    12. Martijn W. Ketelaars & Peter Borm, 2024. "On the unification of centralized and decentralized clearing mechanisms in financial networks," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 99(3), pages 205-231, June.
    13. Luitgard Anna Maria Veraart, 2022. "When does portfolio compression reduce systemic risk?," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 727-778, July.
    14. Péter Csóka & P. Jean-Jacques Herings, 2018. "Decentralized Clearing in Financial Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4681-4699, October.
    15. Feinstein Zachary & El-Masri Fatena, 2017. "The effects of leverage requirements and fire sales on financial contagion via asset liquidation strategies in financial networks," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 34(3-4), pages 113-139, September.
    16. Tathagata Banerjee & Zachary Feinstein, 2018. "Impact of Contingent Payments on Systemic Risk in Financial Networks," Papers 1805.08544, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    17. Csoka, Péter & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques, 2016. "Decentralized Clearing in Financial Networks (RM/16/005-revised-)," Research Memorandum 037, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    18. Covi, Giovanni & Gorpe, Mehmet Ziya & Kok, Christoffer, 2021. "CoMap: Mapping Contagion in the Euro Area Banking Sector," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    19. Nan Chen & Xin Liu & David D. Yao, 2016. "An Optimization View of Financial Systemic Risk Modeling: Network Effect and Market Liquidity Effect," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1089-1108, October.
    20. Robin Cubitt & Gijs Kuilen & Sujoy Mukerji, 2018. "The strength of sensitivity to ambiguity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 275-302, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2107.06623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.