IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2104.10163.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A q-binomial extension of the CRR asset pricing model

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Christophe Breton
  • Youssef El-Khatib
  • Jun Fan
  • Nicolas Privault

Abstract

We propose an extension of the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein (CRR) model based on $q$-binomial (or Kemp) random walks, with application to default with logistic failure rates. This model allows us to consider time-dependent switching probabilities varying according to a trend parameter on a non-self-similar binomial tree. In particular, it includes tilt and stretch parameters that control increment sizes. Option pricing formulas are written using $q$-binomial coefficients, and we study the convergence of this model to a Black-Scholes type formula in continuous time. A convergence rate of order $O(N^{-1/2})$ is obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Christophe Breton & Youssef El-Khatib & Jun Fan & Nicolas Privault, 2021. "A q-binomial extension of the CRR asset pricing model," Papers 2104.10163, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2104.10163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.10163
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francine Diener & MARC Diener, 2004. "Asymptotics of the price oscillations of a European call option in a tree model," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 271-293, April.
    2. Dietmar Leisen & Matthias Reimer, 1996. "Binomial models for option valuation - examining and improving convergence," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 319-346.
    3. Georgiadis, Evangelos, 2011. "Binomial options pricing has no closed-form solution," Algorithmic Finance, IOS Press, vol. 1(1), pages 13-16.
    4. Ralf Korn & Stefanie Müller, 2013. "The optimal-drift model: an accelerated binomial scheme," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 135-160, January.
    5. San-Lin Chung & Pai-Ta Shih, 2007. "Generalized Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Binomial Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 508-520, March.
    6. Andreas George Kyriakoussis & Malvina Vamvakari, 2013. "A q-Analogue of the Stirling Formula and a Continuous Limiting Behaviour of the q-Binomial Distribution—Numerical Calculations," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 187-213, March.
    7. Lo-Bin Chang & Ken Palmer, 2007. "Smooth convergence in the binomial model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 91-105, January.
    8. Yisong “Sam” Tian, 1999. "A flexible binomial option pricing model," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(7), pages 817-843, October.
    9. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
    10. Yisong Tian, 1993. "A modified lattice approach to option pricing," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(5), pages 563-577, August.
    11. Deheuvels, Paul & Puri, Madan L. & Ralescu, Stefan S., 1989. "Asymptotic expansions for sums of nonidentically distributed Bernoulli random variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 282-303, February.
    12. Leduc, Guillaume, 2012. "European Option General First Order Error Formula," MPRA Paper 42015, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Oct 2012.
    13. Steve Heston & Guofu Zhou, 2000. "On the Rate of Convergence of Discrete‐Time Contingent Claims," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 53-75, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Leduc & Merima Nurkanovic Hot, 2020. "Joshi’s Split Tree for Option Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-26, August.
    2. San-Lin Chung & Pai-Ta Shih, 2007. "Generalized Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Binomial Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 508-520, March.
    3. Alona Bock & Ralf Korn, 2016. "Improving Convergence of Binomial Schemes and the Edgeworth Expansion," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Gongqiu Zhang & Lingfei Li, 2019. "Analysis of Markov Chain Approximation for Option Pricing and Hedging: Grid Design and Convergence Behavior," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 407-427, March.
    5. Tianyang Wang & James Dyer & Warren Hahn, 2015. "A copula-based approach for generating lattices," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 263-289, October.
    6. Shvimer, Yossi & Herbon, Avi, 2020. "Comparative empirical study of binomial call-option pricing methods using S&P 500 index data," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    7. Pier Giuseppe Giribone & Simone Ligato, 2016. "Flexible-forward pricing through Leisen–Reimer trees: Implementation and performance comparison with traditional Markov chains," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Ghafarian, Bahareh & Hanafizadeh, Payam & Qahi, Amir Hossein Mortazavi, 2018. "Applying Greek letters to robust option price modeling by binomial-tree," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 632-639.
    9. Ralf Korn & Stefanie Müller, 2013. "The optimal-drift model: an accelerated binomial scheme," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 135-160, January.
    10. Mark Joshi, 2009. "Achieving smooth asymptotics for the prices of European options in binomial trees," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 171-176.
    11. Dong Zou & Pu Gong, 2017. "A Lattice Framework with Smooth Convergence for Pricing Real Estate Derivatives with Stochastic Interest Rate," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 242-263, August.
    12. Kyoung-Sook Moon & Hongjoong Kim, 2013. "A multi-dimensional local average lattice method for multi-asset models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 873-884, May.
    13. Kim, Young Shin & Stoyanov, Stoyan & Rachev, Svetlozar & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2019. "Enhancing binomial and trinomial equity option pricing models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 185-190.
    14. Gambaro, Anna Maria & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Fusai, Gianluca, 2020. "General lattice methods for arithmetic Asian options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1185-1199.
    15. Glazyrina, Anna & Melnikov, Alexander, 2016. "Bernstein’s inequalities and their extensions for getting the Black–Scholes option pricing formula," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 86-92.
    16. Mark Joshi & Mike Staunton, 2012. "On the analytical/numerical pricing of American put options against binomial tree prices," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 17-20, December.
    17. Qianru Shang & Brian Byrne, 2021. "American option pricing: Optimal Lattice models and multidimensional efficiency tests," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 514-535, April.
    18. Leisen, Dietmar P. J., 1999. "The random-time binomial model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1355-1386, September.
    19. Elisa Appolloni & Andrea Ligori, 2014. "Efficient tree methods for pricing digital barrier options," Papers 1401.2900, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2014.
    20. Aricson Cruz & José Carlos Dias, 2020. "Valuing American-style options under the CEV model: an integral representation based method," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 63-83, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2104.10163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.