IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2012.12555.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Market Impact in Trader-Agents: Adding Multi-Level Order-Flow Imbalance-Sensitivity to Automated Trading Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Zhang
  • Dave Cliff

Abstract

Financial markets populated by human traders often exhibit "market impact", where the traders' quote-prices move in the direction of anticipated change, before any transaction has taken place, as an immediate reaction to the arrival of a large (i.e., "block") buy or sell order in the market: e.g., traders in the market know that a block buy order will push the price up, and so they immediately adjust their quote-prices upwards. Most major financial markets now involve many "robot traders", autonomous adaptive software agents, rather than humans. This paper explores how to give such trader-agents a reliable anticipatory sensitivity to block orders, such that markets populated entirely by robot traders also show market-impact effects. In a 2019 publication Church & Cliff presented initial results from a simple deterministic robot trader, ISHV, which exhibits this market impact effect via monitoring a metric of imbalance between supply and demand in the market. The novel contributions of our paper are: (a) we critique the methods used by Church & Cliff, revealing them to be weak, and argue that a more robust measure of imbalance is required; (b) we argue for the use of multi-level order-flow imbalance (MLOFI: Xu et al., 2019) as a better basis for imbalance-sensitive robot trader-agents; and (c) we demonstrate the use of the more robust MLOFI measure in extending ISHV, and also the well-known AA and ZIP trading-agent algorithms (which have both been previously shown to consistently outperform human traders). We demonstrate that the new imbalance-sensitive trader-agents introduced here do exhibit market impact effects, and hence are better-suited to operating in markets where impact is a factor of concern or interest, but do not suffer the weaknesses of the methods used by Church & Cliff. The source-code for our work reported here is freely available on GitHub.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Zhang & Dave Cliff, 2020. "Market Impact in Trader-Agents: Adding Multi-Level Order-Flow Imbalance-Sensitivity to Automated Trading Systems," Papers 2012.12555, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.12555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.12555
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aaron Wray & Matthew Meades & Dave Cliff, 2020. "Automated Creation of a High-Performing Algorithmic Trader via Deep Learning on Level-2 Limit Order Book Data," Papers 2012.00821, arXiv.org.
    2. Steven Gjerstad, 2003. "The Strategic Impact of Pace in Double Auction Bargaining," Microeconomics 0304001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Arthur le Calvez & Dave Cliff, 2018. "Deep Learning can Replicate Adaptive Traders in a Limit-Order-Book Financial Market," Papers 1811.02880, arXiv.org.
    4. Steven Gjerstad, 2003. "The Impact of Pace in Double Auction Bargaining," Levine's Bibliography 666156000000000192, UCLA Department of Economics.
    5. Rama Cont & Arseniy Kukanov & Sasha Stoikov, 2014. "The Price Impact of Order Book Events," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 47-88.
    6. Ke Xu & Martin D. Gould & Sam D. Howison, 2019. "Multi-Level Order-Flow Imbalance in a Limit Order Book," Papers 1907.06230, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    7. Petrescu, Monica & Wedow, Michael, 2017. "Dark pools in European equity markets: emergence, competition and implications," Occasional Paper Series 193, European Central Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Snashall & Dave Cliff, 2019. "Adaptive-Aggressive Traders Don't Dominate," Papers 1910.09947, arXiv.org.
    2. Schnaubelt, Matthias, 2022. "Deep reinforcement learning for the optimal placement of cryptocurrency limit orders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 993-1006.
    3. Bradley Miles & Dave Cliff, 2019. "A Cloud-Native Globally Distributed Financial Exchange Simulator for Studying Real-World Trading-Latency Issues at Planetary Scale," Papers 1909.12926, arXiv.org.
    4. Dave Cliff, 2021. "BBE: Simulating the Microstructural Dynamics of an In-Play Betting Exchange via Agent-Based Modelling," Papers 2105.08310, arXiv.org.
    5. Henry Hanifan & John Cartlidge, 2019. "Fools Rush In: Competitive Effects of Reaction Time in Automated Trading," Papers 1912.02775, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    6. Xuan Tao & Andrew Day & Lan Ling & Samuel Drapeau, 2020. "On Detecting Spoofing Strategies in High Frequency Trading," Papers 2009.14818, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    7. Mahmoud Mahfouz & Angelos Filos & Cyrine Chtourou & Joshua Lockhart & Samuel Assefa & Manuela Veloso & Danilo Mandic & Tucker Balch, 2019. "On the Importance of Opponent Modeling in Auction Markets," Papers 1911.12816, arXiv.org.
    8. Fengpei Li & Vitalii Ihnatiuk & Ryan Kinnear & Anderson Schneider & Yuriy Nevmyvaka, 2022. "Do price trajectory data increase the efficiency of market impact estimation?," Papers 2205.13423, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    9. Stanis{l}aw Dro.zd.z & Jaros{l}aw Kwapie'n & Marcin Wk{a}torek, 2023. "What is mature and what is still emerging in the cryptocurrency market?," Papers 2305.05751, arXiv.org.
    10. Filip Stanek & Jiri Kukacka, 2018. "The Impact of the Tobin Tax in a Heterogeneous Agent Model of the Foreign Exchange Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 865-892, April.
    11. Antonio Briola & Silvia Bartolucci & Tomaso Aste, 2024. "Deep Limit Order Book Forecasting," Papers 2403.09267, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    12. Zijian Shi & John Cartlidge, 2024. "Neural stochastic agent‐based limit order book simulation with neural point process and diffusion probabilistic model," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), June.
    13. Bayona, Anna & Dumitrescu, Ariadna & Manzano, Carolina, 2023. "Information and optimal trading strategies with dark pools," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    14. Matthew F Dixon, 2017. "A High Frequency Trade Execution Model for Supervised Learning," Papers 1710.03870, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    15. Oriol, Nathalie & Rufini, Alexandra & Torre, Dominique, 2018. "Fifty-shades of grey: Competition between dark and lit pools in stock exchanges," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 68-85.
    16. Hagströmer, Björn, 2021. "Bias in the effective bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 314-337.
    17. Philippe Bergault & David Evangelista & Olivier Gu'eant & Douglas Vieira, 2018. "Closed-form approximations in multi-asset market making," Papers 1810.04383, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    18. Chen, Yuanyuan & Gao, Xuefeng & Li, Duan, 2018. "Optimal order execution using hidden orders," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 89-116.
    19. Tucker Hybinette Balch & Mahmoud Mahfouz & Joshua Lockhart & Maria Hybinette & David Byrd, 2019. "How to Evaluate Trading Strategies: Single Agent Market Replay or Multiple Agent Interactive Simulation?," Papers 1906.12010, arXiv.org.
    20. Eyal Neuman & Yufei Zhang, 2023. "Statistical Learning with Sublinear Regret of Propagator Models," Papers 2301.05157, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2012.12555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.