Lindahl Equilibrium as a Collective Choice Rule
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Andreu Mas-Colell, 1992. "Equilibrium Theory with Possibly Satiated Preferences," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Mukul Majumdar (ed.), Equilibrium and Dynamics, chapter 9, pages 201-213, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
- Thomson, William, 1994.
"Cooperative models of bargaining,"
Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 35, pages 1237-1284,
Elsevier.
- Thomson, W., 1989. "Cooperative Models Of Bargaining," RCER Working Papers 177, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
- Kelso, Alexander S, Jr & Crawford, Vincent P, 1982. "Job Matching, Coalition Formation, and Gross Substitutes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1483-1504, November.
- Hylland, Aanund & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1979. "The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(2), pages 293-314, April.
- Satoru Fujishige & Zaifu Yang, 2003. "A Note on Kelso and Crawford's Gross Substitutes Condition," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 463-469, August.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Brandl, Florian & Brandt, Felix & Greger, Matthias & Peters, Dominik & Stricker, Christian & Suksompong, Warut, 2022. "Funding public projects: A case for the Nash product rule," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
- Sayantan Ghosal & Lukasz Woźny, 2024. "Lindahl meets Condorcet?," Working Papers 2024_08, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
- Florian Brandl & Felix Brandt & Matthias Greger & Dominik Peters & Christian Stricker & Warut Suksompong, 2022. "Funding public projects: A case for the Nash product rule," Post-Print hal-03818329, HAL.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017.
"An invitation to market design,"
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
- Scott Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent Crawford, 2017. "An Invitation to Market Design," Working Papers 2017-069, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
- Kominers, Scott Duke & Teytelboym, Alexander & Crawford, Vincent P, 2017. "An invitation to market design," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt3xp2110t, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
- Izat B. Baybusinov & Enrico Maria Fenoaltea & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2022. "Negotiation problem," Papers 2201.12619, arXiv.org.
- Battal Doğan & M. Bumin Yenmez, 2023.
"When does an additional stage improve welfare in centralized assignment?,"
Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(4), pages 1145-1173, November.
- Battal Doğan & M. Bumin Yenmez, 2018. "When Does an Additional Stage Improve Welfare in Centralized Assignment?," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 18/704, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
- Yokote, Koji, 2021. "Consistency of the doctor-optimal equilibrium price vector in job-matching markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
- Alexis Garapin & Michel Hollard & Stéphane Robin & Bernard Ruffieux, 2000. "L'inefficacité d'une chaîne de monopoles : une étude expérimentale en situation de négociation répétée," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 145(4), pages 1-18.
- José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & António Osório & Josep E. Peris, 2015.
"From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach,"
Games, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, March.
- Giménez-Gómez, José-Manuel & Osorio, Antonio & Peris, Josep Enric, 2013. "From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach," QM&ET Working Papers 13-2, University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.
- Giménez-Gómez, José Manuel & Osório Costa, Antonio Miguel & Peris, Josep E., 2013. "From bargaining solutions to claims rules: a proportional approach," Working Papers 2072/212193, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
- Miralles, Antonio & Pycia, Marek, 2021.
"Foundations of pseudomarkets: Walrasian equilibria for discrete resources,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
- Pycia, Marek & Miralles, Antonio, 2020. "Foundations of Pseudomarkets: Walrasian Equilibria for Discrete Resources," CEPR Discussion Papers 15161, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Antonio Miralles & Marek Pycia, 2021. "Foundations of pseudomarkets: Walrasian equilibria for discrete resources," ECON - Working Papers 385, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
- Naeve-Steinweg, Elisabeth, 2002. "Mechanisms supporting the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 25-36, September.
- Yokote, Koji, 2017. "Application of the discrete separation theorem to auctions," MPRA Paper 82884, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Danilov, V. & Koshevoy, G. & Lang, C., 2013. "Equilibria in Markets with Indivisible Goods," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 10-34.
- Kojima, Fuhito, 2013. "Efficient resource allocation under multi-unit demand," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-14.
- Geoffroy de Clippel, 2009. "Axiomatic Bargaining on Economic Enviornments with Lott," Working Papers 2009-5, Brown University, Department of Economics.
- Jaume García Segarra & Miguel Ginés Vilar, 2011. "Weighted Proportional Losses Solution," ThE Papers 10/21, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
- Ortega, Josué, 2020.
"Multi-unit assignment under dichotomous preferences,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 15-24.
- Josue Ortega, 2017. "Multi-unit Assignment under Dichotomous Preferences," Papers 1703.10897, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2018.
- Ortega, Josué, 2018. "Multi-unit assignment under dichotomous preferences," ZEW Discussion Papers 18-052, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Mariotti, Marco, 1996.
"Non-optimal Nash Bargaining Solutions,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 15-20, July.
- M. Mariotti, 1994. "Nonoptimal Nash Bargaining Solutions," Working Papers 325, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
- Ozan Candogan & Markos Epitropou & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2021. "Competitive Equilibrium and Trading Networks: A Network Flow Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 114-147, January.
- Satoru Fujishige & Akihisa Tamura, 2007. "A Two-Sided Discrete-Concave Market with Possibly Bounded Side Payments: An Approach by Discrete Convex Analysis," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 136-155, February.
- Kazuo Murota, 2016. "Discrete convex analysis: A tool for economics and game theory," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 1(1), pages 151-273, December.
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2022.
"The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2987-3007, April.
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2017. "The attraction and compromise effects in bargaining: Experimental evidence," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 17-04, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2022. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Post-Print hal-03514435, HAL.
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2020. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Working Papers halshs-02466032, HAL.
- Fabio Galeotti, 2017. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Post-Print halshs-01657317, HAL.
- Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2018. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Post-Print halshs-01820223, HAL.
- l'Haridon, Olivier & Malherbet, Franck & Pérez-Duarte, Sébastien, 2013.
"Does bargaining matter in the small firms matching model?,"
Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 42-58.
- L'Haridon, Olivier & Malherbet, Franck & Pérez-Duarte, Sébastien, 2010. "Does bargaining matter in the small firm's matching Mmodel?," HEC Research Papers Series 938, HEC Paris.
- Olivier LHARIDON & Franck MALHERBET & Sébastien PEREZ-DUARTE, 2011. "Does Bargaining Matter in the Small Firm’s Matching Model?," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201116, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
- l’Haridon, Olivier & Malherbet, Franck & Pérez-Duarte, Sébastien, 2011. "Does bargaining matter in the small firm's matching model?," Working Paper Series 1359, European Central Bank.
- Olivier L’haridon & Franck Malherbet & Sébastien Pérez-Duarte, 2013. "Does bargaining matter in the small firms matching model?," Post-Print halshs-00801343, HAL.
- L'Haridon, Olivier & Malherbet, Franck & Pérez-Duarte, Sébastien, 2010. "Does Bargaining Matter in the Small Firm Matching Model?," IZA Discussion Papers 5181, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Olivier L'Haridon & Franck Malherbet & Sébastien Pérez-Duarte, 2010. "Does Bargaining Matter in the Small Firm's Matching Model?," Working Papers hal-00540792, HAL.
More about this item
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-GTH-2020-09-14 (Game Theory)
- NEP-MIC-2020-09-14 (Microeconomics)
- NEP-UPT-2020-09-14 (Utility Models and Prospect Theory)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2008.09932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.