IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1809.01487.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Resource and Competence (Internal) View vs. Environment and Market (External) View when defining a Business

Author

Listed:
  • Yngve Dahle
  • Martin Steinert
  • Anh Nguyen Duc
  • Roman Chizhevskiy

Abstract

Startups is a popular phenomenon that has a significant impact on global economy growth, innovation and society development. However, there is still insufficient understanding about startups, particularly, how to start a new business in the relation to consequent performance. Toward this knowledge, we have performed an empirical study regarding the differences between a Resource and Competence View (Internal) vs Environment and Market View (External) when defining a Business. 701 entrepreneurs have reflected on their startups on nine classes of Resources (values, vision, personal objectives, employees and partners, buildings and rental contracts, cash and credit, patents, IPR's and brands, products and services and finally revenues and grants) and three elements of the Business Mission ("KeyContribution", "KeyMarket" and "Distinction"). It seems to be a tendency to favour the Internal View over the External View. This tendency is clearer in Stable Economies (Europe) than in Emerging Economies (South Africa). There seems to be a co-variation between the tendency to favour the Internal View and the tendency to focus on adding Resources. Finally, we found that an order-based analysis seems to explain the differences between the two views better than a number-based method.

Suggested Citation

  • Yngve Dahle & Martin Steinert & Anh Nguyen Duc & Roman Chizhevskiy, 2018. "Resource and Competence (Internal) View vs. Environment and Market (External) View when defining a Business," Papers 1809.01487, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1809.01487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.01487
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bart, Christopher K., 1997. "Sex, lies, and mission statements," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 9-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiril Dimitrov & Marin Geshkov, 2018. "Dominating Attributes Of Professed Firm Culture Of Holding Companies – Members Of The Bulgarian Industrial Capital Association," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 3, pages 384-418, September.
    2. Giorgio Mion & Cristian Rolando Loza Adaui & Angelo Bonfanti, 2021. "Characterizing the mission statements of benefit corporations: Empirical evidence from Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2160-2172, May.
    3. Odile Paulus, 2008. "La déclaration de mission, une revue de la littérature," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2008-13, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    4. Nikolai Brosch, 2023. "Corporate purpose: from a ‘Tower of Babel’ phenomenon towards construct clarity," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 567-595, May.
    5. S. Desmidt & A. Prinzie & A. Heene, 2007. "Is the mission statement dead or alive? The level and determinants of mission statement use amongst the nurses of three Flemish hospitals: a questionnaire survey," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/489, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom, 2011. "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-87, March.
    7. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent & Marta Mas-Machuca & Patricia Guix, 2021. "Impact of mission statement components on social enterprises’ performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 705-724, April.
    8. Karel Slintak & Jan Dvorsky, 2019. "The Purpose of Firms and its Influence on Formulating Their Missions and Visions," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(2), pages 15-29.
    9. Bartkus, Barbara & Glassman, Myron & Bruce McAfee, R., 2000. "Mission statements: Are they smoke and mirrors?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 23-28.
    10. S. Desmidt & A. Prinzie & A. Heene, 2009. "Developing an effective mission statement for a health care organization: a step towards an evidence-based practice," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/565, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    11. Marta Mas-Machuca & Maria Ballesteros-Sola & Adrián Guerrero, 2017. "Unveiling the mission statements in social enterprises: a comparative content analysis of US- vs. Spanish-based organizations," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 186-200, May.
    12. Mion, Giorgio & Loza Adaui, Cristian R. & Bonfanti, Angelo & De Crescenzo, Veronica, 2023. "Mission statements and financial and sustainability performance: An exploratory study of Benefit Corporations certified as B Corps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    13. TOH Seong-Yuen & KOON Vui-Yee, 2017. "Determining Mission Statement Effectiveness From A Fit Perspective," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 220-240, August.
    14. Macedo, Isabel Maria & Pinho, José Carlos & Silva, Anabela Martins, 2016. "Revisiting the link between mission statements and organizational performance in the non-profit sector: The mediating effect of organizational commitment," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 36-46.
    15. Vladlen V. LEPSKY, 2018. "A Model for Devising a Medical Institution’s Development Strategy," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 9(3), pages 40-44, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1809.01487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.