IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1808.09698.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non-exchangeability of copulas arising from shock models

Author

Listed:
  • Damjana Kokol Bukovv{s}ek
  • Tomav{z} Kov{s}ir
  • Blav{z} Mojv{s}kerc
  • Matjav{z} Omladiv{c}

Abstract

When choosing the right copula for our data a key point is to distinguish the family that describes it at the best. In this respect, a better choice of the copulas could be obtained through the information about the (non)symmetry of the data. Exchangeability as a probability concept (first next to independence) has been studied since 1930's, copulas have been studied since 1950's, and even the most important class of copulas from the point of view of applications, i.e. the ones arising from shock models s.a. Marshall's copulas, have been studied since 1960's. However, the point of non-exchangeability of copulas was brought up only in 2006 and has been intensively studied ever since. One of the main contributions of this paper is the maximal asymmetry function for a family of copulas. We compute this function for the major families of shock-based copulas, i.e. Marshall, maxmin and reflected maxmin (RMM for short) copulas and also for some other important families. We compute the sharp bound of asymmetry measure $\mu_\infty$, the most important of the asymmetry measures, for the family of Marshall copulas and the family of maxmin copulas, which both equal to $\frac{4}{27}\ (\approx 0.148)$. One should compare this bound to the one for the class of PQD copulas to which they belong, which is $3-2\sqrt{2}\ \approx 0.172)$, and to the general bound for all copulas that is $\frac13$. Furthermore, we give the sharp bound of the same asymmetry measure for RMM copulas which is $3-2\sqrt{2}$, compared to the same bound for NQD copulas, where they belong, which is $\sqrt{5}-2\ (\approx 0.236)$. One of our main results is also the statistical interpretation of shocks in a given model at which the maximal asymmetry measure bound is attained. These interpretations for the three families studied are illustrated by examples that should be helpful to practitioners when choosing the model for their data.

Suggested Citation

  • Damjana Kokol Bukovv{s}ek & Tomav{z} Kov{s}ir & Blav{z} Mojv{s}kerc & Matjav{z} Omladiv{c}, 2018. "Non-exchangeability of copulas arising from shock models," Papers 1808.09698, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1808.09698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.09698
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabrizio Durante & Erich Klement & Carlo Sempi & Manuel Úbeda-Flores, 2010. "Measures of non-exchangeability for bivariate random vectors," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 687-699, September.
    2. Huillet, Thierry E., 2018. "Stochastic species abundance models involving special copulas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 77-91.
    3. Mai, Jan-Frederik & Scherer, Matthias, 2012. "H-extendible copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 151-160.
    4. Lindskog, Filip & McNeil, Alexander J., 2003. "Common Poisson Shock Models: Applications to Insurance and Credit Risk Modelling," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 209-238, November.
    5. Umberto Cherubini & Sabrina Mulinacci, 2015. "Systemic Risk with Exchangeable Contagion: Application to the European Banking System," Papers 1502.01918, arXiv.org.
    6. Roger Nelsen, 2007. "Extremes of nonexchangeability," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 695-695, October.
    7. Fabrizio Durante & Pier Papini, 2010. "Non-exchangeability of negatively dependent random variables," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 139-149, March.
    8. Durante, Fabrizio & Okhrin, Ostap, 2014. "Estimation procedures for exchangeable Marshall copulas with hydrological application," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2014-014, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azam Dehgani & Ali Dolati & Manuel Úbeda-Flores, 2013. "Measures of radial asymmetry for bivariate random vectors," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 271-286, May.
    2. Papini Pier Luigi, 2015. "Bivariate copulas, norms and non-exchangeability," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7, November.
    3. Damjana Kokol Bukovv{s}ek & Tomav{z} Kov{s}ir & Blav{z} Mojv{s}kerc & Matjav{z} Omladiv{c}, 2018. "Asymmetric linkages: maxmin vs. reflected maxmin copulas," Papers 1808.07737, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    4. Damjana Kokol Bukovv{s}ek & Tomav{z} Kov{s}ir & Blav{z} Mojv{s}kerc & Matjav{z} Omladiv{c}, 2019. "Relation between non-exchangeability and measures of concordance of copulas," Papers 1909.06648, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    5. Pavel Krupskii, 2017. "Copula-based measures of reflection and permutation asymmetry and statistical tests," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1165-1187, December.
    6. J. Rosco & Harry Joe, 2013. "Measures of tail asymmetry for bivariate copulas," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 709-726, August.
    7. Karl Siburg & Pavel Stoimenov, 2011. "Symmetry of functions and exchangeability of random variables," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Damjana Kokol Bukovv{s}ek & Tomav{z} Kov{s}ir & Blav{z} Mojv{s}kerc & Matjav{z} Omladiv{c}, 2019. "Relation between Blomqvist's beta and other measures of concordance of copulas," Papers 1911.03467, arXiv.org.
    9. Hua, Lei & Polansky, Alan & Pramanik, Paramahansa, 2019. "Assessing bivariate tail non-exchangeable dependence," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Arturo Erdely & José González-Barrios, 2010. "A nonparametric symmetry test for absolutely continuous bivariate copulas," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 19(4), pages 541-565, November.
    11. Harder, Michael & Stadtmüller, Ulrich, 2014. "Maximal non-exchangeability in dimension d," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 31-41.
    12. Werner Hürlimann, 2017. "A comprehensive extension of the FGM copula," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 373-392, June.
    13. Brigo, Damiano & Mai, Jan-Frederik & Scherer, Matthias, 2016. "Markov multi-variate survival indicators for default simulation as a new characterization of the Marshall–Olkin law," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 60-66.
    14. Fabrizio Durante & Erich Klement & Carlo Sempi & Manuel Úbeda-Flores, 2010. "Measures of non-exchangeability for bivariate random vectors," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 687-699, September.
    15. Okhrin, Ostap & Ristig, Alexander & Sheen, Jeffrey R. & Trück, Stefan, 2015. "Conditional systemic risk with penalized copula," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2015-038, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    16. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2021. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-24.
    17. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Areski Cousin & Stéphane Crépey & Alexander Herbertsson, 2014. "Dynamic Hedging of Portfolio Credit Risk in a Markov Copula Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 90-102, April.
    18. Beare, Brendan K. & Seo, Juwon, 2020. "Randomization Tests Of Copula Symmetry," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(6), pages 1025-1063, December.
    19. Thomas Deschatre & Xavier Warin, 2023. "A Common Shock Model for multidimensional electricity intraday price modelling with application to battery valuation," Papers 2307.16619, arXiv.org.
    20. Antoine Bouveret, 2018. "Cyber Risk for the Financial Sector: A Framework for Quantitative Assessment," IMF Working Papers 2018/143, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1808.09698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.