IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1603.09149.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk Sensitive Portfolio Optimization in a Jump Diffusion Model with Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Kumar Das
  • Anindya Goswami
  • Nimit Rana

Abstract

This article studies a portfolio optimization problem, where the market consisting of several stocks is modeled by a multi-dimensional jump-diffusion process with age-dependent semi-Markov modulated coefficients. We study risk sensitive portfolio optimization on the finite time horizon. We study the problem by using a probabilistic approach to establish the existence and uniqueness of the classical solution to the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation. We also implement a numerical scheme to investigate the behavior of solutions for different values of the initial portfolio wealth, the maturity, and the risk of aversion parameter.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Kumar Das & Anindya Goswami & Nimit Rana, 2016. "Risk Sensitive Portfolio Optimization in a Jump Diffusion Model with Regimes," Papers 1603.09149, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1603.09149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.09149
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Kallsen, 2000. "Optimal portfolios for exponential Lévy processes," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 51(3), pages 357-374, August.
    2. Hunt, Julien & Devolder, Pierre, 2011. "Semi-Markov regime switching interest rate models and minimal entropy measure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(21), pages 3767-3781.
    3. Dungey, Mardi & McKenzie, Michael & Smith, L. Vanessa, 2009. "Empirical evidence on jumps in the term structure of the US Treasury Market," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 430-445, June.
    4. Dieter Sondermann, 2006. "Introduction to Stochastic Calculus for Finance," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-34837-5, February.
    5. Hunt, Julien & Devolder, Pierre, 2011. "Semi Markov regime switching interest rate models and minimal entropy measure," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2011010, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milan Kumar Das & Anindya Goswami, 2019. "Testing of binary regime switching models using squeeze duration analysis," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Lijun Bo & Huafu Liao & Xiang Yu, 2017. "Risk Sensitive Portfolio Optimization with Default Contagion and Regime-Switching," Papers 1712.05676, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    3. Milan Kumar Das & Anindya Goswami & Sharan Rajani, 2023. "Inference of Binary Regime Models with Jump Discontinuities," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(1), pages 49-86, May.
    4. Minglian Lin & Indranil SenGupta, 2021. "Analysis of optimal portfolio on finite and small time horizons for a stochastic volatility market model," Papers 2104.06293, arXiv.org.
    5. Milan Kumar Das & Anindya Goswami & Sharan Rajani, 2019. "Inference of Binary Regime Models with Jump Discontinuities," Papers 1910.10606, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    6. Milan Kumar Das & Anindya Goswami, 2018. "Testing of Binary Regime Switching Models using Squeeze Duration Analysis," Papers 1807.04393, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    7. Marcin Pitera & Łukasz Stettner, 2023. "Discrete‐time risk sensitive portfolio optimization with proportional transaction costs," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1287-1313, October.
    8. Marcin Pitera & {L}ukasz Stettner, 2022. "Discrete-time risk sensitive portfolio optimization with proportional transaction costs," Papers 2201.02828, arXiv.org.
    9. Laura Eslava & Fernando Baltazar-Larios & Bor Reynoso, 2022. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation for a Markov-Modulated Jump-Diffusion Model," Papers 2211.17220, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Matthys, Felix, 2019. "Robust consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices can jump," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1-56.
    2. D’Amico, Guglielmo & Manca, Raimondo & Salvi, Giovanni, 2013. "A semi-Markov modulated interest rate model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(9), pages 2094-2102.
    3. Laura Pasin & Tiziano Vargiolu, 2010. "Optimal Portfolio for CRRA Utility Functions when Risky Assets are Exponential Additive Processes," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 39(1‐2), pages 65-90, February.
    4. Xiaojing Xi & Rogemar Mamon, 2014. "Capturing the Regime-Switching and Memory Properties of Interest Rates," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 44(3), pages 307-337, October.
    5. Guglielmo D'Amico & Raimondo Manca & Giovanni Salvi, 2012. "A Semi-Markov Modulated Interest Rate Model," Papers 1210.3164, arXiv.org.
    6. Preda, Vasile & Dedu, Silvia & Sheraz, Muhammad, 2014. "New measure selection for Hunt–Devolder semi-Markov regime switching interest rate models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 350-359.
    7. Patrick Assonken & G. S. Ladde, 2015. "Option Pricing With A Levy-Type Stochastic Dynamic Model For Stock Price Process Under Semi-Markovian Structural Perturbations," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(08), pages 1-72, December.
    8. Zongxia Liang & Ming Ma, 2020. "Robust consumption‐investment problem under CRRA and CARA utilities with time‐varying confidence sets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1035-1072, July.
    9. Anindya Goswami & Omkar Manjarekar & Anjana R, 2018. "Option Pricing in a Regime Switching Jump Diffusion Model," Papers 1811.11379, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    10. Jérôme Detemple, 2014. "Portfolio Selection: A Review," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Tanmay S. Patankar, 2016. "Asset Pricing in a Semi-Markov Modulated Market with Time-dependent Volatility," Papers 1609.04907, arXiv.org.
    12. Marco Piccirilli & Tiziano Vargiolu, 2018. "Optimal Portfolio in Intraday Electricity Markets Modelled by L\'evy-Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Processes," Papers 1807.01979, arXiv.org.
    13. Ariel Neufeld & Marcel Nutz, 2015. "Robust Utility Maximization with L\'evy Processes," Papers 1502.05920, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    14. Anne Lavigne, 2006. "Gouvernance et investissement des fonds de pension privés aux Etats-Unis," Working Papers halshs-00081401, HAL.
    15. An Chen & Thai Nguyen & Thorsten Sehner, 2022. "Unit-Linked Tontine: Utility-Based Design, Pricing and Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.
    16. Alan J. Auerbach, 1981. "Evaluating the Taxation of Risky Assets," NBER Working Papers 0806, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Hong, Claire Yurong & Lu, Xiaomeng & Pan, Jun, 2021. "FinTech adoption and household risk-taking," BOFIT Discussion Papers 14/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    18. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Auffret, Philippe, 2001. "An alternative unifying measure of welfare gains from risk-sharing," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2676, The World Bank.
    20. Luca De Gennaro Aquino & Sascha Desmettre & Yevhen Havrylenko & Mogens Steffensen, 2024. "Equilibrium control theory for Kihlstrom-Mirman preferences in continuous time," Papers 2407.16525, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1603.09149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.