IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1505.02292.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wrong-Way Bounds in Counterparty Credit Risk Management

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Memartoluie
  • David Saunders
  • Tony Wirjanto

Abstract

We study the problem of finding the worst-case joint distribution of a set of risk factors given prescribed multivariate marginals and a nonlinear loss function. We show that when the risk measure is CVaR, and the distributions are discretized, the problem can be conveniently solved using linear programming technique. The method has applications to any situation where marginals are provided, and bounds need to be determined on total portfolio risk. This arises in many financial contexts, including pricing and risk management of exotic options, analysis of structured finance instruments, and aggregation of portfolio risk across risk types. Applications to counterparty credit risk are emphasized, and they include assessing wrong-way risk in the credit valuation adjustment, and counterparty credit risk measurement. Lastly a detailed application of the algorithm for counterparty risk measurement to a real portfolio case is also presented in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Memartoluie & David Saunders & Tony Wirjanto, 2015. "Wrong-Way Bounds in Counterparty Credit Risk Management," Papers 1505.02292, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1505.02292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.02292
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Ioana Popescu, 2002. "On the Relation Between Option and Stock Prices: A Convex Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 358-374, April.
    2. Haase, Joerdis & Ilg, Melanie & Werner, Ralf, 2010. "Model-free bounds on bilateral counterparty valuation," MPRA Paper 24796, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. M. Avellaneda & A. Levy & A. ParAS, 1995. "Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain volatilities," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 73-88.
    4. Denis Talay & Ziyu Zheng, 2002. "Worst case model risk management," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 517-537.
    5. Chen, X. & Deelstra, G. & Dhaene, J. & Vanmaele, M., 2008. "Static super-replicating strategies for a class of exotic options," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 1067-1085, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arash Fahim & Yu-Jui Huang, 2016. "Model-independent superhedging under portfolio constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 51-81, January.
    2. Mathias Beiglbock & Pierre Henry-Labord`ere & Friedrich Penkner, 2011. "Model-independent Bounds for Option Prices: A Mass Transport Approach," Papers 1106.5929, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2013.
    3. Arash Fahim & Yu-Jui Huang, 2014. "Model-independent Superhedging under Portfolio Constraints," Papers 1402.2599, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    4. Mathias Beiglböck & Pierre Henry-Labordère & Friedrich Penkner, 2013. "Model-independent bounds for option prices—a mass transport approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 477-501, July.
    5. H. Albrecher & P. A. Mayer & W. Schoutens, 2008. "General Lower Bounds for Arithmetic Asian Option Prices," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 123-149.
    6. Arash Fahim & Yu-Jui Huang, 2016. "Model-independent superhedging under portfolio constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 51-81, January.
    7. Evangelia Dragazi & Shuaiqiang Liu & Antonis Papapantoleon, 2024. "Improved model-free bounds for multi-asset options using option-implied information and deep learning," Papers 2404.02343, arXiv.org.
    8. Ariel Neufeld & Antonis Papapantoleon & Qikun Xiang, 2023. "Model-Free Bounds for Multi-Asset Options Using Option-Implied Information and Their Exact Computation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2051-2068, April.
    9. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2016. "Stochastic Target Games and Dynamic Programming via Regularized Viscosity Solutions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 109-124, February.
    10. Radu Tunaru, 2015. "Model Risk in Financial Markets:From Financial Engineering to Risk Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9524, December.
    11. Laurence, Peter & Wang, Tai-Ho, 2009. "Sharp distribution free lower bounds for spread options and the corresponding optimal subreplicating portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 35-47, February.
    12. Peter Laurence & Tai-Ho Wang, 2008. "Distribution-free upper bounds for spread options and market-implied antimonotonicity gap," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(8), pages 717-734.
    13. Ruggero Caldana & Gianluca Fusai & Alessandro Gnoatto & Martino Grasselli, 2016. "General closed-form basket option pricing bounds," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 535-554, April.
    14. Hansjörg Albrecher & Philipp Mayer, 2010. "Semi-Static Hedging Strategies For Exotic Options," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Rüdiger Kiesel & Matthias Scherer & Rudi Zagst (ed.), Alternative Investments And Strategies, chapter 14, pages 345-373, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    16. Antoine Jacquier & Patrick Roome, 2015. "Black-Scholes in a CEV random environment," Papers 1503.08082, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    17. Li, Xinpeng & Peng, Shige, 2011. "Stopping times and related Itô's calculus with G-Brownian motion," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 121(7), pages 1492-1508, July.
    18. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2008. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Partial Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 188-203, February.
    19. Kim Weston, 2016. "Stability of utility maximization in nonequivalent markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-541, April.
    20. Elyes Jouini & Pierre-Francois Koehl, "undated". "Pricing of Non-redundant Derivatives in a Complete Market," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires 99-009, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1505.02292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.