IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ant/wpaper/2015016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Two-level orthogonal designs in 24 and 28 runs

Author

Listed:
  • SCHOEN, Eric D.
  • VO-THANH, Nha
  • GOOS, Peter

Abstract

Due to incomplete previous approaches it is largely unclear which are the best 24-run and 28-run two-level designs in terms of any of the criteria currently in use to evaluate designs. In the present paper, we address this issue. First, we study the complete catalog of non-isomorphic orthogonal two-level 24-run designs involving 3-23 factors and we identify the best few designs in terms of aliasing between main effects and two-factor interaction effects and, subject to this, in terms of aliasing among two-factor interaction effects. Next, by modifying an existing enumeration algorithm, we identify the best few 28-run designs involving 3-14 factors. Based on a complete catalog of 7570 designs with 28 runs and 27 factors, we also seek good designs with more than 14 factors. To demonstrate the added value of our work, we provide a detailed comparison of our designs to the alternatives available in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • SCHOEN, Eric D. & VO-THANH, Nha & GOOS, Peter, 2015. "Two-level orthogonal designs in 24 and 28 runs," Working Papers 2015016, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2015016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/1d5004/a6323294.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Dennis K. J. & Draper, Norman R., 1993. "Generating alias relationships for two-level Plackett and Burman designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 147-157, February.
    2. P. Angelopoulos & H. Evangelaras & C. Koukouvinos & E. Lappas, 2007. "An effective step-down algorithm for the construction and the identification of nonisomorphic orthogonal arrays," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 139-149, September.
    3. Eric D. Schoen & Robert W. Mee, 2012. "Two‐level designs of strength 3 and up to 48 runs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 163-174, January.
    4. H. Evangelaras & S. Georgiou & C. Koukouvinos, 2004. "Evaluation of inequivalent projections of Hadamard matrices of order 24," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 51-73, February.
    5. SCHOEN, Eric D. & MEE, Robert W., 2012. "Two-level designs of strength 3 and up to 48 runs," Working Papers 2012005, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. VÁZQUEZ-ALCOCER, Alan & GOOS, Peter & SCHOEN, Eric D., 2016. "Two-level designs constructed by concatenating orthogonal arrays of strenght three," Working Papers 2016011, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. SCHOEN, Eric D. & VO-THANH, Nha & GOOS, Peter, 2016. "Orthogonal blocking arrangements for 24-run and 28-run two-level designs," Working Papers 2016002, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nha Vo-Thanh & Peter Goos & Eric D. Schoen, 2020. "Integer programming approaches to find row–column arrangements of two-level orthogonal experimental designs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 780-796, July.
    2. VÁZQUEZ-ALCOCER, Alan & SCHOEN, Eric D. & GOOS, Peter, 2018. "A mixed integer optimization approach for model selection in screening experiments," Working Papers 2018007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    3. SARTONO, Bagus & GOOS, Peter & SCHOEN, Eric D., 2012. "Orthogonal blocking of regular and non-regular strength-3 designs," Working Papers 2012026, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. VÁZQUEZ-ALCOCER, Alan & GOOS, Peter & SCHOEN, Eric D., 2016. "Two-level designs constructed by concatenating orthogonal arrays of strenght three," Working Papers 2016011, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. Eric D. Schoen & Nha Vo-Thanh & Peter Goos, 2017. "Two-Level Orthogonal Screening Designs With 24, 28, 32, and 36 Runs," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 1354-1369, July.
    6. EENDEBAK, Pieter T. & SCHOEN, Eric D., 2015. "Two-level designs to estimate all main effects and two-factor interactions," Working Papers 2015019, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    7. Zhou, Qi & Guo, Bing, 2017. "A note on constructing clear compromise plans," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 17-24.
    8. Eendebak, Pieter T. & Schoen, Eric D. & Vazquez, Alan R. & Goos, Peter, 2023. "Systematic enumeration of two-level even-odd designs of strength 3," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. SCHOEN, Eric D. & MEE, Robert W., 2012. "Two-level designs of strength 3 and up to 48 runs," Working Papers 2012005, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    10. Kolaiti, E. & Koukouvinos, C., 2006. "On the use of three level orthogonal arrays in robust parameter design," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 266-273, February.
    11. Lawson, John, 2002. "Regression analysis of experiments with complex confounding patterns guided by the alias matrix," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 227-241, April.
    12. Evangelaras, H. & Koukouvinos, C., 2004. "On generalized projectivity of two-level screening designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 429-434, July.
    13. SCHOEN, Eric D. & VO-THANH, Nha & GOOS, Peter, 2016. "Orthogonal blocking arrangements for 24-run and 28-run two-level designs," Working Papers 2016002, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    14. P. Angelopoulos & H. Evangelaras & C. Koukouvinos & E. Lappas, 2007. "An effective step-down algorithm for the construction and the identification of nonisomorphic orthogonal arrays," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 139-149, September.
    15. H. Evangelaras & S. D. Georgiou, 2021. "Projection properties of two-level supersaturated designs constructed from Hadamard designs using Lin’s method," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(8), pages 1095-1108, November.
    16. Mohammed A. Alomair & Stelios D. Georgiou & Manohar Aggarwal, 2020. "Projection properties of three‐level screening designs," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 62(4), pages 407-425, December.
    17. Evangelaras, H. & Kolaiti, E. & Koukouvinos, C., 2006. "Non-isomorphic orthogonal arrays obtained by juxtaposition," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 274-279, February.
    18. Roberto Fontana, 2015. "Optimal design generation: an approach based on discovery probability," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1231-1244, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2015016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joeri Nys (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ftufsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.